What do you think about 3D? Do you like it? Hate it? Think it's better than 4K? - Page 23 - Blu-ray Forum

STARSCREAM · 08-22-2011, 03:56 PM

I think 3D video games are awesome. The added depth it gives to some of the games is really outstanding and is way more immersive.

Red's got the Blu's · 08-23-2011, 02:25 PM

Just ran across this article where Scorsese, Coppola and Spielberg give their thoughts on 3D. The writer of the article struck me as anti-3D and although it is a few weeks old thought some of you might enjoy the read.

MiC. UHD · 08-23-2011, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 3D

Just ran across this article where Scorsese, Coppola and Spielberg give their thoughts on 3D. The writer of the article struck me as anti-3D and although it is a few weeks old thought some of you might enjoy the read.

Definitely a good read, thanks!

Lovemy3D · 08-24-2011, 02:00 AM

Yes, very interesting. Thank you.

threefiftyrocket · 10-13-2011, 02:16 PM

I just have a question about 3D blu rays and such, hopefully its just a simple yes or no answer.

I have a friend who has a 3D blu player, but his TV is only 2D. If we pop in a 3D blu ray such as the new Pirates 3D blu ray, but it is on a 2D screen, will his player down convert it to 2D so it just looks like the 2D version? I'm curious because I don't have a 3D player and might just give him the 3D version if it will work.

Sorry I'm a noob when it comes to the 3D stuff. Thanks for your replies!

Dotpattern · 10-13-2011, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threefiftyrocket

I just have a question about 3D blu rays and such, hopefully its just a simple yes or no answer.

I have a friend who has a 3D blu player, but his TV is only 2D. If we pop in a 3D blu ray such as the new Pirates 3D blu ray, but it is on a 2D screen, will his player down convert it to 2D so it just looks like the 2D version? I'm curious because I don't have a 3D player and might just give him the 3D version if it will work.

Sorry I'm a noob when it comes to the 3D stuff. Thanks for your replies!

When watching a 3D Blu-ray from a 3D Blu-ray player and a 3DTV, you are able to turn off the 3D and watch it in 2D. Your friends 3D Blu-ray player should be able to recognize that the TV is not 3D compatible and output the movie in 2D only.

threefiftyrocket · 10-14-2011, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dotpattern

When watching a 3D Blu-ray from a 3D Blu-ray player and a 3DTV, you are able to turn off the 3D and watch it in 2D. Your friends 3D Blu-ray player should be able to recognize that the TV is not 3D compatible and output the movie in 2D only.

Awesome, I had no idea and everyone I have asked so far would give me that I dunno grunt. It's hard to find stuff to read on it too when I look up 3D I just find a bunch of 3D versus 2D arguments. Thanks so much!

thunderforce · 11-14-2011, 04:07 PM

We should have a 3d blu concerts section somewhere , there may not be alot out at the moment but I think there is going to be tons soon .

Brightstar · 11-25-2011, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony P

who coted you as mouthpiece of the public? As a memebr of the public I definetly demanded HD (and so BD) long before BD came out. As for 3D the public always wants something better and since they go to watch 3D movies I am guessing they want 3D.

As for people that just bought 2D sets, if they are happy with them then they can continue watching them and others that want 3D now can buy new 3D TVs. why is taht a bad thing. No one is forcing anyone to buy anything.

The truth is 3D is hear to stay weather you like it or not. The good thing about 3D blu ray is normal blu rays have come down in price. (new movies)

The only thing with blu ray is you have to buy a 3d blu ray and tv to watch the extres e.g transformes, cars 2,

3D is where the big money is and hollywood know that

PaulGo · 01-05-2012, 08:34 PM

Why 3D TV Went From CES Darling to Consumer Reject

3D television was heralded as the breakthrough technology of the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show. Hot on the heels of James Cameron’s eye-opening Avatar, 3D HDTVs were everywhere on the show floor.

One year later, at CES 2011, 3D was back again — this time iterating. We saw bigger 3D HDTVs, 3D displays that didn’t require special glasses, and camcorders that captured 3D content.

But where is 3D now? It’s certainly not showing up big on our CES 2012 radar, and now looks like over-hyped technology in hindsight — especially to those of us who always thought 3D’s natural home was in the movie theater, not the living room.

Indeed, a variety of obstacles — high prices, a lack of 3D content, and uncomfortable viewing experiences — have kept 3D TV adoption in the single digits nationwide. Manufacturers and content providers are working to address these issues, but one has to wonder if 3D was nothing but a flash in the CES pan — a technology story rather than anything consumers actually wanted.

Full article at:

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/...-d-technology/

PaulGo · 01-05-2012, 08:35 PM

I feel the main reason for 3D not taking off in the US is the way they displays for 3D were set up and the lack of content.

In most locations the glasses were broken of the setup was not working properly which led people to believe it was trouble prone technology.

Instead of making hot content such as Avatar 3D available for purchase the content was locked up in exclusive deals which dampened the enthusiasm to purchase an expensive product where very little content was available.

My_Two_Cents · 01-05-2012, 09:01 PM

This ought to be fun to watch.

nycomet · 01-05-2012, 09:30 PM

Lack of 3D content is what made 3D stumble.

Had Avatar 3D been commercially released instead of being a Panasonic exclusive, the story today might be different.

I went 3D in November 2011 because of lower prices and because of the development of passive 3D technology. In addition, there was FINALLY a decent supply of commercial 3D blu-rays being released.

Is it too late for a commercial released of Avatar to become a game changer? I think so.

Can Avatar 2 and 3 (in 3D), the two Peter Jackson Hobbit 3D movies, Cameron's 3D release of Titanic -- and the first 3D release of Star Wars energize the 3D arena?

Only time will tell.

Will 3D TV fizzle out? Let's hope not. Personally, I enjoy watching 3D blu-rays at home.

PaulGo · 01-05-2012, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nycomet

Personally, I enjoy watching 3D blu-rays at home.

I do too! I also enjoy playing 3D PS3 games.

carterk88 · 01-05-2012, 11:12 PM

My wife and I enjoy a good 3D movie at home every once in awhile. It does get uncomfortable after a little bit but usually by that time the movie is almost or already over. I do wish the price of 3D movies would come down. I've got some good deals on most of the 3D movies I own but the average price in most stores (around $30) is just ridiculous.

keb33509 · 01-05-2012, 11:45 PM

Haha, consumer reject... LG is going to promote their 84" 4k2k 3D LED at CES next week. It is passive and capable of 1080p 3D, hence the need for 4k. It is also capable of up-converting 1080p to 4k. Once this thing goes mainstream I would buy it in a heartbeat. Good old ultra-high def.

R3P0 · 01-06-2012, 12:52 AM

3D isn't a fad its just not refined properly, when I go watch 3D in IMAX it always looks good, colors are a bit washed out through the glasses and it gives me a headache from time to time that's the problem.

Once the Glasses-less tech becomes more popular and less expensive and you don't have to be looking directly at it from the front of the TV, I think its going to be a very good option, the problem is they brought the tech out and it sucked when they did it initially.

nycomet · 01-06-2012, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R3P0

3D isn't a fad its just not refined properly, when I go watch 3D in IMAX it always looks good, colors are a bit washed out through the glasses and it gives me a headache from time to time that's the problem.

My set is the passive LG 55LW5600. When I watch 3D movies, it seems that the LG TV compensates for the tint of the glasses by cranking up the overall brightness of the picture.

However, when wearing the lightweight, battery-free passive glasses (just like the ones used in theaters for 3D movies), the tint of the glasses make the on-screen 3D picture appear the way it does when watching regular 2D movies or TV. I cannot detect any loss of color at all. Nothing appears washed out.

I am guessing that you are using active shutter glasses. It seems that active shutter does, in fact, cause many people to develop headaches (and not JUST when viewing 3D movies - no offense).

With passive glasses, there is no flicker, no signal to connect to the 3D TV, they are lighter and extremely affordable compared to active shutter glasses. They do not require a power source (no batteries). They just work!

doctorD · 01-06-2012, 06:16 PM

Exclusive manufacturer 3D glasses to start and their prices definitely did not help. I said from day 1 that this was going to hurt the technology which I actually enjoy. Yeah it can appear to be a gimmick but when done real well it makes for an enjoyable experience.

Blu-Dog · 01-07-2012, 12:17 AM

There is very little quality content - and it's much higher in price. After watching the latest demo setups in various venues, it's just not that impressive. Especially with "conversions", the sliding cutout look of most offerings just doesn't look that great.

I think there will be a second generation of 3-D, possibly without electric glasses, and that may turn things around. But the prices have to drop - they've positioned prices as a premium upgrade, and for the content offered, it will remain a niche market for a long time.

01-05-2012, 08:34 PM	#450
PaulGo Power Member Top contributor Member since:Aug 2007 Location:North Potomac, MD	"Why 3D TV Went From CES Darling to Consumer Reject" Article Why 3D TV Went From CES Darling to Consumer Reject 3D television was heralded as the breakthrough technology of the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show. Hot on the heels of James Cameron’s eye-opening Avatar, 3D HDTVs were everywhere on the show floor. One year later, at CES 2011, 3D was back again — this time iterating. We saw bigger 3D HDTVs, 3D displays that didn’t require special glasses, and camcorders that captured 3D content. But where is 3D now? It’s certainly not showing up big on our CES 2012 radar, and now looks like over-hyped technology in hindsight — especially to those of us who always thought 3D’s natural home was in the movie theater, not the living room. Indeed, a variety of obstacles — high prices, a lack of 3D content, and uncomfortable viewing experiences — have kept 3D TV adoption in the single digits nationwide. Manufacturers and content providers are working to address these issues, but one has to wonder if 3D was nothing but a flash in the CES pan — a technology story rather than anything consumers actually wanted. Full article at: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/...-d-technology/

08-22-2011, 03:56 PM	#441
STARSCREAM Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Feb 2008 Location:Dagobah Blu-ray collection:148 Trading Score:67	I think 3D video games are awesome. The added depth it gives to some of the games is really outstanding and is way more immersive.

08-23-2011, 02:25 PM	#442
Red's got the Blu's Power Member Member since:Aug 2011 Location:Earth Blu-ray collection:437 DVD collection:68 Trading Score:254	Just ran across this article where Scorsese, Coppola and Spielberg give their thoughts on 3D. The writer of the article struck me as anti-3D and although it is a few weeks old thought some of you might enjoy the read.

08-24-2011, 02:00 AM	#444
Lovemy3D Blu-ray Guru Member since:May 2010 Blu-ray reviews:2	Yes, very interesting. Thank you.

10-13-2011, 02:16 PM	#445
threefiftyrocket Blu-ray Guru Member since:Apr 2009 Location:Carmel, IN Blu-ray collection:478 Blu-ray reviews:1 Trading Score:3	I just have a question about 3D blu rays and such, hopefully its just a simple yes or no answer. I have a friend who has a 3D blu player, but his TV is only 2D. If we pop in a 3D blu ray such as the new Pirates 3D blu ray, but it is on a 2D screen, will his player down convert it to 2D so it just looks like the 2D version? I'm curious because I don't have a 3D player and might just give him the 3D version if it will work. Sorry I'm a noob when it comes to the 3D stuff. Thanks for your replies!

11-14-2011, 04:07 PM	#448
thunderforce Power Member Member since:Aug 2009 Location:Windsor Ontario Canada Blu-ray collection:146 Blu-ray reviews:2	We should have a 3d blu concerts section somewhere , there may not be alot out at the moment but I think there is going to be tons soon .

01-05-2012, 08:35 PM	#451
PaulGo Power Member Top contributor Member since:Aug 2007 Location:North Potomac, MD	I feel the main reason for 3D not taking off in the US is the way they displays for 3D were set up and the lack of content. In most locations the glasses were broken of the setup was not working properly which led people to believe it was trouble prone technology. Instead of making hot content such as Avatar 3D available for purchase the content was locked up in exclusive deals which dampened the enthusiasm to purchase an expensive product where very little content was available.

01-05-2012, 09:01 PM	#452
My_Two_Cents Blu-ray Knight Top contributor Member since:Dec 2007 Location:Wherever I may roam.... Home Theater Gallery:40 4K collection:35 Blu-ray collection:507 DVD collection:19 Blu-ray reviews: 1 Trading Score:4	This ought to be fun to watch.

01-05-2012, 09:30 PM	#453
nycomet Blu-ray Knight Top contributor Member since:Dec 2007 Location:Long Island, NY, USA ; I enjoy watching 3D blu-rays; 41 Blufans steels so far Home Theater Gallery:11 Blu-ray collection:1344 DVD collection:55 Digital collection:246 Blu-ray reviews:40 Trading Score:343	Lack of 3D content is what made 3D stumble. Had Avatar 3D been commercially released instead of being a Panasonic exclusive, the story today might be different. I went 3D in November 2011 because of lower prices and because of the development of passive 3D technology. In addition, there was FINALLY a decent supply of commercial 3D blu-rays being released. Is it too late for a commercial released of Avatar to become a game changer? I think so. Can Avatar 2 and 3 (in 3D), the two Peter Jackson Hobbit 3D movies, Cameron's 3D release of Titanic -- and the first 3D release of Star Wars energize the 3D arena? Only time will tell. Will 3D TV fizzle out? Let's hope not. Personally, I enjoy watching 3D blu-rays at home.

01-05-2012, 11:12 PM	#455
carterk88 Member Member since:May 2011 Blu-ray collection:206	My wife and I enjoy a good 3D movie at home every once in awhile. It does get uncomfortable after a little bit but usually by that time the movie is almost or already over. I do wish the price of 3D movies would come down. I've got some good deals on most of the 3D movies I own but the average price in most stores (around $30) is just ridiculous.

01-05-2012, 11:45 PM	#456
keb33509 Special Member Member since:Aug 2011 Blu-ray collection:442 Trading Score:75	Haha, consumer reject... LG is going to promote their 84" 4k2k 3D LED at CES next week. It is passive and capable of 1080p 3D, hence the need for 4k. It is also capable of up-converting 1080p to 4k. Once this thing goes mainstream I would buy it in a heartbeat. Good old ultra-high def.

01-06-2012, 12:52 AM	#457
R3P0 Blu-ray Duke Member since:Jun 2008 Blu-ray collection:46 Trading Score:1	3D isn't a fad its just not refined properly, when I go watch 3D in IMAX it always looks good, colors are a bit washed out through the glasses and it gives me a headache from time to time that's the problem. Once the Glasses-less tech becomes more popular and less expensive and you don't have to be looking directly at it from the front of the TV, I think its going to be a very good option, the problem is they brought the tech out and it sucked when they did it initially.

01-06-2012, 06:16 PM	#459
doctorD Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Jun 2007 Location:Redmond, WA Home Theater Gallery:47 4K collection:397 Blu-ray collection:1723 Blu-ray reviews: 12 Trading Score:1	Exclusive manufacturer 3D glasses to start and their prices definitely did not help. I said from day 1 that this was going to hurt the technology which I actually enjoy. Yeah it can appear to be a gimmick but when done real well it makes for an enjoyable experience.

01-07-2012, 12:17 AM	#460
Blu-Dog Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Dec 2007 Location:Lancaster, CA Home Theater Gallery:9 Blu-ray collection:1 Blu-ray reviews:1	There is very little quality content - and it's much higher in price. After watching the latest demo setups in various venues, it's just not that impressive. Especially with "conversions", the sliding cutout look of most offerings just doesn't look that great. I think there will be a second generation of 3-D, possibly without electric glasses, and that may turn things around. But the prices have to drop - they've positioned prices as a premium upgrade, and for the content offered, it will remain a niche market for a long time.

Best 3D Blu-ray Deals