Gaming review websites

[slick1ru2]

Originally Posted by Trace17

Wait, how am I wrong by default? I said it was flawed. You can't say the sum score represents all parts if you only acknowledge certain parts. Let's say for example that tarvis hates IGN and doesn't acknowledge any of their reviews. And let's say they gave a game a 100, most other reviews gave the game somewhere in the 80s. So how is the final metacritic score representative of the game, in tarvis' eyes? It's flawed if he doesn't acknowledge all parts.

But if you want to argue that metacritic is a good site to use to find reviews and not necessarily acknowledge the overall "score", then I would agree.

Personally, I don't agree with metacritic scores. But I usually go against the tide.

That's pretty much what I am saying. And I want to know 1 game with a low Metacritic rating you think is awesome, just one.