The Matrix 4K UHD (1999)

[SwaGGInTheShadows]

Originally Posted by Heapashifter

That'a the Korean version. They have a much smaller physical media market there and all their release are more expensive. $40 is what 4k releases cost there. I expect people to buy the version from their own country.

Also, it's not a money grab. That would be if we just got a new slipcover with the same disc. This is a movie being released on the latest format for the first time. Most of us are very excited about The Matrix 4k.

Well said

[infiniteCR]

Originally Posted by McCrutchy

Amazon now says the UK edition is three discs. Here is the back cover:

Those the old bluray screen grabs they use for the cover?

[Opips3]

Will you piss off on color greenish!!
That's Matrix!

Real blue on life earth?

[bradnoyes]

Originally Posted by Heapashifter

That'a the Korean version. They have a much smaller physical media market there and all their release are more expensive. $40 is what 4k releases cost there. I expect people to buy the version from their own country.

Also, it's not a money grab. That would be if we just got a new slipcover with the same disc. This is a movie being released on the latest format for the first time. Most of us are very excited about The Matrix 4k.

That guy went into a bunch of topics today claiming that all the releases were money grabs or that some 4K releases cost too much because the movie came out a long time ago. I would take his posts with a grain of salt.

[Opips3]

Originally Posted by bradnoyes

That guy went into a bunch of topics today claiming that all the releases were money grabs or that some 4K releases cost too much because the movie came out a long time ago. I would take his posts with a grain of salt.

Yeah. Practice business..

Not for you.

[ROSS.T.G.]

I’m pretty sure I paid $40 CDN for the DVD 20 years ago. I’m fine dropping $35 to own it on 4K.

[Mr Anderson]

Originally Posted by Pgcmoore

i imagine the steak is gonna look edible in 4k

We will need LOTS of Steak screen grabs for comparison.

Which one looks juicier and has better resolved highlights and detail.

[OutOfBoose]

^The only comparison that matters.

[gemcgee64]

Originally Posted by ROSS.T.G.

I’m pretty sure I paid $40 CDN for the DVD 20 years ago. I’m fine dropping $35 to own it on 4K.

Not jumping on this one. Waiting for the complete trilogy to come out on 4K....

[ROSS.T.G.]

Originally Posted by gemcgee64

Not jumping on this one. Waiting for the complete trilogy to come out on 4K....

I disapprove of your patience

[GeneD5]

Originally Posted by gemcgee64

Not jumping on this one. Waiting for the complete trilogy to come out on 4K....

I unfortunately think I’m with you.

I want it, but it’s nuts they aren’t releasing the trilogy.

[nick4Knight]

Originally Posted by ROSS.T.G.

I’m pretty sure I paid $40 CDN for the DVD 20 years ago. I’m fine dropping $35 to own it on 4K.

This figure doesn't account for inflation too. VHS often cost 60-80$ on release. In 80's money.

The market isn't overcharging us. I'd love all titles to be 10$, personally, but the factories and the delivery chain aren't streamlined enough yet. Elon Musk thinking on mass productions and distribution permitting we can expect under 10$ for these ...

We are just used to "deals" because of online retailers and sales and the companies sometimes having to stomach slim margins for pushing their stock. Or the studios rather a 'good look' on units sold than straight margins

[LaserDisk1]

Please be awesome!

[OutOfBoose]

Originally Posted by infiniteCR

Those the old bluray screen grabs they use for the cover?

Back cover screen grabs/photos are almost never reflective of the actual look of the film.

[Geoff D]

Yep. They're usually publicity stills, not "screen grabs".

[OutOfBoose]

Originally Posted by Geoff D

Yep. They're usually publicity stills, not "screen grabs".

And often color graded to match the box art.

[TheWildWhelk]

Originally Posted by gemcgee64

Not jumping on this one. Waiting for the complete trilogy to come out on 4K....

Can't think of a single reason that i want the second film on 4K. The third one maybe, but i'll stick with just the first for now.

[Sky_Captain]

Originally Posted by GeneD5

I unfortunately think I’m with you.

I want it, but it’s nuts they aren’t releasing the trilogy.

Matrix's 20th anniversary next year, calling it.

[Pgcmoore]

[IMG][/IMG]




it is juicy and delicious. after nine years, you know what i realize?

*takes a bite of steak

ignorance is bliss.





Barrie M. Osborne >
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0651614/?ref_=nv_sr_1

[OutOfBoose]

^Ordered these two boys too.