As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
1 day ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
1 day ago
U-571 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
20 hrs ago
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
1 day ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$21.31
14 hrs ago
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
1 day ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$68.47
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Dogtooth 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
 
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2007, 07:43 PM   #61
Petey Pablo Petey Pablo is offline
Member
 
Petey Pablo's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default

Well I guess this sends a message to studios like Universal and others that are holding back on films that the public wants to see on Blu. It is time that we start opening up their eyes and let them understand that there is a market out there, and people want to see their favorite films on BD. For people like me I refuse to buy and watch any regular DVD that is put out by Universal, or even go to Universal stidios untill this war is over,........we can call this my own personal vendetta.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:06 PM   #62
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1162
7061
4065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil View Post
What's your data or proof that this statement is true and factual and not speculation? Do you feel Warner is to lose a bunch of money in the near future? And approximately what is the timeline for this to occur? Clearly it's bad business so I just wanna see the evidence of all of this.
the average consumer (what people call joe6packs or other stuff) see 2 High Def formats and say screw that, I'll wait till the war is over and keep buying DVDs. I've seen even Disney aficionados that buy every slipcover variation in DVD, say they won't buy till the war is over, even when their favorite studio is releasing high quality High Def discs. It's Uncertainty and Doubt that eats profits. I'm sure if there was no war, individual titles sales would automatically increase in a blink. Meaning 300 -> much more than 250,000 copies. Having 2 formats is confusing and ultimately it is a BRAKE on sales.

Much more than 250,000 copies > 250,000 copies and would make more money to Warner than 250,000 copies. which is your argument. If there was only one format, the same 85,000 people that bought the HD DVD third of the 250,000 figure, would have bought the UNI-FORMAT copies of that title. So HD DVD sales are not an adittion of sales, it's a bifurcation of overall HIGH DEFINITION sales that are being slowed down by the two format BRAKE.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:09 PM   #63
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

woohoo!! I just got my copy of 300 in the mail today from Amazon. Can't wait to watch it tonight.

OK Warner, get the hint yet? 300 sold like crazy on Blu. Gimme Batman Begins and the Matrix trilogy already!!

Last edited by Razzy; 08-08-2007 at 08:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:11 PM   #64
The Big Blue The Big Blue is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Big Blue's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
98
1
Default

"HD DVD is the format of choice for great sci-fi content, from movies and hit TV shows to the classics," said Ken Graffeo, co-president of the HD DVD Promotional Group. "Heroes: Season 1 and the original Star Trek series are only available on HD DVD, and blockbuster titles such as 300 have interactive features you can only find here. HD DVD is the format that caters to the fan base."

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:20 PM   #65
caliminius caliminius is offline
Senior Member
 
Aug 2007
The Negative Zone
84
Default Give me a minute...

Quote:
Originally Posted by phil View Post
GLad to see that those PS3 owners finally decided to try out their Blu Ray player, LOL. Now if we could only convince them to buy more flicks.
I'm working on it for pity's sake! I've only had the thing for 3 weeks...

I've bought 7 movies thus far, and I have another 6 on pre-order (8 technically since the one is the Spider-Man trilogy). It would be 7 if Amazon would put up Close Encounters of the Third Kind for preorder. I've been trying to avoid (re)buying movies I already own on DVD (but I'm tempted to see how gorgeous the newly remastered version of The Fifth Element looks and move up to 3 times I've bought the bloody film).
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:23 PM   #66
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by caliminius View Post
I'm working on it for pity's sake! I've only had the thing for 3 weeks...

I've bought 7 movies thus far, and I have another 6 on pre-order (8 technically since the one is the Spider-Man trilogy). It would be 7 if Amazon would put up Close Encounters of the Third Kind for preorder. I've been trying to avoid (re)buying movies I already own on DVD (but I'm tempted to see how gorgeous the newly remastered version of The Fifth Element looks and move up to 3 times I've bought the bloody film).
I've had my PS3 since December and got about 30 Blu-Ray movies, including The Fifth Element (remasterd). I gotta tell you, the PQ is amazing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:35 PM   #67
jtconnolly jtconnolly is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
jtconnolly's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
102
1
Default

where is this data coming from, I can;t find these %'s USA today had access to. Where is this actual data?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:38 PM   #68
phil phil is offline
Banned
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
the average consumer (what people call joe6packs or other stuff) see 2 High Def formats and say screw that, I'll wait till the war is over and keep buying DVDs. I've seen even Disney aficionados that buy every slipcover variation in DVD, say they won't buy till the war is over, even when their favorite studio is releasing high quality High Def discs. It's Uncertainty and Doubt that eats profits. I'm sure if there was no war, individual titles sales would automatically increase in a blink. Meaning 300 -> much more than 250,000 copies. Having 2 formats is confusing and ultimately it is a BRAKE on sales.

Much more than 250,000 copies > 250,000 copies and would make more money to Warner than 250,000 copies. which is your argument. If there was only one format, the same 85,000 people that bought the HD DVD third of the 250,000 figure, would have bought the UNI-FORMAT copies of that title. So HD DVD sales are not an adittion of sales, it's a bifurcation of overall HIGH DEFINITION sales that are being slowed down by the two format BRAKE.

Well if you're so sure that all of this is true why isn't Warner Listening to you? So they really are committing business suicide, when do you think they'll claim bankruptcy?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:39 PM   #69
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1162
7061
4065
Default

Research this forum for Warner threads, you'll find the answer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:41 PM   #70
phil phil is offline
Banned
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
Research this forum for Warner threads, you'll find the answer.
I highly doubt this forum or anyone in this forum has the answer to that question, LoL. So when do you think Warner will claim Bankruptcy though?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:44 PM   #71
jtconnolly jtconnolly is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
jtconnolly's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
102
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
Research this forum for Warner threads, you'll find the answer.
I did, to no prevail. 65 to 35 seems a little erroneous to me but hope it is true. anyone know where these numbers came from? USA today has to have decent sources before writing, don't they?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:46 PM   #72
grip24 grip24 is offline
Active Member
 
grip24's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Coral Springs, Fl
390
971
6
Default

Check out what the hd-dvds guys are saying over at avs.....

Exactly Plazman..not only that..here I'll show some simple math here..

Sold units ratio means very little when the bottom line is MONEY, not how many units they sold..

So if we compare how much MONEY Warner made on Blu-Ray and how much on HD DVD version..we get a bit different story

For the ratio of 65:35 for number of sold units Warners gross income from titles looks like this:

- 300 on HD DVD combo sold 87,500 units @ $35, some places like Target now the combo is going for $39.99

- 300 on Blu-Ray sold 162,500 units @ 24.95. The price is pretty equal everywhere.

Now pay attention at the power of HD DVD:

- Blu-Ray 300 grossed them $4,060,875
- HD DVD 300 grossed them $3,045,000

Keep in mind that HD DVD version at $35 was sold at some places for $39.99 but let's keep it clean at $35. Sure somewhere you could get it for $28 but the middle grounds would be $35. Not only that but I'm pretty certain that printing HD DVD versions cost them less so their profit margin has increased too.

When you do a little math out of $7,105,875 that they made on both titles if they sold 250k units. Warner's actual gross income in percentage is

57:43 in favor of Blu-Ray. Now this is truly impressive. Being in SHORT supply of HD DVD titles, and despite the fact that there's 10:1 Blu-Ray players out there, HD DVD actually almost manages to make almost 50% of hi-def sale for Warner, pointing out that number of SOLD units is not the only way to look at things.

To put things in perspective, let's assume that in the upcoming months, Warner increases shipped number of units for HD DVD to retail chains and sells the same number of titles..I will use 300 for reference again.

250k units as a sample... 50:50 number of sold copies the gross income for Warner looks like this:

125k units HD DVD sold @ $35 = 4,375,000
125k units BLu-Ray sold @ $25 = 3,125,000

That's 58:42 ratio in gross income in favor of HD DVD.

So, if a studio sells the SAME amount of HD DVD combo titles as Blu-Ray ones (which is not THAT far fetched) they actually make close to 60:40 ration money wise in favor of HD DVD.

This is where the power of HD DVD is..and don't forget again, we are talking about 10:1 in number of PLAYERs on the market. That's what I call consumer POWER.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:47 PM   #73
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1162
7061
4065
Default

I don't think Warner will ever claim bankruptcy.




Every day it's aftermidnight and the water doesn't stop

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Big Blue View Post
"HD DVD is the format of choice for great sci-fi content, from movies and hit TV shows to the classics," said Ken Graffeo, co-president of the HD DVD Promotional Group. "Heroes: Season 1 and the original Star Trek series are only available on HD DVD, and blockbuster titles such as 300 have interactive features you can only find here. HD DVD is the format that caters to the fan base."


I guess the Fifth Element, Planet of The Apes, Æon Flux, and Close Encounters Of The Third Kind are not Science Fiction (but BD-50s are!), the Sopranos Rescue Me and Lost can't be watched on Blu-ray, and I'm really really missing out by not watching irteractive features while doing what I really want, which is watch the MOVIE. Excuse me while I get some cool rigntones so I can be confused by my cel with a cry that will make me think is it HD DVD or is it Cingularex? and make me pause the slash of a leg to check.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:51 PM   #74
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

Man what will they think of next?
Maybe the HD-DVD costs more cause it was more expensive to make with all those "extras"? Oh, and maybe that assumption that they all cost that price is wrong. Many places I saw did not have the combo version of it on HD-DVD.
I don't know what their smoking, but I think it sounds something like denial.

Even with those facts, it only goes to show that the Blu-ray version against an unreasonable assumption of price is STILL making them more than a million dollars more!

GAH!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:52 PM   #75
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grip24 View Post
Check out what the hd-dvds guys are saying over at avs.....

Exactly Plazman..not only that..here I'll show some simple math here..

Sold units ratio means very little when the bottom line is MONEY, not how many units they sold..

So if we compare how much MONEY Warner made on Blu-Ray and how much on HD DVD version..we get a bit different story

For the ratio of 65:35 for number of sold units Warners gross income from titles looks like this:

- 300 on HD DVD combo sold 87,500 units @ $35, some places like Target now the combo is going for $39.99

- 300 on Blu-Ray sold 162,500 units @ 24.95. The price is pretty equal everywhere.

Now pay attention at the power of HD DVD:

- Blu-Ray 300 grossed them $4,060,875
- HD DVD 300 grossed them $3,045,000

Keep in mind that HD DVD version at $35 was sold at some places for $39.99 but let's keep it clean at $35. Sure somewhere you could get it for $28 but the middle grounds would be $35. Not only that but I'm pretty certain that printing HD DVD versions cost them less so their profit margin has increased too.

When you do a little math out of $7,105,875 that they made on both titles if they sold 250k units. Warner's actual gross income in percentage is

57:43 in favor of Blu-Ray. Now this is truly impressive. Being in SHORT supply of HD DVD titles, and despite the fact that there's 10:1 Blu-Ray players out there, HD DVD actually almost manages to make almost 50% of hi-def sale for Warner, pointing out that number of SOLD units is not the only way to look at things.

To put things in perspective, let's assume that in the upcoming months, Warner increases shipped number of units for HD DVD to retail chains and sells the same number of titles..I will use 300 for reference again.

250k units as a sample... 50:50 number of sold copies the gross income for Warner looks like this:

125k units HD DVD sold @ $35 = 4,375,000
125k units BLu-Ray sold @ $25 = 3,125,000

That's 58:42 ratio in gross income in favor of HD DVD.

So, if a studio sells the SAME amount of HD DVD combo titles as Blu-Ray ones (which is not THAT far fetched) they actually make close to 60:40 ration money wise in favor of HD DVD.

This is where the power of HD DVD is..and don't forget again, we are talking about 10:1 in number of PLAYERs on the market. That's what I call consumer POWER.
Where in the hell are they getting this garbage from?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:52 PM   #76
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grip24 View Post
For the ratio of 65:35 for number of sold units Warners gross income from titles looks like this:

- 300 on HD DVD combo sold 87,500 units @ $35, some places like Target now the combo is going for $39.99

- 300 on Blu-Ray sold 162,500 units @ 24.95. The price is pretty equal everywhere.

Now pay attention at the power of HD DVD:

- Blu-Ray 300 grossed them $4,060,875
- HD DVD 300 grossed them $3,045,000
So, with it at $27.95 on Amazon, all 87,500 units sold @$35?

Maybe Warner should double the price of HD DVD and really clean up.

Gary

P.S. See the sig.

"100% HD - FORMAT NEUTRAL - HD DVD SUPPORTER"

A format neutral HD DVD supporter. Wild.

Last edited by dialog_gvf; 08-08-2007 at 08:57 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 08:53 PM   #77
grip24 grip24 is offline
Active Member
 
grip24's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Coral Springs, Fl
390
971
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptGreedle View Post
Man what will they think of next?
Maybe the HD-DVD costs more cause it was more expensive to make with all those "extras"? Oh, and maybe that assumption that they all cost that price is wrong. Many places I saw did not have the combo version of it on HD-DVD.
I don't know what their smoking, but I think it sounds something like denial.

Even with those facts, it only goes to show that the Blu-ray version against an unreasonable assumption of price is STILL making them more than a million dollars more!

GAH!
heres the link to that.....
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1&page=3&pp=30
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 09:08 PM   #78
The Big Blue The Big Blue is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Big Blue's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
98
1
Default

That's some funny ass chit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 09:15 PM   #79
atomik kinder atomik kinder is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jun 2007
Omaha NE
-
-
-
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grip24 View Post
Check out what the hd-dvds guys are saying over at avs.....

Exactly Plazman..not only that..here I'll show some simple math here..

Sold units ratio means very little when the bottom line is MONEY, not how many units they sold..

So if we compare how much MONEY Warner made on Blu-Ray and how much on HD DVD version..we get a bit different story

For the ratio of 65:35 for number of sold units Warners gross income from titles looks like this:

- 300 on HD DVD combo sold 87,500 units @ $35, some places like Target now the combo is going for $39.99

- 300 on Blu-Ray sold 162,500 units @ 24.95. The price is pretty equal everywhere.

Now pay attention at the power of HD DVD:

- Blu-Ray 300 grossed them $4,060,875
- HD DVD 300 grossed them $3,045,000

Keep in mind that HD DVD version at $35 was sold at some places for $39.99 but let's keep it clean at $35. Sure somewhere you could get it for $28 but the middle grounds would be $35. Not only that but I'm pretty certain that printing HD DVD versions cost them less so their profit margin has increased too.

When you do a little math out of $7,105,875 that they made on both titles if they sold 250k units. Warner's actual gross income in percentage is

57:43 in favor of Blu-Ray. Now this is truly impressive. Being in SHORT supply of HD DVD titles, and despite the fact that there's 10:1 Blu-Ray players out there, HD DVD actually almost manages to make almost 50% of hi-def sale for Warner, pointing out that number of SOLD units is not the only way to look at things.

To put things in perspective, let's assume that in the upcoming months, Warner increases shipped number of units for HD DVD to retail chains and sells the same number of titles..I will use 300 for reference again.

250k units as a sample... 50:50 number of sold copies the gross income for Warner looks like this:

125k units HD DVD sold @ $35 = 4,375,000
125k units BLu-Ray sold @ $25 = 3,125,000

That's 58:42 ratio in gross income in favor of HD DVD.

So, if a studio sells the SAME amount of HD DVD combo titles as Blu-Ray ones (which is not THAT far fetched) they actually make close to 60:40 ration money wise in favor of HD DVD.

This is where the power of HD DVD is..and don't forget again, we are talking about 10:1 in number of PLAYERs on the market. That's what I call consumer POWER.
Yeah, real nice. How can you claim that the "on sale" price of the HD DVD is $10 more than the Blu-ray. When most places only had a $5 price difference, because of the SRP. Nice way to try to steer those numbers in the favor of HD DVD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 09:18 PM   #80
johnnyd1 johnnyd1 is offline
Expert Member
 
johnnyd1's Avatar
 
May 2007
RightBehindU, PA.
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTK View Post
Where in the hell are they getting this garbage from?
I'm telling ya...their brains are dead

Last edited by johnnyd1; 08-08-2007 at 09:24 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
New York Officialy out today on BD in USA India kskies2 45 09-30-2009 09:06 AM
USA Today: "Is the tug of war over high-def DVD format over?" Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology splax23 9 02-15-2008 06:23 PM
300: BD version outsells HD DVD 2/1 Blu-ray Movies - North America JTK 14 08-13-2007 11:09 PM
300 Blu-Ray Outsells HD Version 65%-35% Blu-ray Movies - North America Avalanche™ 2 08-08-2007 08:05 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 PM.