As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
11 hrs ago
Wallace & Gromit: The Complete Cracking Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$13.99
6 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.52
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
A History of Violence 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2008, 03:16 PM   #21
mystiksuicide mystiksuicide is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
mystiksuicide's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Miami
305
27
Default

I can just see the last 10 remaining dud'ers watching us pick up Warner blu-titles knowing they're days are numbered.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:24 PM   #22
Sonny Sonny is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
8
6
1
Default

I dont think WB should put out any more new releases on HDDVD or even more movies that are already on the shelf , there are plenty on shelves & ware houses why make any more??? & SCREW this BULL about filling Contracts
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:26 PM   #23
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

If roles were reversed and Blu ray was on the verge of collapse I'll tell ya one thing......there is no way in hell I'd be buying Warner titles and/or Paramount/Universal titles knowing the end was near. I'd be forced to get an HD DVD player, unfortunately.

Hardcore HD DVD fans just have to accept defeat so HDM has a chance to thrive. Universal/Paramount need to give up HD DVD now rather than later.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:29 PM   #24
spam.curitiba spam.curitiba is offline
Expert Member
 
spam.curitiba's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
172
2
Default

What is going to be interesting is how many hd-dvd versions of twister they make since it is coming out may 5th. I bet this will be a hard to find for anyone still buying hd dvd's
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:32 PM   #25
MrXpress MrXpress is offline
Member
 
Oct 2007
Tampa, FL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny View Post
I dont think WB should put out any more new releases on HDDVD or even more movies that are already on the shelf , there are plenty on shelves & ware houses why make any more??? & SCREW this BULL about filling Contracts
Agreed. The average customer who may have an interest in HDM but doesn't keep up with the news and everything (i.e., wouldn't necessarily be of the knowledge that WB is now Blu-ray exclusive and that Blu-ray is winning) is still going to see two high-def formats in the aisle at the local Best Buy, and will still have that degree of confusion that existed 6 months ago... which obviously isn't exactly the right way to try and gain mainstream acceptance. Hopefully it gets to the point soon where the typical customer walks into a store, goes to the movie aisle and sees "High Definition movies," and nothing but Blu-rays displayed there. Maybe have a small HD DVD section elsewhere in the store, but where most people look it should definitely be entirely Blu-ray, or else like I said, the confusion will still be there and the customer will likely skip right on by it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:32 PM   #26
Tok Tok is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Oct 2007
973
1781
1
5
Default

June 1 can't come fast enough. Just think WHV encodes that are hopefully maximized for BD. It will be interesting to see if they still continue to use MSFT's VC1 or if they switch over to AVC.

I vote for switching just to give MSFT the big ol' finger after MSFT was intentionally trying to confuse the consumers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:34 PM   #27
bkbluray bkbluray is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
bkbluray's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
MN
57
185
25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueNeon View Post
A three window between releasing in Blu-ray the HD DVD is great news. First most people go in the stores to buy the movies the week of release. Everyone wants to see a movie in the first week it is available (either purchase or rent).Customers will always see the Blu-ray version and not the HD dVD version. Any neutral buyer will purchase the blu-ray version. By the time the actual HD DVD version is released 99% of the public would have either purchased it on Blu-ray, DVD, or rented it from Blockbuster.
+1 This is great news for Blu-ray. I agree, if I'm going to buy a $30 movie, I'm going to buy it on week one or day one. If I wait, the title "loses its luster" so to speak. It's just more fun having a movie right when it comes out.

This will impact HD-DVD sales. How much, who knows? But we know they won't be winning any weeks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:35 PM   #28
Icemage Icemage is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grubert View Post
Some confirmation here.

With this move, HD DVD effectively loses two-thirds of its Q1 day-and-date slate (Warner has a strong lineup for the next few months).
Your comment piqued my curiosity about something I've been wondering for a while.

I took the previously released list at HighDefDigest for HD DVD:
http://hddvd.highdefdigest.com/relea...istorical.html

...dropped it into a spreadsheet and wrote some code to analyze the totals.

There are 400 total unique titles on the HighDefDigest list, not counting re-issued discs, and of those, 108 are Warner titles.

So not only does HD DVD lose a lot of upcoming day-and-date power, but it also loses over 25% of its total title catalog (and the proportion of sales represented by the Warner catalog is even larger than that - I would wager Warner's overall HD DVD disc share since inception is probably closer to 40%).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:41 PM   #29
Grubert Grubert is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Grubert's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
573
2
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icemage View Post
So not only does HD DVD lose a lot of upcoming day-and-date power, but it also loses over 25% of its total title catalog (and the proportion of sales represented by the Warner catalog is even larger than that - I would wager Warner's overall HD DVD disc share since inception is probably closer to 40%).
If not more. It was 47.0% in sales since inception through March 18, 2007. It can have dropped a little since (Transformers and all), but not much (300 and Planet Earth).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:44 PM   #30
Esox50 Esox50 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jan 2007
416
488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigW View Post
I vote for switching just to give MSFT the big ol' finger after MSFT was intentionally trying to confuse the consumers.
I think it was posted by a WB employee on another forum that WB plans to stick with Vc-1.

I personally have no problem with this, as long as WB doesn't have to encode for HD DVD and port to Blu-Ray. I suspect the practice of DNR'ing the film transfer to be able to encode at a lower bit-rate for HD DVD will die soon.

We should get Non-DNR'd transfers at BD spec VC-1 bitrates. I expect nothing less from WB going forward (once the pipeline is cleared of movies already encoded for HD DVD).

I suspect by this time next year, we'll be regarding WB's Blu-Rays to be in the same league as those of Sony and Disney. VC-1 or no VC-1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 04:28 PM   #31
BluOgre BluOgre is offline
Senior Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by w_tanoto View Post
it should be given 1 month gap.... IMO

I am legend should be released at the very end of may, meaning it won't go to HD DVD
It doesn't matter, if the street date is in May (which makes sense) then they will be forced to release it on HD-DVD (even if limited in qtys). The contract will force them to at least release it after Blu-ray's version IF it does release in May.

Here is what will be instresting.....how many qtys will they actually make? I mean that's a title that would sell 50-80k easily on HD-DVD (before the announcement of Warner) but it would be funny to see the total qty released to retail is 5-10k lol. Remember, by the time I Am Legend releases in April/May major retailers will not even have an HD-DVD section....or there is also a very good chance Toshiba throws in the towel before that so they won't even have to make an HD-DVD version.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 06:00 PM   #32
jason_grumpy jason_grumpy is offline
Senior Member
 
jason_grumpy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigW View Post
June 1 can't come fast enough. Just think WHV encodes that are hopefully maximized for BD. It will be interesting to see if they still continue to use MSFT's VC1 or if they switch over to AVC.

I vote for switching just to give MSFT the big ol' finger after MSFT was intentionally trying to confuse the consumers.
I wouldn't hold your breath for WB to also switch exclusively to using just AVC. The issue really never was with codecs (mind you, mpeg2 is legacy), but with the bitrate associated with said codec. A secondary consideration is that VC-1 seems to filter the film, but can be disabled and seems to have been employed because of HD-DVD bitrate limitations.

VC-1 can look very good when given enough breathing room. Deja Vu looked fantastic on Blu, with peaks all the way up to the 40's. The issue a lot of us had with Warner's decision to use VC-1 was the low bitrate encodes optimized for HD-DVD. Many people independent of Microsoft claim that the sweetspot for AVC and VC-1 is 20-25mbps and at this point they do look pretty identical, with AVC slightly better.

Besides according to a certain MS employee over on another forum, it's not the use of VC-1 that gains royalties per encode, but instead that the hardware players gain them royalties for the ability to decode it. So unless Blu-Ray drops VC-1 decoding from stand alones, the royalties for the ability to use it will continue to go to MS with stand alone sales. It's unfortunate, but Microsoft hedged their bets and did win that battle before the format war really went into consumers hands.

I think it'll pretty much break down like this with which codec is used:
Disney, Paramount, LionsGate, Sony - AVC
Fox - AVC/MPEG2
Warner, New Line, Universal - VC-1

We might see the occasonal AVC or VC-1 encode from any number of these studios but thats it. AVC, VC-1, or MPEG2 have their strengths and weaknesses, and I'd prefer the film looks the best it can -- regardless of codec.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 06:01 PM   #33
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

The Neilsens are really going to start showing blowouts for Blu very soon at this rate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 06:39 PM   #34
BluOgre BluOgre is offline
Senior Member
 
Aug 2007
Default Warner already reducing the prices of HD-DVD....

I just got a priceprotection sheet from my distributor for Warner titles and there are HD-DVD titles reducing in price. It seems Warner is dropping titles from $34.99 to $27.99 SRP.

Probably not the first wave of cuts for HD-DVD but I did find it funny that the Blu-ray version of those titles were not reduced (like Happy Feet, Departed, Fountain, ect...).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:03 PM   #35
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

Evidently, Toshiba is dropping hardware prices again too.

The HD DVD liquidation sale begins!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:07 PM   #36
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

Time to clean out the garage.... they got to get rid of all those to make room for the new Blu-ray discs they are going to be getting in.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:08 PM   #37
Joon Joon is offline
Expert Member
 
Joon's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
208
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptGreedle View Post
Time to clean out the garage.... they got to get rid of all those to make room for the new Blu-ray discs they are going to be getting in.
LMAO!!! Time to clean out the garbage....That is great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:14 PM   #38
Icemage Icemage is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Jul 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluOgre View Post
I just got a priceprotection sheet from my distributor for Warner titles and there are HD-DVD titles reducing in price. It seems Warner is dropping titles from $34.99 to $27.99 SRP.

Probably not the first wave of cuts for HD-DVD but I did find it funny that the Blu-ray version of those titles were not reduced (like Happy Feet, Departed, Fountain, ect...).
Thanks, BluOgre!

Seriously... thanks! Your posts here have been a great window into the rental retail space that we don't often see from news reports - and for sure the other insiders haven't been saying anything.

It really goes to show how far and how seriously Warner is taking this. All the HD DVD fanatics who think they just received a payoff are living in a bubble; I sincerely doubt if they were just taking a payoff, they'd be going to extreme measures like delaying almost every HD DVD release, and cutting MSRPs to blow out inventory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:26 PM   #39
goodstuff goodstuff is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
goodstuff's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
509
6535
85
6
Default

Here's the official word from Warner

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/sh...s_HD_DVDs/1364

Warner Outlines HD DVD Separation Plan; Delays 'Invasion,' 'Jesse James' HD DVDs
Fri Jan 11, 2008 at 03:20 PM ET
Tags: Warner (all tags)

Formalizing the first step in its HD DVD separation plan, Warner has pushed back the previously-announced HD DVD releases of 'The Invasion' and 'The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford.'

As we first reported late last week, Warner stated in their original Blu-ray exclusivity announcement that although they would continue to support HD DVD through May, their HD DVD releases would now follow their Blu-ray release by "a short window."

The studio has now confirmed the first titles to be affected by the transition, announcing a three-week-delay for the HD DVD/DVD combo versions of 'The Invasion' (now February 19, previously January 29), and 'The Assassination of Jesse James' (which will shift from February 26 to March 18).

Street dates for the previously Blu-ray and standard DVD versions of both titles remain as originally scheduled.

The studio has told us to expect a three-week delay for all of its remaining HD DVD/DVD combo titles through the May 2008 cut-off date, but that they will officially announce the new dates over the next several weeks.

All Warner HD DVD catalog titles will remain unaffected by the transition, and are expected to street as originally announced (including such highly-anticipated titles as 'Bonnie & Clyde' and 'Twister').

Tech specs and special features for both 'Invasion' and 'Jesse James' remain as previously announced, and Warner says future delays will also not see any changes in specs.

As always, you'll find disc details for 'Invasion' and 'The Assassination of Jess James by the Coward Robert Ford' linked from our HD DVD Release Schedule, indexed under their new dates of
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 07:27 PM   #40
mystiksuicide mystiksuicide is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
mystiksuicide's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Miami
305
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter View Post
Evidently, Toshiba is dropping hardware prices again too.

The HD DVD liquidation sale begins!
I expect all Toshiba players to be at $99 by April 1. Fitting day to since it's April Fools Day.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
the Warner titles that were available on HD-DVD Blu-ray Movies - North America Jamie 47 07-25-2008 12:58 PM
Are there any Warner Bros HD DVD titles we can be expecting now? Blu-ray Movies - North America SBrooks1 27 01-05-2008 05:33 AM
How many Warner titles on HD DVD that are not on Blu-ray? General Chat blu-rayfan101 20 10-16-2007 08:49 PM
Why are Warner Titles Being Reissued on HD DVD? General Chat ReduxInflux 11 09-08-2007 07:25 PM
Warner Exec says hd dvd titles may be delayed Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology GTP 9 03-15-2006 12:53 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 AM.