|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $34.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $11.99 54 min ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $35.33 |
![]() |
#481 |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]()
All theoretical. One would have to assume that space was the problem for any faults in the first place.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#482 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
Not always the case, but true for the most part.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#483 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
http://ghostbustersnews.com/2013/04/...u-ray-release/ http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/technol.../xvycc_01.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#484 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
Given the same compression parameters, higher bitrate will yield better quality quite non-theoretically. Whether the improvement can be seen without pixel-peeping is another question, since Sony tends to do a pretty good job with their encodes. For bandwidth-intensive material like, say, Taxi Driver with all its grain, going from ~23mbps to 40mbps or whatever the limit is, everything else equal, would certainly yield some degree of perceivable difference.
Last edited by 42041; 04-09-2013 at 08:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#485 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#487 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
Now the only piece of information is whether the original Ghostbusters BD was sourced from a 4K transfer or a 2K, and whether or not that is any different than what we are seeing later this year. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#488 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Colour depth (Deep Colour) has nothing to do with extended gamut (xvYCC) as its still 8-bit. You are correct in saying Blu-ray's are encoded with YCbCr 4:2:0 8-bit, but xvYCC just makes use of the footroom/headroom to use for the extended gamut, thus all devices need to support it. I am no expert, so it would be nice to have some proper clarification on all this. As from that quote of the special features, 'expanded colour' is asterisks with the note being, "Expanded color requires xvYCC-compatible TV and Blu-ray player". Perhaps its just a ploy to get people to buy kit marked with x.v colour. Edit: H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 version 6 allows for extended gamut, and HDMI 1.3 and above provides a mechanism to negotiate if a display supports it, and the range that it can support. Last edited by Tech-UK; 04-09-2013 at 11:24 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#491 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
So, basically, from what I'm gathering, there's a chance that the Ghostbusters 4K Blu-Ray will be a noticeable improvement over the current release, but also a chance it'll be more or less the same in terms of visuals?
Awesome. Well, I guess I'm still taking the plunge, but if I end up getting burned, I doubt I'll go for any more of these 4K Blu-Rays in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
#492 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#493 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Technically, it would be my first time dipping, since I got the previous Ghostbusters Blu-Ray as a birthday gift a few years back. That Blu-Ray was okay, don't get me wrong, but it definitely left a lot of room for improvement in the visual department.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#496 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Regarding Ghostbusters. The picture quality isn't the problem on the current Blu, it has fantastic detail. It's the heavy contrast boosting that's the problem. I have a hunch that Sony will sort this problem out on the new release, seeing as they tried to fix it as much as possible on the current Blu. The damage was already done though, so the only way that Sony can fix it, is by rescanning the film from scratch.
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/404.php As you can see in this screenshot, it's not as blown out as the DVD but it's still far too bright. There's some serious highlight clipping going on in that scene. Fingers crossed that the new transfer fixed this problem. |
![]() |
![]() |
#497 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]() Quote:
That doesn't mean other 4K remasters won't look fantastic, it all depends on what material they have to work with. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#498 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
As long as it's an improvement, and fixes the contrast issues, I'll have faith in this 4K Remaster line.
Last edited by Metallix87; 04-10-2013 at 12:47 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#499 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
These Blu-rays have no more resolution than what they had before. They are still 1080p24. Sony is saying that they are from new 4K masters (doubt it) and have expanded color gamuts (extremely doubt it). They are also claiming that they are primed for upconversion to 4K for their new 4K displays. So if your Blu-ray player can upconvert to 4K or you have a 4K display it will simply scale the 1080p movie to 4K (which it could do with ANY Blu-ray out there). If you have a 1080p display you are going to watch it in 1080p just like you would any other Blu-ray. If a new 4K scan was indeed done there is a chance you will see an improvement in detail even with 1080p playback. Most of the titles mentioned were already mastered from a 4K source the first time they were released on Blu-ray (Taxi Driver, Spiderman, Total Recall, etc). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#500 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Your machine might be able to upscale to 4K, but since your TV is not 4K anyway, you're not getting 4K anything. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|