Inglourious Basterds 4K UHD (2009)

[Avageektwit]

Originally Posted by lilboyblu

Where?

https://thedigitalbits.com/columns/m...ts/081121-1200

The source is trustworthy. I wouldn't comment otherwise.

[Stream]

Anyone outhere having information reg a possible 4K DI for the release ?
YTD IMDb states 2K for this full shot on film. PS : reportedly no CGI inside.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361748...ef_=tt_spec_sm
https://www.awn.com/vfxworld/dykstra...rious-basterds

[jerclay]

Originally Posted by Avageektwit

I'm thinking Tarantino, like Nolan, has no interest in approving immersive audio remixes of their films.

And God bless them for this!!!

[wildphantom]

Hopefully the rest of QT’s catalogue quickly follows this.

Two down, seven to go (unless you want to count Death Proof, which I do!)

[Apari]

Originally Posted by jerclay

And God bless them for this!!!

I think that it sucks that they don't allow people to have the best possible version of the movies at home. F.e. Dunkirk with atmos-mix would have been better than with the 5.1 mix.

[Jay Mammoth]

Originally Posted by Apari

I think that it sucks that they don't allow people to have the best possible version of the movies at home. F.e. Dunkirk with atmos-mix would have been better than with the 5.1 mix.

Best possible versions at home are what was in theaters.

[Sky_Captain]

Originally Posted by PegasusKenshiro

Wasn't even really a rumor, every post card they put out they end up turning into an official release. No idea why this was cancelled

There's a lot of assuming going on regarding the intended format of Arrow's version, formally announced or not.

[singhcr]

Originally Posted by Avageektwit

It has been confirmed that the HDR for this release will have Dolby Vision/HDR10+ & HDR10 along with the existing 5.1 DTS HD Master Audio track from the Blu-ray.

The original 5.1 is excellent, so that is good. But DTS-X or ATMOS would have been nice. I'm thinking Tarantino, like Nolan, has no interest in approving immersive audio remixes of their films.

I get that people like remixes, I used to go nuts over a really good DTS 5.1 remix especially back in ye olde DVD days. However as I have gotten older I am much more concerned about authenticity than anything else.

If the film has a 70mm 6 track mix, great let's use it. If it's a movie like say Hard Target and it just had stereo I would be mad as the film has a pretty fun 5.1 mix which many would have heard in DTS during its theatrical run. Would I be fine with Air Force One in stereo? Hell no. Is the movie in mono ala Taxi Driver? Great, let's keep it that way unless there was some special 70mm mix as well that we can also have on the disc.

If that Atmos or DTS:X mix was in addition to the original 5.1 I wouldn't care but if it is the only option I certainly would. In these situations if the remixes are missing I wouldn't shed a tear and this is coming from a guy who is planning a 7.2.4 setup when he gets his new house after hopefully riding out the insanity of the US housing market somewhat.

So I plan on getting all those speakers, but I want them all to be used when they are meant to be instead of insisting retroactively that they always should have been.

[Avageektwit]

Originally Posted by singhcr

I get that people like remixes, I used to go nuts over a really good DTS 5.1 remix especially back in ye olde DVD days. However as I have gotten older I am much more concerned about authenticity than anything else.

If the film has a 70mm 6 track mix, great let's use it. If it's a movie like say Hard Target and it just had stereo I would be mad as the film has a pretty fun 5.1 mix which many would have heard in DTS during its theatrical run. Would I be fine with Air Force One in stereo? Hell no. Is the movie in mono ala Taxi Driver? Great, let's keep it that way unless there was some special 70mm mix as well that we can also have on the disc.

If that Atmos or DTS:X mix was in addition to the original 5.1 I wouldn't care but if it is the only option I certainly would. In these situations if the remixes are missing I wouldn't shed a tear and this is coming from a guy who is planning a 7.2.4 setup when he gets his new house after hopefully riding out the insanity of the US housing market somewhat.

So I plan on getting all those speakers, but I want them all to be used when they are meant to be instead of insisting retroactively that they always should have been.

I understand. It's not a deal-breaker. But as long as they have a really good track regardless, I'll be fine. If they make a new immersive track that enhances the experience without removing the authenticity of the film, that's even greater, terrific example: The Indiana Jones trilogy on 4k recently.

[singhcr]

Originally Posted by Avageektwit

I understand. It's not a deal-breaker. But as long as they have a really good track regardless, I'll be fine. If they make a new immersive track that enhances the experience without removing the authenticity of the film, that's even greater, terrific example: The Indiana Jones trilogy on 4k recently.

Yup, that's always a welcome thing for something like the Indy set and I'm glad you and others can enjoy them

I just wish they had the original LRCS stereo and any 70mm mixes they may have had as well, as those mixes are part of the original theatrical experience.

[Lionel Horsepackage]

Will certainly be buying this right on Day One, but sweet Jesus, is Tarantino ever going to finally get around to approving a new HD transfer of Reservoir Dogs that doesn't look like sour frog-ass?

[rroeder]

Originally Posted by singhcr

So I plan on getting all those speakers, but I want them all to be used when they are meant to be instead of insisting retroactively that they always should have been.

Agreed, the upmix doesn't add much anyway and can take away from the main layer of speakers IMO, pretty much always used it when I added the overhead speakers but now I will switch to legacy mode on the receiver if it's a 5.1/7.1 mix

*edit: I usually choose the newer mix over the original tho

[roar]

Originally Posted by wildphantom

Hopefully the rest of QT’s catalogue quickly follows this.

Two down, seven to go (unless you want to count Death Proof, which I do!)

It's not complete without Deathproof! Deathproof was in my top 5 Tarantino flicks until Once Upon a Time... it has been pushed down to 6 .

[starman15317]

It looks like most, but not all, of the special features are being ported over. I wonder if that is actually the case or if things just weren't included in the press release.

[dallywhitty]

Originally Posted by starman15317

It looks like most, but not all, of the special features are being ported over. I wonder if that is actually the case or if things just weren't included in the press release.

It could go either way. It does feel like press releases are becoming increasingly unreliable. I've seen about four or five different breakdowns of what the A Clockwork Orange UHD is supposed to contain.

[Monterey Jack]

Originally Posted by mlabonte21

I can't wait to see the detail on that strudel.

[Ricky G]

Originally Posted by Monterey Jack

Mouth watering. Wait for the cream!

[NoFro]

I don't revisit my favourite films as often as I'd like but the slew of catalogue titles this year has given me plenty of reason to revisit a lot of my favourites.

[paulboland]

Originally Posted by PowellPressburger

I’d bet Universal gave Arrow something else in place of I.B.

Probably came down to Q.T. & bonus features and it’s really best Universal release I.B.

let Arrow have another film that they can do some good for.

Universal 4K UHD release has same extras as previous Blu-ray release

If arrow release is still happening you can expect new disc extras be done and packaging differences

It would not be unusual to have Universal and Arrow do separate releases
They would be different releases and different release dates

[GasmaskAvenger]

if this is still on the cards for Arrow to put it out, i'll just wait for their release as i'm sure their 1080p disc will be the new 4K master instead of just a recycled, decade old Universal blu-ray.