Help Me Decide - Clash of the Titans or Prince of Persia? - Page 3 - Blu-ray Forum

TOPDAWG · 08-11-2010, 09:08 AM

Prince of Persia cause while it was just ok clash of the titans was just god awful I mean so awful the markers should burn in hell for making it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzsoad

I just finished watching Clash of the Titans, a very solid Blu-ray in both PQ and AQ. In my opinion it's better than the original in almost every way. Not the greatest story but oh so nice to look at. I thought it was a lot of fun. Why not get Clash of the Titans now and get Prince of Persia when that movie decides to release?

WHAT!? my anger knows no bends reading this sir. I release the kraken on your soul sir.

mpstjohn · 08-11-2010, 01:10 PM

I enjoyed both films, but if I had to choose I'd take Clash. Better cast overall, even if for the most part they're chewing scenery. The special effects and action sequences are more diverse too. More re-watchable than Prince, which I'm only picking up to see Gemma in hi-def.

repete66211 · 08-11-2010, 01:20 PM

I didn't see Prince of Persia because it looked pretty cheesy. I saw Clash of the Titans and can attest it is a horrible movie. Needless to say, I voted "Neither". Too many good movies out there (and soon to be out there) to waste your money on crap.

Kryptonic · 08-11-2010, 03:44 PM

Neither. Just buy Lord of the Rings instead.

chrisximages · 08-16-2010, 04:38 AM

I have watched both and i found COTT to be a lot more watchable than POT. The storyline for POT was good but the acting was poor. I am going to buy COTT when the price drops.

Evra · 08-16-2010, 04:39 AM

Prince of Persia if you have to.

chrisximages · 08-16-2010, 04:40 AM

[QUOTE=TOPDAWG;3607285]Prince of Persia cause while it was just ok clash of the titans was just god awful I mean so awful the markers should burn in hell for making it.

hehehe ... thats a bit strong :-)

Sabotage · 08-16-2010, 04:44 AM

Neither. Get something good.

Nikka488 · 08-18-2010, 08:36 PM

I've seen both and imo I would go with PoP. If you temper your expectations (see everyone's comments) you'll likely be happy with either.

I'll probably pick up both at some point when the price is right ($10 or less).

I had such low expectations going into Clash it I ended up enjoying it. It did seem short though. From the middle to the end they really raced through a lot of story.

PoP I had heard was ok and it didn't do well enough in the theaters to become the next franchise for Disney. My expectations weren't as low as COTT, but I didn't expect a winner. I enjoyed it. It reminded me of The Mummy but with a little less comedy and some better action. But that's just me.

homer5ive · 08-18-2010, 11:59 PM

Thats like asking, which is better? Severe anal leakage or violent diarrhea?

Cinemave · 10-20-2010, 08:12 PM

I won't be adding either to my collection, but I preferred COTT. I found POP dragged in spots as the plot seemed a little thin. I'd rent both and then decide.

CZAR · 10-20-2010, 10:42 PM

I love Clash and thought PoP was good also. I would get both but if I could only get one it would be Clash for sure. Got Em!!

Blu-Benny · 10-20-2010, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cinemave

I won't be adding either to my collection, but I preferred COTT. I found POP dragged in spots as the plot seemed a little thin. I'd rent both and then decide.

nothing like bumping a 2 month old thread.....esp. for one about movies that have been out for quite a while.

View Poll Results: Which did you like better - Clash of the Titans or Prince of Persia?
Clash of the Titans	21	16.03%
Prince of Persia	59	45.04%
Both	23	17.56%
Neither	28	21.37%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

08-16-2010, 04:38 AM	#45
chrisximages Member Member since:Jun 2010 Blu-ray collection:80	Clash of the Titans I have watched both and i found COTT to be a lot more watchable than POT. The storyline for POT was good but the acting was poor. I am going to buy COTT when the price drops.

08-16-2010, 04:40 AM	#47
chrisximages Member Member since:Jun 2010 Blu-ray collection:80	Re: COTT [QUOTE=TOPDAWG;3607285]Prince of Persia cause while it was just ok clash of the titans was just god awful I mean so awful the markers should burn in hell for making it. hehehe ... thats a bit strong :-)

08-11-2010, 01:10 PM	#42
mpstjohn Blu-ray Guru Member since:Apr 2008 Location:Virginia Beach, VA Home Theater Gallery:30 4K collection:9 Blu-ray collection:463 DVD collection:225 Digital collection:273 Blu-ray reviews: 2 Trading Score:33	I enjoyed both films, but if I had to choose I'd take Clash. Better cast overall, even if for the most part they're chewing scenery. The special effects and action sequences are more diverse too. More re-watchable than Prince, which I'm only picking up to see Gemma in hi-def.

08-11-2010, 01:20 PM	#43
repete66211 Blu-ray Samurai Top contributor Member since:Jan 2009 Location:Kansas City area Home Theater Gallery:10 Blu-ray collection:196 Blu-ray reviews:1 Trading Score:3	I didn't see Prince of Persia because it looked pretty cheesy. I saw Clash of the Titans and can attest it is a horrible movie. Needless to say, I voted "Neither". Too many good movies out there (and soon to be out there) to waste your money on crap.

08-11-2010, 03:44 PM	#44
Kryptonic Suspended Member since:Jul 2009 Trading Score:45	Neither. Just buy Lord of the Rings instead.

08-16-2010, 04:39 AM	#46
Evra Power Member Top contributor Member since:Dec 2009 Location:Singapore Home Theater Gallery:1 Blu-ray collection:- Blu-ray reviews:12 Trading Score:1	Prince of Persia if you have to.

08-16-2010, 04:44 AM	#48
Sabotage Expert Member Member since:Dec 2009 Location:Vancouver, British Columbia Blu-ray collection:84 Blu-ray reviews:1	Neither. Get something good.

08-18-2010, 08:36 PM	#49
Nikka488 Senior Member Member since:Feb 2010 Location:N.Cali Home Theater Gallery:25 4K collection:131 Blu-ray collection:1334 DVD collection:619 Digital collection:23 iTunes collection:12 Prime collection:2 Blu-ray reviews:4 Trading Score:1	I've seen both and imo I would go with PoP. If you temper your expectations (see everyone's comments) you'll likely be happy with either. I'll probably pick up both at some point when the price is right ($10 or less). I had such low expectations going into Clash it I ended up enjoying it. It did seem short though. From the middle to the end they really raced through a lot of story. PoP I had heard was ok and it didn't do well enough in the theaters to become the next franchise for Disney. My expectations weren't as low as COTT, but I didn't expect a winner. I enjoyed it. It reminded me of The Mummy but with a little less comedy and some better action. But that's just me.

08-18-2010, 11:59 PM	#50
homer5ive Member Member since:Jan 2009 Blu-ray collection:15 Blu-ray reviews:2	Thats like asking, which is better? Severe anal leakage or violent diarrhea?

10-20-2010, 08:12 PM	#51
Cinemave Senior Member Member since:Aug 2010 Location:Chicago Blu-ray collection:399 Blu-ray reviews: 9	I won't be adding either to my collection, but I preferred COTT. I found POP dragged in spots as the plot seemed a little thin. I'd rent both and then decide.

10-20-2010, 10:42 PM	#52
CZAR Blu-ray Prince Member since:Jul 2009 Location:Camp Crystal lake 4K collection:72 Blu-ray collection:312 Blu-ray reviews:1 Trading Score:75	I love Clash and thought PoP was good also. I would get both but if I could only get one it would be Clash for sure. Got Em!!

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals