|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.02 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $23.79 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.96 |
![]() |
#21 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
re: REDS, I guess it is possible that it is technically OOP even if Amazon still has a bunch in stock.
But that just raises the question: does the OOP status mean something different to different folks? I suppose technically when a title is no longer being produced, it may qualify as OOP even if most of the online stores (and maybe even B&M stores) still have enough for a while. For most people, I think OOP means that they are probably not going to find it anywhere, unless it's an incredibly obscure store or through an eBay reseller or an Amazon 3rd-party reseller. Criterion has been kind enough to give us a heads-up when one of their titles is going OOP, and as a result, if you're fast enough you may still be able to get one from Amazon before they run out of stock, which may happen within days of the Criterion announcement. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I mean amazon still has the Criterion dvd "The Small Back Room" in stock and it has been OOP for a while now.
nobody cares about paying $35 for it. simple as that. It is still OOP. the meaning of OOP hasn't changed; it means what it always has--the original studio/company/distributor is not making the product anymore for whatever the reason is. the product has been deleted. whether a store still has any copies has nothing to do with whether or not a cd, dvd, or bd is OOP or not. the end. EDIT: as far as the slipcover rarity game, that is a whole separate thing imo. the OP simply asked about rarest blu-rays. a rare first press bd with a sleeve could certainly be considered a rare bd--like Akira--but imo that's a little different than say Dracula with a sleeve because the sleeve is the only unique thing about the Dracula bd. the Akira piece had a booklet as well as the slipbox that is not present in the subsequent pressings. I mean is the Dracula bd WITH a slipsleeve a super rare bd?--sure. but just Dracula by itself is obviously not. these types of questions always come up when someone asks about rare bds. edit: well the Robocop disc may be rare but it is worthless because it looks like total crap. IF a rare bd market really develops in the coming years, imo the Led Zeppelin bd will be right there at the front because it was a released bd that got recalled and has an error on it. the Robocop was never officially released from my understanding so that's a big difference. I honestly don't ever see that Robocop being worth anything more than $15. is it technically a rare bd?--I guess. sure. Last edited by Arkadin; 12-25-2010 at 09:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
All I am saying that there are slipcovers like the Gold Paramount titles or the Harold and Kumar Comic-Con slips that are fairly impossible to buy. I've personally offered $500 to anyone that can get me a mint/near mint Comic-Con Harold and Kumar with the NPH slipcover and no one has it. ![]() Now you want to talk about rare 'discs'? How about the Alien discs Weaver got over a year early via Fox, or some of the demo discs/studio screeners that rarely see the light of day. Those are what I'd consider RARE. As a rule of thumb, I find that most Anime films tend to be the most expensive to track down after a while. They usually have a higher MSRP during release and they skyrocket even more after going OOP. Many of them are never rereleased and what is printed is usually done so in lower quantities. Importing Anime films can also be a super expensive hobby when a single title is $79+. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I totally agree that the anime stuff will likely command some of the highest prices when all is said and done for sure, as a lot of those bds are already expensive and rare to start with.
no doubt about that. ![]() It will be interesting to see if enough film bds are even issued for a true rarity/collectable market to even develop over the next few years beyond a very limited number of pieces like steelbooks and/or super limited collector sets. hard to say. Last edited by Arkadin; 12-25-2010 at 10:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Now I don't know if any stores actually sold copies of it. Did they just print up review screeners, mass produce it and later destroy them, or did they ship to retailers and recall it? Might be a good question for one of the Sony insiders to answer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Because the MGM/Fox version isn't much to be proud of either! It's a question of which transfer is closer to the original print. The Criterion dvd isn't that great either IMO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
my understanding is that the "early" Robocop looks bad, like in defectively bad, with massive artifacts and all kinds of compression and other digital noise issues, etc. etc.
the mgm Robocop, while poor, is nothing like that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I agree, I always consider Criterion a company that prides themselves on excellent looking transfers, and their dvd is merely OK. With the MGM BD looking terrible as well...makes me want to lean in the direction of saying that there may not be a nice quality print readily available to use for mastering.
![]() I do like thet fact that Criterion does give us a warning when something is going OOP. I bought the Third man, and Pierrot le fou dirctly from amazon when I found out about them. My copy of Third man is in the plastic case too...now I wish I wouldn't have opened it. ![]() What surprises me is that Studio Canal released Third Man on bd, and it appearantly has a really nice transfer, so I wonder how the Criterion release just keeps going up. It really hasn't even been OOP for THAT long. Must be just because it is Criterion. ![]() ![]() Do you guys think the case makes the big difference? The digipack vs. the plastic? ![]() Some of you must have some "connections" to have/know about releases that didn't even surface! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by painted_klown; 12-25-2010 at 11:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Special Member
|
![]()
If anyone is interested, here's some screenshot comparisons of the Sony and Fox/MGM Robocop blu-rays: Link
Very interesting stuff. While the Sony version has EE and boosted contrast, the Fox version has heavy DNR. So it's kind of a Catch 22. If anyone has a Sony Robocop blu-ray that they would like to sell/trade, I'm definitely interested. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Can't believe you had to pay an arm and a leg for the Indy 4 Photo Book BD. This little preowned shop in my town had atleast 6 unopened for $12 last week. Thought about picking one up, but the movie is just too bad to waste my money.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Special Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|