|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() £49.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £22.99 | ![]() £39.99 | ![]() £30.60 | ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £19.99 1 day ago
| ![]() £21.86 9 hrs ago
| ![]() £40.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() £19.99 1 day ago
| ![]() £14.99 | ![]() £10.99 |
![]() |
#22 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
I think my point (and that of others) is to those people who are just buying for the sake of having a 'complete' collection by a certain distributor or marketing brand. Which, as I noted in my post, means that I'm sure a lot of them end up with very fine collections - certainly it's better for them to, say, collect MoC than the Sony Classics Range and end up with M as a completist blind buy than The Da Vinci Code. But some people take such ownership over a brand that they get angry when they release something they don't like because it interferes with their collection - they have to either skip one and 'ruin' it or buy something they don't like. That's a step beyond for me - having to complete a 'set' of disconnected films simply because of the logo on the spine is an odd motivation and a bizarre thing to become obsessive about. (Going further with the ownership people take over a brand, you only have to look at what happens when someone feels Arrow should release a film they like - and what happens when they have no plans to but instead release films that don't appeal to that person - to see how petulant people can be) Last edited by Buddy Ackerman; 04-09-2014 at 02:55 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
blu-ray, collection, film, movie |
|
|