|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $30.50 1 hr ago
| ![]() $13.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
Apr 2007
New Mexico
|
![]()
Hello,
I have owned the PS3 and a 61" JVC 1080p tv for over 4 months now. I have a number of BR dvd's and some are very impressive while others just make me say "WTF?". A good BR to buy is Blazing Saddles, even though it was filmed in 1974 it is one of the better remasterings that I have seen. It was the first DVD I ever bought and the first BR. CRAP that I own in BR is Fifth Element ( I know they are remastering it) and Tears of the Sun. Stay away from thoughs. I am very very impressed with the PS3 now with it's new firmware update I can now upscale my regular DVD's to 1080P. Anyone have any advice of other BR DVD's to stay away from because of the crappy remastering? Last edited by GoldenRedux; 05-31-2007 at 02:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Knight
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Active Member
Dec 2006
|
![]()
I was fairly unimpressed with parts of American Psycho. Most of it was ok, but there are some parts where the MPEG-2 compression is quite noticeable.
Still a good movie. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
That's odd, they listed Scanner Darkly as tier 0. I thought some of the unbiased reviewers saw compression artifacts and other small issues on this one. I'm also surprised POT2 was listed above POTC1 as I thought the first had a higher bitrate and better PQ.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Mar 2007
East Molesey, Surrey, UK
|
![]()
'Lady in the Water' is nothing special in terms of picture quality.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Power Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Tears is definately not crap, neither is The Fifth Element... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]()
Fifth Element is Crap.
That's why they are coming out with a remastered so quickly! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Active Member
Apr 2007
New Mexico
|
![]()
What I was trying to get across was that the actual picture quality of 5th element and Tears of the sun were crappy. I have both DVD and BR version of tears and honestly it was hard to tell the differance. I get better quality just upscaling the dvd with the PS3 than I do with the BR. Don't lie to yourself, we are getting short changed on alot of these BR dvd's. Half of the BR I own it is just grain grain grain grain. Sorry, but grain does not equal HD. Young Guns is another bad BR. Good BR's are Blazing Saddles, Ice Age the Meltdown, Rocky Balboa, Flyboys, and most of Planet Earth. I am talking just on quality of the picture, not of the movie.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Site Manager
|
![]()
Sorry, your concept of what "HD" is, is different than mine.
Probably fettastic's tier system is more similar to yours. Now, I do agree that Blazing Saddles (25+ Mb/s VC-1) looks good. I don't think T5E looks as bad as you say compared to 35mm showings (except for the title sequence which looks like a dupe). Also remember that BS' negative has 60% more area than TFE's. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Active Member
Apr 2007
New Mexico
|
![]() Quote:
PS3 V1.08 JVC 61" 61FN97 1080P/w HDMI V1.3 JVC RX-D412 RECIEVER (I have my PS3 hooked up directly to the TV via HDMI and the PS3 hooked up to my reciever via digital optical) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
i agree....i was disappointed with the PQ on american psycho....this one definitely deserves a 50GB re-release soon |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Site Manager
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Special Member
|
![]()
It most certainly doesn't. I think it looks good for what it is. I will be getting the remastered version and setting up a nice a/b comparision to see the differences in the encode. I'm interested to see if the print is cleaned up a bit and see how AVC stacks up against the previous MPEG2 encode. I'm sure Sony is giving this title lots of TLC after the scrutiny that the first one recieved.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Active Member
Apr 2007
New Mexico
|
![]()
If you like TFE that is fine, but I know everyone has at least one BR that they think could have been done better. If you know of a bad BR DVD that we should stay away from, post it here. I own 23 BR's and most have great PQ but there are a few that I think I wasted my money on. Am I the only one that thinks that some BR dvd's are just not worthy of the name and format of bluray????
Remember, we are judging on PQ not the movie. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The Best Actors Worst Movie | Movies | carpaltonnel | 114 | 01-14-2023 01:12 AM |
Worst movie you have ever seen? | Movies | Blu Man | 1742 | 08-31-2017 10:29 PM |
Worst movie ever? | Movies | Batman1980 | 184 | 01-04-2016 03:34 AM |
This might be the worst movie ever, but... | Movies | toef | 42 | 01-15-2010 07:26 PM |
Worst children's movie? | Movies | arrow61095 | 114 | 10-04-2008 10:47 AM |
|
|