Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition

[Groo The Perverted]

Originally Posted by Gamma_Winstead

Sleeping Dogs certainly shouldn't be 60. The only reason I could see it being 60 if it either completely RE-does the graphics, or if it adds even MORE content.

I'm just not looking forward to games getting remastered. Last of Us? Sure, I can understand. It's a game of the year edition essentially. GTa5 was built with next gen in mind anyways, and we all knew it was coming, kind of like the Hobbit Extended editions. Resident Evil is an update 13 years later, with new content. That all makes sense.

Stuff like Metro, Sleeping Dogs, and Journey just... They just reel of being cash grabs. Especially injustice. That games was barely an upgrade. I was waiting to buy the GotY edition before I bought the original version, so when the ps4 one was revealed it was just Icing on the cake for me. But man... That was a lazy port. Tomb Raider certainly had a graphical upgrade, but all it's dlc was multiplayer based, which no one cared about. It didn't even have new costumes. That shouldn't have been 60.

Metro, the jury is still out on. It at least brings the first game to Sony consoles.

What the hell is wrong with people making money off a product? If the demand is there, and there clearly appears to be because I've seen people excited for some of these releases, and I'm sure the ones I haven't, there are those who want it, why not?

As much as a lot of us were against the $60 Tomb Raider, they clearly sold enough to validate the Sleeping Dogs one. And I assume we'll see the Hitman release soon after that if SD:HD does well.

I dunno, this *****ing about "so and so is a cash grab" just seems like lazy arguing, no offense. OF COURSE it's a cash grab. Everything is a cash grab. If there was no cash to be made, there would be no products. Or very very few products anyway.