As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
6 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
1 day ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.44
1 day ago
Daiei Gothic: Japanese Ghost Stories Vol. 2 (Blu-ray)
$47.99
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Creepshow 2 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
Wallace & Gromit: The Complete Cracking Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$13.99
10 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2007, 06:56 PM   #41
BadAss BadAss is offline
Senior Member
 
BadAss's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
England
63
63
Default

If the BDA were smart they might do better going after Walmart or Best buy, it would make WBs decision completely academic. Maybe thats what they're waiting for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 07:04 PM   #42
DrinkMore DrinkMore is offline
Banned
 
DrinkMore's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
That's What She Said!
140
7
3
Default

Well, I am not sure why - but when I saw the commericals for Blade Runner - there was NO mention/picture of HD-DVD. It said own it on DVD and HD today! With a picture of the DVD and Blu-Ray. NO HD-DVD.

Does this mean anything? Probably not. Will WB go blu? One can only hope, however it's all speculation right now and it's not looking too good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 09:46 PM   #43
sparksj sparksj is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DealsR4theDevil View Post
Thats a great analogy, but you forgot the part where you tell us what the hell your talking about?
LOL

My concern is that we are all so focused on weekly sales that we're losing site of many other pieces of data that Warner could also be considering when determining what format they might chose. I think a lot of things can happen at CES. And a bunch of us running out and buying discs we don't even care about watching will not change that.

Sales as a whole are not a big enough piece of the pie to make a studio chose yet. Obvoiusly Paramount didn't consider sales in their move to HD DVD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 09:53 PM   #44
Hawknelson05 Hawknelson05 is offline
Banned
 
Hawknelson05's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Gainesville
1
Default

ugh, I just hope everything doesn't turn out like video games i.e. having to buy the other console to buy their games and warner staying neutral unitl the end of the world
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 09:57 PM   #45
DealsR4theDevil DealsR4theDevil is offline
Power Member
 
Sep 2007
76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparksj View Post
LOL

My concern is that we are all so focused on weekly sales that we're losing site of many other pieces of data that Warner could also be considering when determining what format they might chose. I think a lot of things can happen at CES. And a bunch of us running out and buying discs we don't even care about watching will not change that.

Sales as a whole are not a big enough piece of the pie to make a studio chose yet. Obvoiusly Paramount didn't consider sales in their move to HD DVD.
True. However, when Paramount took the $150 million and a similar deal was offered to WB, WB said no. They officially said that they would be watching Q4 sales and basing their decision on that. They did not specify between Disc or Player sales, but thats because they will prolly be looking at both.

Now even if HD DVD were to have more stand alones, WB knows that the BDA has all those PS3s out there. Couple that with a 52-0 year and the choice becomes clear.

If they pull a Paramount on us then it will be even more of a low blow than when Paramount did it. Warner promised to base their decision on sales (specifically Q4), Paramount never made such a promise (they did promise us many movies that were gonna come out but thats another story).

I have no doubt that Warner said they will be basing their decision on sales to get people on both sides to buy more of their movies. But after a 52-0 year they have to honor their promise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:01 PM   #46
sleazypig sleazypig is offline
Active Member
 
sleazypig's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Default

Warner cares about themeselves. They have 40 percent of the hdm market and I think they like it this way. They will probably stay nuetral until it stops working for them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:37 PM   #47
LeoneFan LeoneFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparksj View Post
Sales as a whole are not a big enough piece of the pie to make a studio chose yet. Obvoiusly Paramount didn't consider sales in their move to HD DVD.
There was nothing for Paramount to consider. They took the $150 million and ran.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:42 PM   #48
BillCable BillCable is offline
Expert Member
 
BillCable's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
1
1
Send a message via Yahoo to BillCable
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleazypig View Post
Warner cares about themeselves. They have 40 percent of the hdm market and I think they like it this way. They will probably stay nuetral until it stops working for them.
40% of a market that's heavily constrained because fence-sitters won't jump in without a clear winner is much, MUCH smaller than 30% of a booming 1-format market. Warner knows this very well, which is why they've indicated they're ready to change tactics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 10:49 PM   #49
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAss View Post
Because if you give your word and announce titles at CES for both formats, it seems contradictory to dump one or the other a month or two months later. In future business you wouldn't believe another word they'd say. WB at least seem to have some morals and business sense.
There are already announced titles for after CES (e.g. Bonny and Clyde March 25 and Twister for May 6). So, why is anyone expecting anything for CES?

It is possible they do release those titles AND they go exclusive after any committments.

Gary
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 11:14 PM   #50
sj001 sj001 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
sj001's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Rochester, NY
317
17
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialog_gvf View Post
It is possible they do release those titles AND they go exclusive after any committments.

Gary
This is what I am hoping for...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 11:40 PM   #51
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallville206 View Post
I just don't see the point of WB staying neutral and extending this out. Maybe they just want to do it on their timetable instead of when a lot of people were assuming, but it's still ridiculous. .
Maybe Warner is as tired of everyone else saying they are going Blu as they were of Toshiba and MS trying to bribe them. Maybe they are going to make a choice when they are good and ready, and not when everyone else is ready.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 11:42 PM   #52
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Warner is getting their fingers into everything and is a saving grace in this stupid format war.

How is that a "saving grace"? Staying with dud will only prolong the war. This guy doesn't make any sense.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 04:52 AM   #53
beavis667 beavis667 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDude View Post
Not that I believe this will happen, but if for some insane reason Warner went to exclusive HD-DVD it would not end the war. It would create a 50/50 split in support between Bluray and HDDVD. They would then be on equal ground. If Warner went Bluray it's a different story, it would then be 70/30 Bluray advantage and the war would probably be over.
I think if Warner went HD-DVD exclusive, CEs would push out dual format players to save HDM. Face it, if every CE that is making HD-DVD systems and Blu-Ray systems had dual format players, this format war would be a non isssue. Of course if they did go BD exclusive, then the war would be over in short order.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 05:19 AM   #54
Thegide Thegide is offline
Senior Member
 
Thegide's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Ottawa, ON
Default

It's clear there are more factors playing in than any of us realize.

Ultimately superior blu-ray sales will pay off. The market will not support two formats forever, period. I don't think it's a question of which side they will take, as it is when they will take it. A decision will be reached based on a combination of short-term and long-term benefits.

Perhaps they are still eeking out benefits of holding onto HD DVD for now. This may be due to its market share, or their investment in the technology, or contracts, etc. But there is a tipping point beyond where it becomes disadvantageous to support both formats. That tipping point is when they will announce exclusivity.

I think many people, including myself, got their hopes up that it would be over at CES. If you think Warner is naive to Blu's market superiority, you're fooling yourself. Executives' comments aside, it's fairly clear which side is winning, and its easy to see that the advantages HD DVD holds dear to it are fading away. My only hope is that they perceive enough urgency to make the move in time to ensure mass adoption.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 02:29 AM   #55
saprano saprano is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
saprano's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Bronx, New York
495
2
9
Send a message via AIM to saprano
Default

bump
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 02:35 AM   #56
richard lichtenfelt richard lichtenfelt is offline
Power Member
 
richard lichtenfelt's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
I'm not drunk, I'm just tired cause I been up all night drinking.
3
Default

^and grind
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 05:49 AM   #57
Geech Geech is offline
Active Member
 
Geech's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Reading, PA
2
Default

The next couple weeks will be very interesting
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 05:52 AM   #58
wisper9999 wisper9999 is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2007
MA
145
2
Default

That would be wicked of they went blu
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Blu-Ray Press Conference Video! Blu-ray Movies - North America RustyK94 0 01-09-2009 11:51 PM
Seems like Warner will appear at the HD DVD CES press conference General Chat domerdel 21 12-22-2007 12:16 AM
Ceatec Japan 2007 Blu-ray Conference Blu-ray domination Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Tekman 4 10-04-2007 08:54 PM
Interesting: Warner was not present at the HD DVD IFA conference Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Tekman 37 09-02-2007 07:12 PM
Warner press conference. HD DVD only 2x BD disc sales for 2006! Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology dialog_gvf 8 01-10-2007 06:32 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46 PM.