|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.95 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $41.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.96 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.89 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $7.00 40 min ago
| ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
IMO, it looked far worse than Ron Howard's "Far and Away" (1992) and that film pretty much killed any hope for further 65mm shooting. The only 65mm after that was "Baraka" (1993), "Hamlet" (1996), "Samsara" (2012) and "The Master" (2012) (aside from IMAX origination). And regardless of the merits of this camera, for theaters who are still projecting in 2K, I don't think the image is going to look any better. You're still going to get the "screen door effect" in projection. You might be able to tell the difference if they're using a 4K projector. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | in2video2 (11-07-2014) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|