|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $23.79 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.97 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#2701 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Finished watching JP III.
Wasn't very impressed with the PQ. It looked quite dull and flat to me, with muted colors and a rather soft and hazy look at times. Some shots were particular soft like one of Laura Dern at the beginning and another of Sam Neill when he has just got out of the plane after landing on the island. Also the reflections of sunlight on persons and objects seemed very low contrast to me, with little to no highlight details present. This was noticable during the scenes in the plane before it crashes for example, many of the jungle scenes in the second half but also when Sam Neill holds the bag with eggs outside the window later on. I saw this in the theater back in 2001 but obviously have forgotten what it looked like. I wonder if this UHD presentation is representative of the theatrical screening? I still love the movie itself though, I would put this one in second place before TLW and JW. That bird cage scene with the pteranodon is great. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | RemingtonSteele (05-25-2018) |
![]() |
#2702 |
Member
|
![]()
You sound like a console gamer but pc people get way better copies so you bash them. We want 4k it says 4k but many are 4k very false advertising. But hey being pro consumer is hated these days but i will not join the hip club of anti consumer practices.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2703 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Sadly, it looks like we'll never truly get a "good" transfer of the first Jurassic Park. Those UHD screenshots from CAH don't look like a step forwards or backwards from the VC-1 2011 1080p disc or the MVC 2013 3D disc, but rather a step sideways. Neither one of them are ideal. If I didn't know any better, I'd say they just used the same exact DNR'd 4K "remaster" as the 3D version...
![]() Last edited by killermike2178; 05-25-2018 at 11:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2704 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2705 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2708 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
I love the film and it looked as sharp as most 35mm films back then. The film stocks had improved since 1993. It also sported a warm, golden look throughout, like the previous two films. The mist-filled scenes were blueish, (not pink) and had a slight purple push. The skin tones were always tanned and healthy, not pale pinkish as on the DVD and 2D BD. Does the JP3 UHD look exactly like this screenshot below, on your TV? JP3 4K Alan on phone.jpg Last edited by Riddhi2011; 05-25-2018 at 01:47 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2710 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Watched JP1. Clearly Universal put very little effort towards this release. It’s not all bad but it’s mostly disappointing. I definitely prefer it over the BD but that’s not saying much. Oh well, at least I onky paid $30 for the set.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#2712 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
I remember it looking rather "bleached". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2713 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2714 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I've a feeling this may have already been answered but I can't find it.
Just been mooching around my local HMV and had a look at a Jurassic World case. The back lists Dolby Vision. Is this a whoopsy on Universal's part of does JW (and the other 3) have DV? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2716 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
Kaminski noted that the stocks he chose for TLW were virtually "grainless". But, for whatever reasons, TLW's 4K transfer escaped the processing that was wrought upon JPs 1 and 3, so ironically enough it's actually the grainiest of all three. NOT that the grain is overbearing or always in your face, it's just got a really pleasing sense of filmic texture to it and doesn't look overtly smudgy and false like those other two. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2719 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I thought JP1 was good in closeups, clearly more detail and a higher resolution but the wide and distant shots were rough. The colour a little washed out overall with only really the clothing and jeeps looking rich, the scenery was underwhelming.
Last edited by Phreakuency; 05-25-2018 at 04:20 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|