As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
19 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
4 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
12 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
14 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
4 hrs ago
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
10 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
54 min ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2013, 08:13 PM   #481
IndyMLVC IndyMLVC is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
IndyMLVC's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
New York City, NY
296
738
58
754
2
62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MifuneFan View Post
Is it not possible that there could be improvements from getting rid of the extras and filling te entire disc with just the movie? Assuming that's what they do, a smaller compression should lead to higher bitrates and at least a slightly better PQ .
All theoretical. One would have to assume that space was the problem for any faults in the first place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:14 PM   #482
deltasun deltasun is offline
Blu-ray Count
 
deltasun's Avatar
 
Mar 2011
5593 ft above sea level
122
2899
36
1
1
1205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MifuneFan View Post
Is it not possible that there could be improvements from getting rid of the extras and filling te entire disc with just the movie? Assuming that's what they do, a smaller compression should lead to higher bitrates and at least a slightly better PQ .
Not always the case, but true for the most part.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:21 PM   #483
Tech-UK Tech-UK is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Tech-UK's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
UK
96
215
1167
20
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering View Post
Where are you getting this from? The BD spec is 4:2:0 YCbCr and I've been told these titles won't be any different. The "improvements" to color are made on the authoring side which I take with a grain of salt considering that I heard from the guy that does this stuff from Sony said they were already doing new stuff for their color conversions that improved color performance well before they even announced the VW1000ES. I am under the opinion that these are going to be EXACTLY the same as the transfers available now with new branding to suggest that based on their source files they look great upscaled on Sony 4K displays, nothing more nothing less. I would LOVE to be proved wrong on this by the way.
And so it shall still be.

http://ghostbustersnews.com/2013/04/...u-ray-release/

http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/technol.../xvycc_01.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:23 PM   #484
42041 42041 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Oct 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyMLVC View Post
All theoretical. One would have to assume that space was the problem for any faults in the first place.
Given the same compression parameters, higher bitrate will yield better quality quite non-theoretically. Whether the improvement can be seen without pixel-peeping is another question, since Sony tends to do a pretty good job with their encodes. For bandwidth-intensive material like, say, Taxi Driver with all its grain, going from ~23mbps to 40mbps or whatever the limit is, everything else equal, would certainly yield some degree of perceivable difference.

Last edited by 42041; 04-09-2013 at 08:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:49 PM   #485
bigdaddyhorse bigdaddyhorse is online now
Blu-ray Knight
 
bigdaddyhorse's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
SE MI.
152
1242
1148
5
103
Default

That second article makes it sound like it just uses different formulas and equations to get a 15% better result at best. I'm not gonna spend what I could get a new car for on 15% better color that I probably can't even tell is better without direct comparison. Of course, I could be reading it all wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:51 PM   #486
Tech-UK Tech-UK is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Tech-UK's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
UK
96
215
1167
20
23
Default

Interesting read here:

http://www.spectracal.com/downloads/...ld%20gamut.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:19 PM   #487
Kris Deering Kris Deering is offline
Power Member
 
Kris Deering's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Pacific Northwest
400
131
Default

Grain of salt. For one trying to do an encode of a feature length movie in xvycc would entail a MASSIVE amount of compression. The reason movies are 4:2:0 YCbCr isn't because higher color depth isn't available, it is because of compression and space. Sony hasn't magically come up with a new standard for compression and added it to the Blu-ray spec, the process they are talking about has to do with the mastering side and they've been doing it for a few years already. Now they could try to push the fact that their BD players and TVs can do deep color output, but that would be nothing new since that has been around on just about every brand from the beginning. But there is no way these discs are encoded in a wider and higher bit depth colorspace. Again, the BD spec for video won't allow it.

Now the only piece of information is whether the original Ghostbusters BD was sourced from a 4K transfer or a 2K, and whether or not that is any different than what we are seeing later this year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:13 PM   #488
Tech-UK Tech-UK is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Tech-UK's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
UK
96
215
1167
20
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering View Post
Grain of salt. For one trying to do an encode of a feature length movie in xvycc would entail a MASSIVE amount of compression. The reason movies are 4:2:0 YCbCr isn't because higher color depth isn't available, it is because of compression and space. Sony hasn't magically come up with a new standard for compression and added it to the Blu-ray spec, the process they are talking about has to do with the mastering side and they've been doing it for a few years already. Now they could try to push the fact that their BD players and TVs can do deep color output, but that would be nothing new since that has been around on just about every brand from the beginning. But there is no way these discs are encoded in a wider and higher bit depth colorspace. Again, the BD spec for video won't allow it.

Now the only piece of information is whether the original Ghostbusters BD was sourced from a 4K transfer or a 2K, and whether or not that is any different than what we are seeing later this year.

Colour depth (Deep Colour) has nothing to do with extended gamut (xvYCC) as its still 8-bit. You are correct in saying Blu-ray's are encoded with YCbCr 4:2:0 8-bit, but xvYCC just makes use of the footroom/headroom to use for the extended gamut, thus all devices need to support it.

I am no expert, so it would be nice to have some proper clarification on all this. As from that quote of the special features, 'expanded colour' is asterisks with the note being, "Expanded color requires xvYCC-compatible TV and Blu-ray player". Perhaps its just a ploy to get people to buy kit marked with x.v colour.

Edit:

H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 version 6 allows for extended gamut, and HDMI 1.3 and above provides a mechanism to negotiate if a display supports it, and the range that it can support.

Last edited by Tech-UK; 04-09-2013 at 11:24 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:13 PM   #489
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7044
4040
Default

o/~ It's not enough to advertise a famous star they know.
If you want to get the crowds to come around
You've gotta have glorious Sonycolor,
Breathtaking 4Ktvscope and
Elevenpointseven sooooound. ~\o
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:19 PM   #490
Love Blu-Ray Love Blu-Ray is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2012
321
Default

I have a 4K Blu-ray player but will it show 4K on my TV since it is not 4K?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:21 PM   #491
Metallix87 Metallix87 is offline
Expert Member
 
Metallix87's Avatar
 
Feb 2013
New Jersey
48
1789
3
Default

So, basically, from what I'm gathering, there's a chance that the Ghostbusters 4K Blu-Ray will be a noticeable improvement over the current release, but also a chance it'll be more or less the same in terms of visuals?

Awesome. Well, I guess I'm still taking the plunge, but if I end up getting burned, I doubt I'll go for any more of these 4K Blu-Rays in the future.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:25 PM   #492
Love Blu-Ray Love Blu-Ray is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2012
321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallix87 View Post
So, basically, from what I'm gathering, there's a chance that the Ghostbusters 4K Blu-Ray will be a noticeable improvement over the current release, but also a chance it'll be more or less the same in terms of visuals?

Awesome. Well, I guess I'm still taking the plunge, but if I end up getting burned, I doubt I'll go for any more of these 4K Blu-Rays in the future.
I think it would be best to hear some reviews of the 4K Blu-rays before double dipping on them
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:29 PM   #493
Metallix87 Metallix87 is offline
Expert Member
 
Metallix87's Avatar
 
Feb 2013
New Jersey
48
1789
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Blu-Ray View Post
I think it would be best to hear some reviews of the 4K Blu-rays before double dipping on them
Technically, it would be my first time dipping, since I got the previous Ghostbusters Blu-Ray as a birthday gift a few years back. That Blu-Ray was okay, don't get me wrong, but it definitely left a lot of room for improvement in the visual department.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:33 PM   #494
Trekkie313 Trekkie313 is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Trekkie313's Avatar
 
Nov 2010
Ohio
2
206
1650
547
156
5
59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Blu-Ray View Post
I have a 4K Blu-ray player but will it show 4K on my TV since it is not 4K?
If people can notice the PQ difference between a DVD and Blu-ray on a CRT set, then you should be fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:48 PM   #495
HuggyBear73 HuggyBear73 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
HuggyBear73's Avatar
 
May 2011
128
Default

I'll take a chance with GHOSTBUSTERS and GLORY I guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:51 PM   #496
The Fallen Deity The Fallen Deity is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
The Fallen Deity's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
Scotland
348
1226
112
Default

Regarding Ghostbusters. The picture quality isn't the problem on the current Blu, it has fantastic detail. It's the heavy contrast boosting that's the problem. I have a hunch that Sony will sort this problem out on the new release, seeing as they tried to fix it as much as possible on the current Blu. The damage was already done though, so the only way that Sony can fix it, is by rescanning the film from scratch.

http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/404.php

As you can see in this screenshot, it's not as blown out as the DVD but it's still far too bright. There's some serious highlight clipping going on in that scene.

Fingers crossed that the new transfer fixed this problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:53 PM   #497
42041 42041 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Oct 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallix87 View Post
So, basically, from what I'm gathering, there's a chance that the Ghostbusters 4K Blu-Ray will be a noticeable improvement over the current release, but also a chance it'll be more or less the same in terms of visuals?

Awesome. Well, I guess I'm still taking the plunge, but if I end up getting burned, I doubt I'll go for any more of these 4K Blu-Rays in the future.
It'll undoubtedly be an improvement, but it might not look as good as you might expect, just by virtue of how the film was photographed.
That doesn't mean other 4K remasters won't look fantastic, it all depends on what material they have to work with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:55 PM   #498
Metallix87 Metallix87 is offline
Expert Member
 
Metallix87's Avatar
 
Feb 2013
New Jersey
48
1789
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
It'll undoubtedly be an improvement, but it might not look as good as you might expect, just by virtue of how the film was photographed.
That doesn't mean other 4K remasters won't look fantastic, it all depends on what material they have to work with.
As long as it's an improvement, and fixes the contrast issues, I'll have faith in this 4K Remaster line.

Last edited by Metallix87; 04-10-2013 at 12:47 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 12:44 AM   #499
Kris Deering Kris Deering is offline
Power Member
 
Kris Deering's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Pacific Northwest
400
131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Blu-Ray View Post
I have a 4K Blu-ray player but will it show 4K on my TV since it is not 4K?
And so it begins. This is exactly like when upconverting DVD players boasted 1080p outputs and people thought that meant they were watching HDTV.

These Blu-rays have no more resolution than what they had before. They are still 1080p24. Sony is saying that they are from new 4K masters (doubt it) and have expanded color gamuts (extremely doubt it). They are also claiming that they are primed for upconversion to 4K for their new 4K displays.

So if your Blu-ray player can upconvert to 4K or you have a 4K display it will simply scale the 1080p movie to 4K (which it could do with ANY Blu-ray out there). If you have a 1080p display you are going to watch it in 1080p just like you would any other Blu-ray. If a new 4K scan was indeed done there is a chance you will see an improvement in detail even with 1080p playback. Most of the titles mentioned were already mastered from a 4K source the first time they were released on Blu-ray (Taxi Driver, Spiderman, Total Recall, etc).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 01:01 AM   #500
blu-ray_girl_fan blu-ray_girl_fan is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2009
1
87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love Blu-Ray View Post
I have a 4K Blu-ray player but will it show 4K on my TV since it is not 4K?
No, you don't have a 4K player since the current Blu-ray format is limited to 1080p.

Your machine might be able to upscale to 4K, but since your TV is not 4K anyway, you're not getting 4K anything.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 PM.