|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $67.11 1 hr ago
| ![]() $14.37 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.00 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $27.54 1 hr ago
| ![]() $49.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $31.99 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
I view Auro as more of an extension of 5.1, while Atmos reinvents how movie sound is planned and used. I think of traditional 5.1 as an equivalent to 480p video. It's a standard that can be done either really well (point in case: The Lego Movie) or not so well (any Michael Bay film). Auro 11.1 is basically like 1080p video, it has all the aesthetics of a 5.1 mix, but with added depth and clarity, as well as minimal height activity (too much height is overkill, as stated by Auro experts themselves). I may be a bit biased and a romantacist, but I will say the equivalent to Dolby Atmos is 70mm film. There, I said it. However, the diet version of Atmos for home consumers is like 720p video, at least what I've read about it. Oddly enough, am I the only one who thinks Diet Auro will sound better than Diet Atmos? Just the 9.1 Auro configuration seems fine, and there is an odd chance that Auro for the home would be a better solution because you won't lose much from a theatrical 11.1 mix to 9.1 than a theatrical Atmos mix to 9.1.4X whatever. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|