|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $14.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $54.45 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Blu-ray Ninja
![]() Jul 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
The way I've been led to believe, as long as the total audio streams total less than 8Mbps, then the 40Mbps peak is safe in all instances if we're just talking about bandwidth usage and had infinite storage capacity. How, then, does the video ABR decrease based on the audio codec used in this example? Is it because of capacity issues (i.e. PCM 5.1 24/48 eats up a lot more space, and therefore less capacity can be allocated, making the max sustainable ABR lower?). Is there a piece of the puzzle that I'm missing somewhere, or is the video ABR difference you mentioned above simply due to storage capacity limitation changes based on the space consumed by the audio? |
||
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Ask questions to Compression Engineer insider "drmpeg" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 145 | 01-31-2024 04:00 PM |
"Club Penton" - Ask questions to Hollywood insider "Penton-Man" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 19563 | 04-15-2012 03:19 PM |
Ask questions to Blu-ray Music insider "Alexander J" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 280 | 07-04-2011 06:18 PM |
Ask questions to Sony Pictures Entertainment insider "paidgeek" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 958 | 04-06-2008 05:48 PM |
Ask questions to Sony Computer Entertainment insider "SCE Insider" | Insider Discussion | Ben | 13 | 01-21-2008 09:45 PM |
|
|