|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $11.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $27.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.37 | ![]() $9.55 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $8.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.78 | ![]() $29.99 |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
![]() Apr 2011
Brisbane, Australia
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for sharing your memories, my mental files always had the fact listed that 50's 3D screenings were anaglyph. I know 80's one's were, because when I got my anaglyph tattoo the tattooist (who was a Kiwi, so I dunno if they were screened differently throughout the world) got all nostalgic over the glasses. It's great finding out you were wrong, and erasing that fact. It stems from that classic picture, you've seen it (I bet you're in it!), of all those fifties folk in the cinema wearing their 3D glasses. The picture is B&W and I always "saw" anaglyph glasses. Now, they are cardboard right? Using polarized lenses, and projected using two 35mm projectors, onto a silver screen? I bet there was some 3D hate back then that stemmed from two other sources; 1. Bad 3D in the film source, from lazy directors who didn't notice a misalignment until the dailies screening, and gave up on re-shooting the scene. 2. Bad 3D in the cinema, from lazy projectionists who misaligned the PJs and didn't adjust the image when he/she realized it was wrong. And I know you weren't a cinema going dude in the fifties (at least, I think... where's my calculator?), but you seem to know more about this stuff than I, the guy who judged 50's cinema from the B&W photo on the wall at McDonalds... Last edited by AmrlKJaneway; 04-08-2013 at 02:24 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|