|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $67.11 | ![]() $35.00 | ![]() $32.28 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 | ![]() $14.37 | ![]() $23.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $49.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $49.99 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
I expect 4k media to be introduced with the PS4 (probably Christmas 2013, early 2014.) I also expect another format war with Blu versus RED all over again. If this is the last generation of optical media, it is going to be some swan song. 4k tv, 4k players, lovely full 3D films/games and hopefully a nice 4k headset/visor from Sony! Consider me sold! All the village idiots can watch their streamed crap on their smartphones and tablets, i will be playing to a different tune.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Im skeptical we will see 4k discs in 2013. For Blu-Ray 3D for example the first discs arrived on the market in June 2010 roughly two years after Panasonic submitted there proposal for a standard and that required no new codec or disc structure two things 4k discs will require.
So many questions need to be answered. How will it achieve the needed capacity? What will the format be called? What new codecs will be used? Lots of questions and in order to avoid another messy format war the tech companies are going to have to come to a concensus. That will require time. Id rather 4k discs get delayed for a single unified format then launch earlier and deal with another format war |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]()
Hardly.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Pro-B Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 01-17-2012 at 11:26 PM. Reason: Typo |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Jul 2007
|
![]()
Are there going to be 200 GB Blu Ray discs to go along with them? Overcompressed 100 GB BDXL 2k won't be much of a bump.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
200GB discs are 2006's technology:
http://www.slashgear.com/tdk-shows-o...y-disc-011390/ Why to stop at 200GB? http://www.digitaltrends.com/computi...a-single-disc/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I really think something along the lines of a 3X the capacity of current bluray discs is needed so 75gb at least for bare bones discs and 150gb as a max capacity disc at a minimum. 200gb would be better but I don't know if really needed.
Aren't 100gb blurays already on the market for recording purposes? Granted no format war needed, Toshiba is apparently pushing 4K bluray as well. There is a considerable amount of content on the market for 4K already by all major studios as they have done 4K masters for numerous films for thier blurays. This is easily already in the 300-500 title range. Spare me the studios won't release their pristine 4K masters argument as it is horrendously invalid. Studios since 2006 have been releasing thier pristine 2K studio masters in many films where only a 2K DI exists. This applies to many films from 2000-2010. The copy you have at home is the identical pristine master they have at the studio. Penton-man has already totally derailed that argument. The real question remains just how much of an upgrade it will be? Seeing Star Wars 77 on bluray I wasn't exactly blown away. The dvd was stunning but then again it came from an HD master! If the bluray came from a 4K master I am sure it would have stunned as well. IMO 4K masters used on bluray easily outshine thier 2K or HD counterparts. Very few 4K blurays will come from a 6K or 8K master. It will be a niche format much like laserdisc with glasses free HD and the best PQ available I am sure I will jump on the bandwagon. Anamorphic 21:9 4K bluray won't happen as it simply won't deliver 5,120 pixels across the screen. Now I must say I would prefer it's native 17:9 aspect ratio similiar to the current projectors on the market, in cinemas and on the 152 in. Panasonic. It simply works better for film and many films are simply cropped from 2K to 1.9K. The native aspect ratio would avoid all that and offer a little wider picture which would be new and cool. Last edited by PRO-630HD; 01-17-2012 at 02:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|