Clash of the Titans 3D Blu-ray (2010) [Region Free] - Blu-ray Forum

MiC. UHD · 12-18-2011, 04:19 PM

In my honest opinion, I think 17 dollars is still too much for this title. I remember going to the theaters to watch this, the use of 3D seemed almost nonexistent to me. There's definitely MUCH better 3D content out there for your buck!

bigbadwolfe911 · 12-18-2011, 05:35 PM

I really enjoyed this movie for the movie itself, the 3D in the theaters was not as good as the 3D on the Bluray at least I thought it was more evident at home. But like said above if you like the film then the price is great for a 3D copy of it but if your looking for 3D experience there better films to get it in.

dogofwar · 12-18-2011, 08:42 PM

Thanks, I'm only looking at this title for the 3D value, saw the movie on HBO and thought it was really mediocre. I have a few movies that if I watched them in 2D I wouldn't care much for them but in 3D they are fun movies. I'll pass on this one.

Blueoktober · 12-18-2011, 10:17 PM

I hate them movie but seriously, the 3D isn't as bad as the "legend" would have it. I wonder how many people who dog it actually own it. It's not great, but it's not the worst. For $17 it's not a horrible deal. But liking ANY movie you buy helps. If it's just for 3D, go buy something you like even if it's a few bucks more.

dogofwar · 12-18-2011, 10:41 PM

I saw Drive Angry and Piranha as screeners in 2D and did not like either film but then I scooped them up in 3D and that made them completely different films for me. I showed my brother RE in 3D, he had saw the film on HBO and said it was ok, but in 3D the film kicks ass. So there are some movies that aren't that great but the 3D elevates it greatly, Titans it would seem is not one of those.

I'll just avoid Titans for now and who knows maybe it will drop as low as Hoodwinked Too has.

NzScreamindemon · 12-18-2011, 11:08 PM

Funnily enough...I have just finished watching this movie, and personally I really enjoyed it (guess it depends on your tastes) Why buy a movie if you arent the least bit interested in sword wielding action - just to see what the 3d is like? And then bag it when you don't enjoy the movie....

Contrary to all the negative comments on here I actually found the 3d to be pretty good with plenty of depth, how-ever with that came a certain feeling of the 3d being "un-natural" and in some cases almost "forced" There are a few areas where the 3d also looks "rushed" but overall it's not bad.....

Sam Worthington for some reason reminded me of early Mel Gibson (mad max era)...sure the whole thing is rather predictable - but then what movies arent!

Summary - I would say that the movie was "over-slammed" by critics who as usual were comparing the 3d to Avatar! And possibly because it wasnt a box-office smash!

The story flows (and doesn't drag on, and on - my knock at Avatar

), unlike some much better touted movies out there, actors seem to fit their roles pretty well.....if there is one gripe I do have it's that the djin (desert people) seem too plastic looking....It's the kind of movie you really need to judge on your own merits.

Hope this er kinda helps,
Chris

Jimmy Smith · 12-19-2011, 12:45 AM

Id say no. The movie was mediocre and dissipointing but watchable. The 3D however is just lacking. There just isn't much of it and its so weak at times that it hardly even seems worth wearing glasses. It does have a few moments where the 3D benefits the picture but they are few and far between

12-18-2011, 04:19 PM	#1
MiC. UHD Expert Member Member since:Mar 2011 Location:Massachusetts 4K collection:9 Blu-ray collection:302 Trading Score:28	In my honest opinion, I think 17 dollars is still too much for this title. I remember going to the theaters to watch this, the use of 3D seemed almost nonexistent to me. There's definitely MUCH better 3D content out there for your buck!

12-18-2011, 05:35 PM	#2
bigbadwolfe911 Expert Member Member since:Jan 2011 Location:SLC, Utah Trading Score:707	I really enjoyed this movie for the movie itself, the 3D in the theaters was not as good as the 3D on the Bluray at least I thought it was more evident at home. But like said above if you like the film then the price is great for a 3D copy of it but if your looking for 3D experience there better films to get it in.

12-18-2011, 08:42 PM	#3
dogofwar Special Member Member since:Oct 2011 Location:South Korea 4K collection:18 Blu-ray collection:1050 DVD collection:58 Blu-ray reviews:1	Thanks, I'm only looking at this title for the 3D value, saw the movie on HBO and thought it was really mediocre. I have a few movies that if I watched them in 2D I wouldn't care much for them but in 3D they are fun movies. I'll pass on this one.

12-18-2011, 10:17 PM	#4
Blueoktober Expert Member Member since:May 2010 Location:Orlando FL 4K collection:303 Blu-ray collection:2750 DVD collection:6 Digital collection:2 iTunes collection:1 Prime collection:8	I hate them movie but seriously, the 3D isn't as bad as the "legend" would have it. I wonder how many people who dog it actually own it. It's not great, but it's not the worst. For $17 it's not a horrible deal. But liking ANY movie you buy helps. If it's just for 3D, go buy something you like even if it's a few bucks more.

12-18-2011, 10:41 PM	#5
dogofwar Special Member Member since:Oct 2011 Location:South Korea 4K collection:18 Blu-ray collection:1050 DVD collection:58 Blu-ray reviews:1	I saw Drive Angry and Piranha as screeners in 2D and did not like either film but then I scooped them up in 3D and that made them completely different films for me. I showed my brother RE in 3D, he had saw the film on HBO and said it was ok, but in 3D the film kicks ass. So there are some movies that aren't that great but the 3D elevates it greatly, Titans it would seem is not one of those. I'll just avoid Titans for now and who knows maybe it will drop as low as Hoodwinked Too has.

12-18-2011, 11:08 PM	#6
NzScreamindemon Active Member Top contributor Member since:Aug 2011 Location:Christchurch, New Zealand 4K collection:2 Blu-ray collection:430 Blu-ray reviews:3 Trading Score:1	Funnily enough...I have just finished watching this movie, and personally I really enjoyed it (guess it depends on your tastes) Why buy a movie if you arent the least bit interested in sword wielding action - just to see what the 3d is like? And then bag it when you don't enjoy the movie.... Contrary to all the negative comments on here I actually found the 3d to be pretty good with plenty of depth, how-ever with that came a certain feeling of the 3d being "un-natural" and in some cases almost "forced" There are a few areas where the 3d also looks "rushed" but overall it's not bad..... Sam Worthington for some reason reminded me of early Mel Gibson (mad max era)...sure the whole thing is rather predictable - but then what movies arent! Summary - I would say that the movie was "over-slammed" by critics who as usual were comparing the 3d to Avatar! And possibly because it wasnt a box-office smash! The story flows (and doesn't drag on, and on - my knock at Avatar ), unlike some much better touted movies out there, actors seem to fit their roles pretty well.....if there is one gripe I do have it's that the djin (desert people) seem too plastic looking....It's the kind of movie you really need to judge on your own merits. Hope this er kinda helps, Chris

12-19-2011, 12:45 AM	#7
Jimmy Smith Blu-ray Samurai Member since:May 2008 Blu-ray collection:17	Id say no. The movie was mediocre and dissipointing but watchable. The 3D however is just lacking. There just isn't much of it and its so weak at times that it hardly even seems worth wearing glasses. It does have a few moments where the 3D benefits the picture but they are few and far between

Best 3D Blu-ray Deals