As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
1 hr ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
22 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Renfield 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.96
2 hrs ago
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
15 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 day ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Subwoofers
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2009, 11:03 PM   #261
callas01 callas01 is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
callas01's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
Riverside, CA
42
230
47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
I sent you a PM.
replied
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 02:50 AM   #262
Yeha-Noha Yeha-Noha is offline
Power Member
 
Yeha-Noha's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
When polyfill is added to an enclosure, it changes the behavior of the airflow in the enclosure from "adiabatic" to "isothermal". The term "adiabatic" means that there is no heat transfer occurring. An isothermal process means that as the air passes through the polyfill, the fibers wiggle and cause some of the energy created by the air to be dissipated as heat. This heats the surrounding air molecules warmer, causing the air to become less dense. Sound waves travel easier through a denser medium. As a result, the driver interacts with the enclosure as if it is larger than it actually is.[*]Larger cabinets are more efficient and as a result low frequency extension of the sub will be lowered. It will also lower the resonant frequency of the port..

BD, this is exactly what I was saying. Yes it lowers the fb of the box or the resonant frequency of the port when polyfil is added. The density / cubic ft data clearly shows that is the case in the source that you got the data from.

That's fine. But what the author is overlooking are other effects of doing that. Designing a ported enclosure makes use of Qts and Qes of the driver, Xmax, and voice coil temperature or thermal limits and the desired box volume to keep cost down. Yes you can make the port turning frequency go lower by making the driver 'think' it's in a larger box by adding 0.5 to 1.0 lbs / cu. ft. However, if you don't know the driver parameters, you could end up fighting a three headed dragon.

First you need to know if the driver parameter Xmax is exceeded by trying to go deeper in the bass region. The cone needs to move more air to produce lower and lower bass frequencies. When the cone exceeds Xmax, it will likely bottom out depending on how far it tries to go.

Secondly, will the voil coil exceed it's temperature limits when being supplied with more current to keep up with the demand producing greater EM strenght to move the cone more?

I'm not saying that polyfil shouldn't be added. What I am saying is that the sub designer knows what these critical parameters are and their limits. It is the sub designer who should calculate the amount of polyfil necessary to achieve the optimum tuning frequency: that is to say, how low can I go without bottoming out?

You said earlier that I may be knocking AA when in fact I was praising them for not adding polyfil. It just may well be for their sub's driver parameters they knew exactly how much polyfil should be placed in the enclosure without causing it to bottom out with the lower bass extension. There is no such thing as a free lunch. You may go lower now, but not louder too.

My bone of contention about adding polyfil post production stage is that one ends up going about it blindly if he/she knows nothing about he enclosure and the driver parameters that the enclosure was specially built for. That's what I am saying, and that's why I am not adding polyfill to my PA120, eD, SVS, AA, Polk, Klipsch, Krell reference sub or any other sub I buy unless the manufacturer can tell me how much to add or provide me with the driver's Thiele-Small parameters, so I can calculate how much needs to be added.

Just because after someone opens the subwoofer box and is horrified after seeing a scant amount of damping material in the box doesn't necessarily mean that it needs more. How do you know for sure? All you can do is trial and error and hope for the best. That's not the way I like to do things. You could end up making a big mistake if the designer intended that the amount of damping material was optimum to begin with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 03:41 PM   #263
Yeha-Noha Yeha-Noha is offline
Power Member
 
Yeha-Noha's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
43
Default

PA 120 listening tests:

Subwoofer volume set at level 6. Yamaha V663 subwoofer level +3.0 db.

TDK: Hospital explosion. SPL level read 110 db (RS meter set to slow) seated
  • 14 ft from the PA 120. The sonic impact was tremendous. I could actually feel it inside my body. My old Titanic 1200 sub would have gone into distortion at that level. Highest I could obtained with the Titanic was SPL = 105 db (tested several months ago). I didn't hear any distortion at all. I was really impressed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 01:34 AM   #264
aramis109 aramis109 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
aramis109's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Milwaukee, WI
10
4
360
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
PA 120 listening tests:

Subwoofer volume set at level 6. Yamaha V663 subwoofer level +3.0 db.

TDK: Hospital explosion. SPL level read 110 db (RS meter set to slow) seated
  • 14 ft from the PA 120. The sonic impact was tremendous. I could actually feel it inside my body. My old Titanic 1200 sub would have gone into distortion at that level. Highest I could obtained with the Titanic was SPL = 105 db (tested several months ago). I didn't hear any distortion at all. I was really impressed.
I just watched that last night and tonight (mostly due to my new TV, but also because I was due). I agree- the PA-120 really shines on this flick. The whole film sounds amazing with this sub. According to Audyssey I sit about 13ft from it, but I believe it's more like 11 or 12.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 03:46 AM   #265
Aerodude73 Aerodude73 is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Aerodude73's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
Middletown, RI (MEMBER OF THE "ECPP")™
134
423
2493
7
3
9
31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
PA 120 listening tests:

Subwoofer volume set at level 6. Yamaha V663 subwoofer level +3.0 db.

TDK: Hospital explosion. SPL level read 110 db (RS meter set to slow) seated
  • -
  • 14 ft from the PA 120. The sonic impact was tremendous. I could actually feel it inside my body. My old Titanic 1200 sub would have gone into distortion at that level. Highest I could obtained with the Titanic was SPL = 105 db (tested several months ago). I didn't hear any distortion at all. I was really impressed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aramis109 View Post
I just watched that last night and tonight (mostly due to my new TV, but also because I was due). I agree- the PA-120 really shines on this flick. The whole film sounds amazing with this sub. According to Audyssey I sit about 13ft from it, but I believe it's more like 11 or 12.
Very cool news guys - Hearing things like these makes me Really look forward that much more to when my PA-120 arrives! Btw, I think Audyssey gets things "almost" right more times than it should, or you would expect it to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 05:05 AM   #266
starbuck4488 starbuck4488 is offline
Member
 
starbuck4488's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Northern Virginia
2
Default

Sorry I can't really contribute with any scientific data, but here my thoughts about my pa-120:

I have been very impressed and completely satisfied with my new sub. Coming from an old RCA htib sub, I knew there would be a night and day difference.

I was a little nervous when it arrived with a 2 inch gash/dent in the box. Fortunately, not a scratch was present when I removed the beast from the box. I didn't have much of a choice in it's room location, but it turned out to be a pretty good spot acoustically. Followed the advice of others on this site as to what I should set volume, phase, ect...

Started up Iron Man, and went to the scene when he goes supersonic for the first time. Whoa....I had really been missing a large piece of my (town)home theater experience. The sub shook the walls, anything hanging on the walls, the floor, and anyone on the floor....on all three levels of my townhouse.

If anyone is interested, I can post a few pics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 05:21 AM   #267
Driver_King Driver_King is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Driver_King's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Tampa Bay, Florida
96
28
10
Default

Post them in your HT Gallery!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:28 PM   #268
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
BD, this is exactly what I was saying. Yes it lowers the fb of the box or the resonant frequency of the port when polyfil is added. The density / cubic ft data clearly shows that is the case in the source that you got the data from.

That's fine. But what the author is overlooking are other effects of doing that. Designing a ported enclosure makes use of Qts and Qes of the driver, Xmax, and voice coil temperature or thermal limits and the desired box volume to keep cost down. Yes you can make the port turning frequency go lower by making the driver 'think' it's in a larger box by adding 0.5 to 1.0 lbs / cu. ft. However, if you don't know the driver parameters, you could end up fighting a three headed dragon.

First you need to know if the driver parameter Xmax is exceeded by trying to go deeper in the bass region. The cone needs to move more air to produce lower and lower bass frequencies. When the cone exceeds Xmax, it will likely bottom out depending on how far it tries to go.

Secondly, will the voil coil exceed it's temperature limits when being supplied with more current to keep up with the demand producing greater EM strenght to move the cone more?

I'm not saying that polyfil shouldn't be added. What I am saying is that the sub designer knows what these critical parameters are and their limits. It is the sub designer who should calculate the amount of polyfil necessary to achieve the optimum tuning frequency: that is to say, how low can I go without bottoming out?

You said earlier that I may be knocking AA when in fact I was praising them for not adding polyfil. It just may well be for their sub's driver parameters they knew exactly how much polyfil should be placed in the enclosure without causing it to bottom out with the lower bass extension. There is no such thing as a free lunch. You may go lower now, but not louder too.

My bone of contention about adding polyfil post production stage is that one ends up going about it blindly if he/she knows nothing about he enclosure and the driver parameters that the enclosure was specially built for. That's what I am saying, and that's why I am not adding polyfill to my PA120, eD, SVS, AA, Polk, Klipsch, Krell reference sub or any other sub I buy unless the manufacturer can tell me how much to add or provide me with the driver's Thiele-Small parameters, so I can calculate how much needs to be added.

Just because after someone opens the subwoofer box and is horrified after seeing a scant amount of damping material in the box doesn't necessarily mean that it needs more. How do you know for sure? All you can do is trial and error and hope for the best. That's not the way I like to do things. You could end up making a big mistake if the designer intended that the amount of damping material was optimum to begin with.
Polyfill has three main benefits:
  1. It provides enclosure dampening.
  2. It makes the subwoofer box appear to be larger.
  3. It will lower the tuning frequency of the port and extends the low frequency response of the subwoofer.
I believe your conclusion that polyfill increases the risk of damage to the driver is incorrect. Let me start with an introduction and explain why polyfill will in fact lower the risk of damage to the driver.

In any type of enclosure, the woofer relies, at least partly, on the enclosure for damping. If there is insufficient damping, the woofer’s cone will move significantly more than it should. The ported box will provide virtually no damping below the port frequency (all of the control will be provided by the woofer’s suspension). Below the port tuning frequency, it is possible to cause damage to the woofer well before power levels approach the maximum power ratings of the woofer.

Port tuning is not rocket science. The builder decides what the tuning should be, based on the type of applications (HT, music, or car) that the subwoofer is made for. A subwoofer for car audio is tuned high 35Hz-50Hz because most car audio enthusiasts are SPL junkies. Music subwoofers are tuned in the 25Hz to 35Hz range, and HT subwoofers are tuned below 25Hz. The tuned frequency of the port, usually a length of PVC pipe, depends on the two port parameters of area and length for a given enclosure/woofer combination.

By adding a port, the rear wave of the cone motion is used to reinforce the front wave. This typically results in a system with a higher efficiency (it plays louder with less power). The disadvantages of this design are lower power handling and poor response below the port tuning frequency.

At frequencies above the port tuning frequency, cone excursion will be very well controlled, and will actually be lower than that of a sealed enclosure, but at frequencies below the port tuning, as there is no internal box pressure to control excursion, the driver can easily reach its excursion limit with very little power. This is not a big issue with tuning frequencies down in the 20-25Hz range, because most content do not go that low. However, if the tuning is in the 35-40Hz or higher range, you will have the potential for significant content to be below your tuning. Cone excursion below the tuning frequency in a ported enclosure is very, very high, and can easily cause damage to the driver if it is not controlled. At frequencies below the tuning frequency of the port, a woofer starts to de-couple. This means that the controlling function of the enclosure begins to disappear. The collapse is gradual rather than immediate, but at some point below the tuning of the port, the speaker behaves as if it were operating without an enclosure and suffers from potentially damaging over-excursion. This is why it is a good practice to use an subsonic filter when running a ported enclosure. Some subwoofer amplifiers come with a subsonic filter, which block these lowest frequencies.

What happens if the box is too small?
If the box is too small, the bass will be slightly boomy with strong mid-bass and less low bass. Typically, power-handling is improved if the box is not too small. You can compensate somewhat for a small box volume by adding polyfill to the box. The stuffing can make the box appear up to 40% larger to the driver and will lower the tuned frequency.

A slightly lower tuning frequency will add a little more safety due to the driver not unloading below tuning frequency as soon. Polyfill provides this additional safety.

What happens if the box is too large?
Typically the low frequency extension of the system improves a little, at the expense of power handling. If the ported subwoofer is too large, there will be a response peak around the resonance frequency of the system that can easily be corrected with an equalizer.

Ultimately, people are free to do what they please with their equipment and many people choose to modify their speakers and other electronic equipment. There are also a few upgrade companies around that offer equipment modification and upgrades and a company like Hsu Research was one of the first companies that offered variable port tuning with their VTF subwoofers.

It is important for people to understand that nobody is forcing anybody to add polyfill or do any other modification to their equipment. Furthermore, some modifications may improve the performance significantly and some modifications may not offer that much of a change or perhaps they may deteriorate the performance. That is a chance that all tweakers take.

I recently modified my vintage Polk speakers by upgrading their tweeters with silk dome tweeters and also adding super tweeters to them. I became very pleased with the results. I plan to replace their passive radiators with better quality radiators from another company and will definitely add polyfill to them. Remember that equipment manufacturers are not gods and modifying something is not blasphemy.

Last edited by Big Daddy; 08-23-2009 at 12:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 03:37 PM   #269
Driver_King Driver_King is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Driver_King's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Tampa Bay, Florida
96
28
10
Default

Big Daddy, is there something wrong with your passive radiators? I would not suggest replacing them since the passive radiators will not have much effect on your overall sound quality. As long as they are sealed, you will be fine. If you wanted to make a dramatic increase in sound quality, you could upgrade the crossover parts with Sonicaps and place weather-proofing strips (foam-tape) all around the drivers on the inside of your speakers to reduce any resonancies and unwanted vibrations from the inside of your speakers. Club Polk is a great place to learn about upgrading your Polk speakers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 03:41 PM   #270
aramis109 aramis109 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
aramis109's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Milwaukee, WI
10
4
360
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starbuck4488 View Post
Sorry I can't really contribute with any scientific data, but here my thoughts about my pa-120:

I have been very impressed and completely satisfied with my new sub. Coming from an old RCA htib sub, I knew there would be a night and day difference.

I was a little nervous when it arrived with a 2 inch gash/dent in the box. Fortunately, not a scratch was present when I removed the beast from the box. I didn't have much of a choice in it's room location, but it turned out to be a pretty good spot acoustically. Followed the advice of others on this site as to what I should set volume, phase, ect...

Started up Iron Man, and went to the scene when he goes supersonic for the first time. Whoa....I had really been missing a large piece of my (town)home theater experience. The sub shook the walls, anything hanging on the walls, the floor, and anyone on the floor....on all three levels of my townhouse.

If anyone is interested, I can post a few pics.
Added your name to the list. I would like to see some pics of your setup. Add them to your gallery!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 04:31 PM   #271
LastDitchEffort LastDitchEffort is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2009
Milwaukee WI
10
Default

You can add me to the list of owners, I love love love this sub for the money! Check out gallery for pics of setup.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 05:34 PM   #272
starbuck4488 starbuck4488 is offline
Member
 
starbuck4488's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Northern Virginia
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aramis109 View Post
Added your name to the list. I would like to see some pics of your setup. Add them to your gallery!
Thanks. Gallery updated. I will add more pictures when my setup becomes worthy of display...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 05:48 PM   #273
jaejw1 jaejw1 is offline
Senior Member
 
jaejw1's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
30
4
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
I haven't told her yet, but I'm planning on buying another one to put on the left side of the fireplace. I kept this sub at that position however I really liked the cleaner tighter bass that I was getting from my original preferred location as shown in the pics from my gallery. At the other location, the 20 Hz to 30 Hz range is better but lacking above that range. Thus, two PA 120s should do just nicely complementing each other.
Yes, anyone who has cherry speakers from Energy or Polk should consider this sub for the matching styling and finish.

As far as performance goes, this sub puts my old Dayton Titanic 1200 (DIY)to shame. The bass is just cleaner and tighter. I was shocked. The 12" Titanic went belly up after nearly 9 years of use, thus immediately I was able to make that distinction although I realize it's a subjective one. It isn't even broken in yet. It's amazing.
you are in for a huge surprise..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 11:34 PM   #274
Yeha-Noha Yeha-Noha is offline
Power Member
 
Yeha-Noha's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaejw1 View Post
you are in for a huge surprise..
I'm ready!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 11:38 PM   #275
aramis109 aramis109 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
aramis109's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Milwaukee, WI
10
4
360
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LastDitchEffort View Post
You can add me to the list of owners, I love love love this sub for the money! Check out gallery for pics of setup.
Added ya.

Quote:
Originally Posted by starbuck4488 View Post
Thanks. Gallery updated. I will add more pictures when my setup becomes worthy of display...
Heh, I need to update my pics. Don't worry about being "worthy" ... there's ALWAYS going to be someone with better equipment on here. As long as you have a clean setup people usually like it. Cable management seems the biggest thing. You guys both have really nice setups. Love that in-wall shelf for the components, starbuck!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 07:49 AM   #276
Yeha-Noha Yeha-Noha is offline
Power Member
 
Yeha-Noha's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Polyfill has three main benefits:
  1. It provides enclosure dampening.
  2. It makes the subwoofer box appear to be larger.
  3. It will lower the tuning frequency of the port and extends the low frequency response of the subwoofer.
I believe your conclusion that polyfill increases the risk of damage to the driver is incorrect. Let me start with an introduction and explain why polyfill will in fact lower the risk of damage to the driver.

In any type of enclosure, the woofer relies, at least partly, on the enclosure for damping. If there is insufficient damping, the woofer’s cone will move significantly more than it should. The ported box will provide virtually no damping below the port frequency (all of the control will be provided by the woofer’s suspension). Below the port tuning frequency, it is possible to cause damage to the woofer well before power levels approach the maximum power ratings of the woofer.

Port tuning is not rocket science. The builder decides what the tuning should be, based on the type of applications (HT, music, or car) that the subwoofer is made for. A subwoofer for car audio is tuned high 35Hz-50Hz because most car audio enthusiasts are SPL junkies. Music subwoofers are tuned in the 25Hz to 35Hz range, and HT subwoofers are tuned below 25Hz. The tuned frequency of the port, usually a length of PVC pipe, depends on the two port parameters of area and length for a given enclosure/woofer combination.

By adding a port, the rear wave of the cone motion is used to reinforce the front wave. This typically results in a system with a higher efficiency (it plays louder with less power). The disadvantages of this design are lower power handling and poor response below the port tuning frequency.

At frequencies above the port tuning frequency, cone excursion will be very well controlled, and will actually be lower than that of a sealed enclosure, but at frequencies below the port tuning, as there is no internal box pressure to control excursion, the driver can easily reach its excursion limit with very little power. This is not a big issue with tuning frequencies down in the 20-25Hz range, because most content do not go that low. However, if the tuning is in the 35-40Hz or higher range, you will have the potential for significant content to be below your tuning. Cone excursion below the tuning frequency in a ported enclosure is very, very high, and can easily cause damage to the driver if it is not controlled. At frequencies below the tuning frequency of the port, a woofer starts to de-couple. This means that the controlling function of the enclosure begins to disappear. The collapse is gradual rather than immediate, but at some point below the tuning of the port, the speaker behaves as if it were operating without an enclosure and suffers from potentially damaging over-excursion. This is why it is a good practice to use an subsonic filter when running a ported enclosure. Some subwoofer amplifiers come with a subsonic filter, which block these lowest frequencies.

What happens if the box is too small?
If the box is too small, the bass will be slightly boomy with strong mid-bass and less low bass. Typically, power-handling is improved if the box is not too small. You can compensate somewhat for a small box volume by adding polyfill to the box. The stuffing can make the box appear up to 40% larger to the driver and will lower the tuned frequency.

A slightly lower tuning frequency will add a little more safety due to the driver not unloading below tuning frequency as soon. Polyfill provides this additional safety.

What happens if the box is too large?
Typically the low frequency extension of the system improves a little, at the expense of power handling. If the ported subwoofer is too large, there will be a response peak around the resonance frequency of the system that can easily be corrected with an equalizer.

Ultimately, people are free to do what they please with their equipment and many people choose to modify their speakers and other electronic equipment. There are also a few upgrade companies around that offer equipment modification and upgrades and a company like Hsu Research was one of the first companies that offered variable port tuning with their VTF subwoofers.

It is important for people to understand that nobody is forcing anybody to add polyfill or do any other modification to their equipment. Furthermore, some modifications may improve the performance significantly and some modifications may not offer that much of a change or perhaps they may deteriorate the performance. That is a chance that all tweakers take.

I recently modified my vintage Polk speakers by upgrading their tweeters with silk dome tweeters and also adding super tweeters to them. I became very pleased with the results. I plan to replace their passive radiators with better quality radiators from another company and will definitely add polyfill to them. Remember that equipment manufacturers are not gods and modifying something is not blasphemy.
BD, very nice discussion. I really benefited from it and enjoyed it.

Some subwoofer builders may design their subs to be smaller than optimum for a variety of reasons. In that case adding polyfill to increase the enclosure volume was part of the design. And that design was for a specific driver that would work in such a box. I have no problem with that.

In closing, all I meant to say was that a properly designed ported speaker that is designed for a certain driver shouldn't need pollyfill to make it better. Whether you believe it or not, ported speaker design is more of a rocket science than you think. Ever since Thiele and Small published their findings on speaker design, it has been a science. One can predict the outcome of putting a specific driver in a specific box built around that drivers Thiele - Small parameters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:46 AM   #277
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
BD, very nice discussion. I really benefited from it and enjoyed it.

Some subwoofer builders may design their subs to be smaller than optimum for a variety of reasons. In that case adding polyfill to increase the enclosure volume was part of the design. And that design was for a specific driver that would work in such a box. I have no problem with that.

In closing, all I meant to say was that a properly designed ported speaker that is designed for a certain driver shouldn't need pollyfill to make it better. Whether you believe it or not, ported speaker design is more of a rocket science than you think. Ever since Thiele and Small published their findings on speaker design, it has been a science. One can predict the outcome of putting a specific driver in a specific box built around that drivers Thiele - Small parameters.
Don't you realize that I know about Thiele & Small parameters and do not need to be reminded of them in every post? It is my nature to write in a simplified language and avoid such things as T/S parameters so that an average person who is not well-versed in the art of subwoofer design can understand it easily.

I doubt it very much that subwoofer design is Rocket Science. At least, not the kind of science I learned in Engineering school.

The T/S parameters along with all other speaker specifications such as impedance or frequency response are at best a rough approximation. I hope NASA doesn't do its calculations the way manufacturers publish these numbers and design their subwoofers. Otherwise, if they were shooting for the Moon, they would end up in Mars.

Last edited by Big Daddy; 08-24-2009 at 11:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 07:26 PM   #278
Yeha-Noha Yeha-Noha is offline
Power Member
 
Yeha-Noha's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Don't you realize that I know about Thiele & Small parameters and do not need to be reminded of them in every post? It is my nature to write in a simplified language and avoid such things as T/S parameters so that an average person who is not well-versed in the art of subwoofer design can understand it easily.

I doubt it very much that subwoofer design is Rocket Science. At least, not the kind of science I learned in Engineering school.

The T/S parameters along with all other speaker specifications such as impedance or frequency response are at best a rough approximation. I hope NASA doesn't do its calculations the way manufacturers publish these numbers and design their subwoofers. Otherwise, if they were shooting for the Moon, they would end up in Mars.
I do agree with you on that one. However, I was using the term rocket science more in the nature of predicting the performance of a subwoofer using the T/S parameters.

However speaking of real rocket science in the space industry, I doubt NASA could send men back to the moon even within the next decade let alone put men/women on Mars by 2030. Maybe, but an awful big maybe. Their rocket science isn't what it used to be like during NASA's golden age (Apollo Space program). But it's still good rocket science I suppose, but not great like saying, Are we there yet?

However, rocket science or not, I still trust the T/S parameters as applied to speaker design. It doesn't need to be NASA rocket science. That's for sure. They haven't let me down yet though.

Last edited by Big Daddy; 08-24-2009 at 11:17 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:15 PM   #279
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwojtalewicz View Post
I do agree with you on that one. However, I was using the term rocket science more in the nature of predicting the performance of a subwoofer using the T/S parameters.

However speaking of real rocket science in the space industry, I doubt NASA could send men back to the moon even within the next decade let alone put men/women on Mars by 2030. Maybe, but an awful big maybe. Their rocket science isn't what it used to be like during NASA's golden age (Apollo Space program). But it's still good rocket science I suppose, but not great like saying, Are we there yet?

However, rocket science or not, I still trust the T/S parameters as applied to speaker design. It doesn't need to be NASA rocket science. That's for sure. They haven't let me down yet though.
Many people don't realize that we put a man on the moon in 1969. I doubt it very much they can successfully do that in 2009.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:28 PM   #280
StimpsonJCat StimpsonJCat is offline
Expert Member
 
StimpsonJCat's Avatar
 
Apr 2009
Texas
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Many people don't realize that we put a man on the moon in 1969. I doubt it very much they can successfully do that in 2009.
Don't they still have warehouse where they filmed all the moon landings? And with the advances in CGI it should be easy to....









-jk (I'm actually a space science nut....or was when I was a kid).
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Subwoofers

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
The Official Totem Acoustics Speakers Thread Speakers Big Daddy 1342 06-28-2023 04:27 PM
The Official Ascend Acoustics Speakers Thread Speakers blindcat87 81 05-15-2018 09:53 PM
The Official Boston Acoustics Speakers Thread Speakers Big Daddy 177 05-14-2014 01:40 PM
The Official Premier Acoustic Speakers Thread Speakers cklim55 27 09-18-2011 02:13 AM
Official Snell Acoustics Speakers Thread Speakers prerich 8 08-31-2009 12:28 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 AM.