|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $14.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $54.45 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $80.68 |
![]() |
#35641 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Mad Max: Fury Road 4.5/5
Wowza this film was 120 minutes of non-stop octane adrenal ...and I loved every second of it ![]() ![]() ![]() The character development was excellent. Theron's character went through a convincing struggle and her relationship with Max had incredible scope. Overall just great. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Al_The_Strange (06-06-2016), Foggy (06-06-2016), KilloWertz (06-07-2016), Lepidopterous (06-07-2016) |
![]() |
#35642 | ||
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
Thanks given by: | surfdude12 (06-06-2016) |
![]() |
#35643 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Al_The_Strange (06-06-2016), surfdude12 (06-06-2016) |
![]() |
#35644 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Love & Friendship 2/5
Not sure why this got such rave critic acclaim. Unlike most Jane Austen films, the "romance" (if you call it that) is more cut-throat and selfish than warm and genuine. Nothing wrong with that, except I can't root for a protagonist who selfishly manipulates people [Show spoiler] . Even the worst movie villains in film history weren't that lucky ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35646 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
The Babadook 5/5
Wow, this film was amazing. Reminded me a lot of The Shining. Especially the constant reference to Big Bad Wolf and 3 little pigs tale (Jack: little pigs, little pigs, please let me in...then I'll huff and I'll puff ![]() Overall, the best and most powerful aspect of the film (like The Shining) is the theme of how we create our own inner hell/monsters in our heads, and we feed this monster the more we deny its existence. [Show spoiler]
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Al_The_Strange (06-06-2016), Lepidopterous (06-07-2016) |
![]() |
#35647 | ||
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
Thanks given by: | surfdude12 (06-06-2016) |
![]() |
#35648 | ||
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Knackered...holy cow haven't heard that in years. ![]() Quote:
[Show spoiler] and CONVINCINGLY!!!! ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#35649 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35650 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
LOL
I knew it RIGHT when I heard it. Here's another hint: its an opening score sequence of one of your favorite films where they're introducing the characters.... ![]() (I just looked and its in your top 20, for some reason I thought it was your #1, or #2, but its still in top 20) ok here is the answer LOL [Show spoiler]
Last edited by surfdude12; 06-06-2016 at 04:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35651 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
I also liked that the ending was more about [Show spoiler] I recommend checking out It Follows, which was the rave horror film from last year. I don't think you'll particularly care for it's aesthetic, and it doesn't quite share the ambiguity as The Babadook, but it taps into quite a few of the existential fears that The Babadook does. ![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | surfdude12 (06-06-2016) |
![]() |
#35652 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
[Show spoiler]
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35653 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Great insight into the film. The Witch is another film that deals with the theme of fear exceptionally well. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | surfdude12 (06-07-2016) |
![]() |
#35654 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | surfdude12 (06-07-2016) |
![]() |
#35655 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Haven't really found the time or motivation to do full-blown reviews on my latest viewings. So, here's a bunch of rambling summaries:
Captain America: Civil War: Yeah, sure, it's okay, why not? As most reviews point out, the movie wastes little time on a setup, because it's already there from every other Marvel movie before it. This film promises an emotional climax for the Steve Rodgers / Winter Soldier / Iron Man conflict, which results in a massive 12-hero fight in an airport that's just plain nuts. As cool as it all is, I found myself caring shockingly little for the emotional stakes. If anything, I found myself sympathizing with Tony Stark more (even though I agree more with Rodger's stance on the political issues), and less about Cap / WS, which is what we should probably care about the most. On top of that, there are plot holes and some subplots that have little to do with Cap America (seriously, how long was [Show spoiler] ?). On the plus side, the debate at the core of the film is interesting, and carries a lot of the same thematic density that Batman vs Superman had.3.5/5 (best recommended to Marvel fans) -------------------- X-Men: Days of Future Past: Always did love it. It might have one or two plot holes and a lot going on, but I admire the film a lot for its double-barrelled narrative wrapped around a Terminator-style plot. Conflicts are tense, action is great, but what I love the most are the characters. So many familiar faces pick up the strands where previous films left off (even finding some dramatic gold from the series' crappiest moments), and they run with them to weave a phenomenal web of clashes. This makes it a very cathartic experience, almost to the point of operatic melodrama (seriously, [Show spoiler] ). What makes this really sweet are the superb performances, and a high-quality production with plenty of attention to detail. I still believe this is the most mature X-Men film of the lot, in terms of quality, style, and storytelling. After this viewing, I've determined that yes, this is my favorite (supplanting X2, my former favorite, which now seems so cartoony by comparison).Watched the Rogue Cut this time. Biggest alteration is a subplot in which Rogue is extracted to step in for Kitty--pretty neat touch, but hardly necessary. 5/5 (recommended) -------------------- X-Men: Apocalypse: I've wanted to see all of this come to a head with Apocalypse ever since 2000, when the very first movie came out. I knew it had to come (curse you, The Last Stand...the more X-Men I see, the more I hate thee). Following DOFP, it's finally come--an epic showdown between the world's most powerful mutant and the titular X-Men. There is tons of carnage to behold, yes. What makes this bearable is that all the same qualities of DOFP manage to carry over--maybe not as much, but characters are still relevant and still feel fresh. While DOFP dealt a lot with Charles Xavier overcoming his low point, this one shows Magneto's high point in life, which is torn down in a gut-wrenching tragedy. Other characters show apt development as well, and they all contribute to a complex final act that includes several heroes fighting over a ruined Earth, and Xavier fighting Apocalypse all Inception-style. Despite a few contrivances (seriously, as cool as Quicksilver's slow-mo scene is in this one, it's utterly ridiculous) and continued difficulty connecting strands from all the movies (like, all those last shots in DOFP suddenly don't mean much anymore), I see lots to love in this movie. 4/5 (recommended the most to franchise fans, I'm sure others will bash it) |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Diesel (06-08-2016) |
![]() |
#35656 | |
Banned
|
![]() Regression is a film that proves that Emma Watson really is a bad actress and has much to improve. She never convinces as the girl who is supposedly abused by her dad and a satanic cult. She has to cry a lot in this movie and it's cringe-worthy. Ethan Hawke is good as usual, although he does overact a bit in the second half. David Thewlis gets very little to work with as the psychoanalyst who uses regression therapy on the victims and perps and is ultimately wasted. Alejandro Amenábar is a good director but he's not showing much of his skills here. It sometimes has the look and feel of a movie made for tv. The story can't decide what it wants to be. Someone who watches movies like this on a regular basis will also see the twist (of course there is one) coming from a mile away, because everything is so obvious. Not recommended. 5/10 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35657 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35658 | |
Banned
|
![]() The Darkness is not a good horror movie. It's basically a rip-off from every haunted house movie that exists: from Amityville to The Conjuring, from Poltergeist to The Haunting. This time a family is haunted by some evil supernatural native american spirits because an annoying autistic kid took their precious stones from their not-so-hidden cave. The first hour nothing remotely interesting happens. For some reason ghosts always like to prank people by moving things or let lights blink, before they get to the real hardcore stuff. Anyway, it's more of a family drama with some spooky things interjected into the story. Kevin Bacon looks seriously bored, Radha Mitchell was surprisingly okay and the kids are annoying like in every other generic horror movie of this kind. There was one moment that you could call tense and somewhat exciting, but everything else is just bad, bad filmmaking. It's kinda hard to believe this piece of crap comes from the same guy who directed Wolf Creek. 4.5/10 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35659 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Good time as any to start getting psyched for Star Trek: Beyond...
Star Trek: The Motion Picture "Each of us... at some time in our lives, turns to someone - a father, a brother, a God... and asks...'Why am I here? What was I meant to be?'" - Leonard Nimoy -------------------- It took a good ten years to adapt Star Trek, one of the best and most famous sci-fi TV shows of all time, for the big screen. When they finally did, Star Trek: The Motion Picture premiered to showcase a big, bold, extravagant spectacle, and a story that promised to be the end-all be-all Trek adventure. The problem is, watching this film has always been a weird experience. Despite the gorgeous model work and special effects, there really isn't much action to this, and the pacing overall is rather slow. Even at its smartest, the Star Trek series and all its future incarnations always had an adventurous spirit embedded with its stories--this movie strips away the adventure in favor of a strict and somewhat cold piece of hard sci-fi. There's little warmth, and certainly no real bang, to this picture. That being said, it still has its merits. The interstellar odyssey through the V'Ger cloud could be seen as something wondrous and awe-inspiring. The biggest draw to this film will be its story, which showcases a very clever high-concept premise with strong overarching philosophical themes of existence, purpose, and the human spirit. The plot holding these concepts up is a pretty standard affair, but is stretched rather thinly due to a number of lengthy scenes that could have easily been cut from the film. A lot of screen time is devoted to endless beauty shots of the Enterprise, there's a weird and silly scene where everybody's trapped in a wormhole for some odd reason, and there's a seemingly-pointless scene involving a transporter accident. What really throws me off, however, are the characters. The original cast is all here--Captain Kirk, Commander Spock, Dr. McCoy, Uhura, Chekov, Sulu, Scotty--but Spock is the only one of the lot who actually feels like a main character. In this movie, it's Decker and Ilia who take the center stage, and they go through a romantic spiel that borders on being sappy. Photography and editing are generally good in this film. Acting is disappointingly dry from the classic Trek crew, possibly because they're not given much to do as they are in the sequels. Leonard Nimoy is easily the biggest standout here--William Shatner does the best he can to make Captain Kirk cool again, but comes off as a little grouchy. DeForest Kelley throws out some occasionally crass and witty lines. As the true main character, Stephen Collins comes off as rather dull. Persis Khambatta might be the best and most interesting performance here. Writing is not bad, especially regarding the high-brow aspects of the film, but it lacks a certain personality overall. This production has some rather gaudy costumes, but most sets, props, and special effects are great. Music is great too. In the same fashion as 2001: A Space Odyssey, I have to really be in the right mood to watch this film. Both 2001 and Star Trek: The Motion Picture are space operas with very big special effects and very big ideas, but aren't that big on character building. As a Trek film, this first feature can be a rather dry and bewildering experience, especially if you're looking to see the original Enterprise crew in action. As a piece of intelligent sci-fi, with a pair of entirely strange new characters in the lead, it can be an interesting and rewarding experience. Especially for the Director's Cut of this film, which is a little more evenly-paced, and features some smashing new special effects. It's worth a look for interested sci-fi fans and most Star Trek fans. 3.5/5 -------------------- On Blu-Ray, this movie looks really smashing at times. Most space scenes and models look better than ever. However, some slight DNR and EE rear their ugly heads, making some of the indoor shots appear soft or fuzzed-out. Some noise can be seen here and there. Sound quality shows its age, but is pretty decent. PQ: 3.5/5, AQ: 3.5/5 |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Diesel (06-13-2016) |
![]() |
#35660 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
"Do you know the Klingon proverb that tells us revenge is a dish that is best served cold? It is very cold...in space!"—Ricardo Montalbán --------------------- Star Trek: The Motion Picture had its fair share of ambition, but was a lumbering beast of a film that proved bewildering and somewhat dull. In their wisdom, the filmmakers realized that they needed to spice things up for the inevitable sequel, even at the expense of kicking Gene Roddenberry—the revered creator of the franchise—to the curb. Thus, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan came into fruition. Coming after the classic Trek episode Space Seed, this film brings back Khan Noonien Singh as the story's nemesis, and the whole thing becomes a rocketing thrill ride from then on. Space battles are fairly simple and short, but they are still quite spectacular to watch, especially with the colorful backgrounds of the Mutara Nebula. The pacing is pretty even throughout, and the film boasts some remarkable iconic moments that all audiences can recognize and relate to. The story is appealing—even though there is plenty of action and peril in the movie, it has enough breathing space for quality characterization and theme development. A good chunk of the film focuses on Kirk contemplating his old age and mortality. Thanks to the parallels of the Genesis torpedo and the film's ultimate solution, strong themes of death and rebirth emerge very subtly. Even without such elements, the characters come off as being well-rounded and enjoyable. The story covers some fascinating concepts, and is well-structured. This film is shot and edited with quality precision. Acting is phenomenal: while it is always a joy to see William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, DeForest Kelley, and the rest of the crew in action, Ricardo Montalbán steals the show as the villain, with a powerful and iconic performance. Writing is great, featuring plenty of great memorable lines. The production has a fine array of solid sets, props, costumes, and special effects (costumes in particular are much improved from the last Trek picture). Music, despite deviating from the classic Trek themes, has a catchy melodic charm of its own, and it is phenomenal. Of this film, I can say this. Of all the Trek films I have known, this still the most...endearing. A Director's Cut of this film is available, containing some new dialogue. Its very short ad subtle changes, but they add a little more oomph to the characters and themes. 4.5/5 -------------------- The original theatrical cut of this looks/sounds fine as it is on Blu-Ray. The newly-released 4K remastered Director's Cut looks just slightly more natural, with a fully-intact grain structure. Most of the film looks sharp and clean, with the model-work and sets looking the best they can. Some shots of the actors still appear soft, but I suspect they may be source limitations (cameras out of focus or something). The transfer overall looks a tad dark and gray in nature. Sound quality is pretty clean and dynamic, which is excellent considering the movie's age. Overall, the DC Blu-Ray is a good buy for fans. It is worth noting that there are one or two bizarre errors in the film itself (namely, in the opening scene Sulu speaks without turning his head...WTF? I personally didn't spot anything else that I'd consider a deal-breaker). PQ: 4.5/5, AQ: 4.5/5 |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Diesel (06-13-2016), surfdude12 (06-14-2016) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
What movie have you watched the most ??? | Movies | BLUE MYSTIC RAIN | 822 | 02-04-2023 01:21 PM |
The Most Boring Movie You Ever Watched | Movies | Blu Man | 3990 | 10-11-2022 10:18 AM |
What Blu-ray Are You Watching Or Just Watched? Give a Mini Review | Blu-ray Movies - North America | slick1ru2 | 30 | 01-24-2010 07:09 PM |
Official Rate The Last Movie You've Seen Thread | Movies | _Bolt_ | 10 | 11-29-2008 03:28 AM |
User Review Rate Down Trolls | Feedback Forum | Grant Matrix | 1 | 10-30-2008 04:34 PM |
|
|