Star Trek:Season 6 - Does it warrant a Replacement Program?

[octagon]

Originally Posted by KaineKinetic

Added another one.
There are now 5 so far.

Heh, no offense but that fifth one tipped me from 'don't vote' to 'no'

[HDMe]

In the scheme of things, I'd say no.

Season 1 had some major gaffes so they fixed some minor ones as well... but a handful of minor things wouldn't drive me nuts. These are so much better than what we had before, and they have fixed other things in these versions, so if a few minor things are there I'm ok if they don't.

IF they do, I'd apply for the replacements... but I wouldn't line up with fire and pitchforks demanding it.

[jscoggins]

Originally Posted by octagon

Heh, no offense but that fifth one tipped me from 'don't vote' to 'no'

Misplaced or misdirected stereo effects bother me more than visual effects, which I can always forgive due to the age of a movie or TV show. On the other hand, incorrect stereo effects make me think I have some sort of audio dyslexia.

[OneWayFilms]

If the mistake was also on the original broadcast, like the beam NOT coming from the deflector array, then why would they be obligated to fix it now?

Not sure about the other issues that were NOT in the original broadcast, but the goofs sound too mild to warrant an entire replacement program.

[Gold Ranger]

Originally Posted by OneWayFilms

If the mistake was also on the original broadcast, like the beam NOT coming from the deflector array, then why would they be obligated to fix it now?

Not sure about the other issues that were NOT in the original broadcast, but the goofs sound too mild to warrant an entire replacement program.

Then why did they fix the other errors?