As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Happy Gilmore 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
1 hr ago
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$68.47
4 hrs ago
The Last Drive-In With Joe Bob Briggs (Blu-ray)
$14.49
4 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Shane 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Demon Slayer: Kimetsu No Yaiba Hashira Training Arc (Blu-ray)
$54.45
5 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2007, 02:16 PM   #141
Terjyn Terjyn is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Jul 2007
122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluperch View Post
I highly doubt that Warner is going to make their determination based on numbers sold.
Warner isn't stupid. The only reason to choose HD-DVD once profile 1.1 hits would be if more people were purchasing those players.

They aren't.

It's not just the numbers, it's the combination of flat out superiority AND numbers.

HD-DVD has been doomed for a long long time. The only question is would they drag Blu-Ray down with them or not.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:19 PM   #142
Esox50 Esox50 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jan 2007
420
492
Default

I'm only going to say one more thing. The signals have been there folks. Look at some posts from well respected Insiders here. Look at what has happened starting in August, including subsequent quotes from Ron Sanders and Dan Silverberg.

Still a rumor, but the "signals" are there...

Like Doby said, only an HD DVD "head buried in the sand" fanboy cannot see this coming. My only worry is whether M$ steps up to the plate with some ridiculous offer.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:23 PM   #143
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terjyn View Post
HD-DVD has been doomed for a long long time. The only question is would they drag Blu-Ray down with them or not.
You can bet the 800lb gorilla will try & extend this war as long as possible. I'v got a bad feeling their cooking up something as we speak.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:24 PM   #144
SpikesBluBlooded SpikesBluBlooded is offline
Special Member
 
SpikesBluBlooded's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Orlando, FL
719
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluperch View Post
I highly doubt that Warner is going to make their determination based on numbers sold. Right now, that's miniscule (oooo, blu sold 16,000 more copies of Harry Potter ... big whoop. Those numbers mean nothing to these companies). They know that with the right support, either side could still win this thing. One question to ask is does Warner really want one format? If yes, then some decision will be made soon. If no, then they'll wait (and wait, and wait) to "decide." Why they would want dual formats is beyond me as pretty much everyone's in agreement that the normal consumer won't buy into high def until a winner is declared (unless Warner is in bed with Microsoft and secretly are supporting high def downloads by pretending to decide on a format to support).

Warner's final decision will be based on politics and under-the-table deals more than anything else. Whichever camp can make the better promise wins. I'm guessing that behind the scenes, the political maneuvering is every bit as intense as anything happening in "real" politics right now. That's how Warner is going to make their determination.

An interesting perspective, especially regarding "under-the-table" deals as being a determining factor. I disagree, though. Here's a quote from the article:

"Warner isn't talking, but people close to the situation say the studio is waiting to see which group sells more of the new-fangled DVD players this holiday season. "Warner wants one of the two sides to make a commitment to getting this format into as many hands as possible," says a studio executive with knowledge of its thinking.

So far Toshiba has eked out a lead. According to industry tracker Adams Media Research, by the end of this year as many as 578,000 U.S. households will own HD DVD players, compared with 370,000 that have Blu-ray players. Adams also estimates there are 300,000 more HD DVD players in circulation inside Microsoft Xbox game consoles. But that still pales in comparison to the estimated 4 million Blu-ray-equipped Sony PlayStation 3 consoles sold in the U.S."


That all said, the key thing to take from that is: "getting this format into as many hands as possible". $150M deals and cheap promises only goes so far. In the end, Warner is thinking long-term, and that is, what's going to sell the most product and make them the most money in the end. Remember, the whole purpose of both Blu-ray and HD DVD is to replace DVDs as the vehicle of choice for home movie viewing.

If anything, Michael Bay's comments regarding Microsoft wanting both formats to fail should have executives asking if there might be any truth to that, and if so, what would be the best course of action to ensure that it doesn't. It's pretty obvious what the answer to that question is: support the superior format.

I think it's interesting that Paramount/Dreamworks stated that their decision was based on cost and affordability. Quite frankly, I think that was a BS comment to defer from the $150M deal that was made, but even if it were true, does that sound like a smart business decision? C'mon, the reason anyone is in business is to make money, why would you want to sell something for little or no profit? Just doesn't make sense, especially since retailers are selling both formats (software side) for the same price. And from what I've read, in the end it's more a matter of pennies, not dollars, in the cost difference of production. I don't have the links, I've seen them out here, but take that comment with a grain of salt until someone provides one.

In the end, I still contend that it's going to be a matter of who sells more movies. Warner doesn't manufacture players, and they're not going to make the distinction between PS3 and a stand-alone player as far as how many units are in consumers' hands, it's just going to be "how many Blu-ray players are out there?" That said, and looking at it from that perspective, Blu-ray is hands down the leader in both hardware and software, and the public at large has already started to show their preference.

Here's to the best product winning!

Last edited by SpikesBluBlooded; 12-07-2007 at 02:26 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:31 PM   #145
GregBlu5 GregBlu5 is offline
Power Member
 
GregBlu5's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Indio, CA
794
3954
2
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esox50 View Post
I'm only going to say one more thing. The signals have been there folks. Look at some posts from well respected Insiders here. Look at what has happened starting in August, including subsequent quotes from Ron Sanders and Dan Silverberg.

Still a rumor, but the "signals" are there...

Like Doby said, only an HD DVD "head buried in the sand" fanboy cannot see this coming. My only worry is whether M$ steps up to the plate with some ridiculous offer.
I certainly agree regarding the signals. And we are seeing signals from the retail outlets that are devoting more space to Blu. And we've also heard signals that the retailers don't want two formats much longer (that is the applicable aspect of the Betamax vs VHS war that does apply here).

(At this point, any money that M$ comes up with--and if they did succeed in bribing Warners--then it would have the potential of stagnating/strangling Hi Def disks indefinitely. That's why I don't believe that Warners is gonna bite on a bribe--it also didn't really help Paramount.)

As others have pointed out, there are too many consumer fence-sitters at this point who would jump into the fray if the war were over and there was a winner declared. That's the kind of profit that I believe Warners knows is out there and could take advantage of if they went with Blu exclusively.

The HDTVs are beginning to make their way into homes in ever increasing numbers. Those homes would then be ripe for Hi Def players, not just upconverts, and those players need disks to play in them. With the war over, all sorts of possiblities for profit are open. I don't really believe that Warners is that short sighted.

-Greg

Last edited by GregBlu5; 12-07-2007 at 02:37 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:32 PM   #146
zipbags zipbags is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

You cannot discount the power of Disney over consumers. When Disney starts to release their big guns (Nemo, Lion King, Cinderella,etc) you will see the average consumer start to look at HD. And it will be blu.

Has anyone asked a mod at AVS why they would delete a legitimate magazine article?? That makes no sense.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:33 PM   #147
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
You cannot discount the power of Disney over consumers. When Disney starts to release their big guns (Nemo, Lion King, Cinderella,etc)
Can't wait for Nemo and the Toy Story movies on Blu.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:34 PM   #148
statikcat statikcat is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
statikcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Washington, DC
67
Send a message via AIM to statikcat Send a message via Yahoo to statikcat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esox50 View Post
Like Doby said, only an HD DVD "head buried in the sand" fanboy cannot see this coming. My only worry is whether M$ steps up to the plate with some ridiculous offer.
I think Warner has too much pride to submit with money offering (bribe, etc) to Microsoft/Toshiba. At this point it would look bad and nobody is going to buy the whole "the money is for advertising" shit that Paramount gave us. Warner is a big studio with possibly the best catalog.. Paramount has a crappy catalog and is not releasing a good amount of releases either.

I am sure Sony/BDA would offer WB a GREAT deal on sales/licensing/royalties/etc. That is because Warner knows BD sells and they will benefit that way. That is good business. Paramount took 150m straight up because no offer on sales would matter because they are not selling many movies in HD. That is bad business.

Last edited by statikcat; 12-07-2007 at 02:37 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:34 PM   #149
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaliraver69 View Post
Everybody should support Warner by buying their BD's. Everyone on here should know about the Amazon Warner BOGO going on right now: http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.htm...72941&plpage=1
Great movies and great prices for movies like; 300, Troy, The Departed, Blood Diamond, etc.
I am not pleased with the "Warner Effect" of them converting the HD DVD movies to BD disc. But I still have several of their movies as the 30GB content is not bad. Not great, but not bad.

STAY AWAY FROM "THE BI-POLAR EXPRESS". That was a 15 Gb translation and you can hardly tell it is hi def. Utter piece of crap. THIS is what Toshiba wanted to sell as next generation DVD!?
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:35 PM   #150
Esox50 Esox50 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jan 2007
420
492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
Has anyone asked a mod at AVS why they would delete a legitimate magazine article?? That makes no sense.
A little birdie told me a while ago that it is considered fact in the industry that Microsoft "supports" that forum...
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:35 PM   #151
Living Near Shamu Living Near Shamu is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Living Near Shamu's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Austin, TX
42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzy View Post
You can bet the 800lb gorilla will try & extend this war as long as possible. I'v got a bad feeling their cooking up something as we speak.
If the news are true, and they are leaked out like they were, Toshiba will do anything to prevent Warner from going blu-exclusive.

Expect to hear somewhat of a 1/2 billion dollar payment.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:35 PM   #152
joeorc joeorc is offline
Power Member
 
joeorc's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
GROVEPORT ,OHIO
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpikesBluBlooded View Post
An interesting perspective, especially regarding "under-the-table" deals as being a determining factor. I disagree, though. Here's a quote from the article:

"Warner isn't talking, but people close to the situation say the studio is waiting to see which group sells more of the new-fangled DVD players this holiday season. "Warner wants one of the two sides to make a commitment to getting this format into as many hands as possible," says a studio executive with knowledge of its thinking.

So far Toshiba has eked out a lead. According to industry tracker Adams Media Research, by the end of this year as many as 578,000 U.S. households will own HD DVD players, compared with 370,000 that have Blu-ray players. Adams also estimates there are 300,000 more HD DVD players in circulation inside Microsoft Xbox game consoles. But that still pales in comparison to the estimated 4 million Blu-ray-equipped Sony PlayStation 3 consoles sold in the U.S."


That all said, the key thing to take from that is: "getting this format into as many hands as possible". $150M deals and cheap promises only goes so far. In the end, Warner is thinking long-term, and that is, what's going to sell the most product and make them the most money in the end. Remember, the whole purpose of both Blu-ray and HD DVD is to replace DVDs as the vehicle of choice for home movie viewing.

If anything, Michael Bay's comments regarding Microsoft wanting both formats to fail should have executives asking if there might be any truth to that, and if so, what would be the best course of action to ensure that it doesn't. It's pretty obvious what the answer to that question is: support the superior format.

I think it's interesting that Paramount/Dreamworks stated that their decision was based on cost and affordability. Quite frankly, I think that was a BS comment to defer from the $150M deal that was made, but even if it were true, does that sound like a smart business decision? C'mon, the reason anyone is in business is to make money, why would you want to sell something for little or no profit? Just doesn't make sense, especially since retailers are selling both formats (software side) for the same price. And from what I've read, in the end it's more a matter of pennies, not dollars, in the cost difference of production. I don't have the links, I've seen them out here, but take that comment with a grain of salt until someone provides one.

In the end, I still contend that it's going to be a matter of who sells more movies. Warner doesn't manufacture players, and they're not going to make the distinction between PS3 and a stand-alone player as far as how many units are in consumers' hands, it's just going to be "how many Blu-ray players are out there?" That said, and looking at it from that perspective, Blu-ray is hands down the leader in both hardware and software, and the public at large has already started to show their preference.

Here's to the best product winning!
SpikesBluBlooded you are 100% correct in my Opinion due to the fact that Warner wants to sell the D@mn disc's the more disc's it can sell of a format the better., already Warner Bros. know outside of just Movies Warner Bros. can sell more Disc's with Blu-Ray than HD DVD why. because only Blu-Ray out of the two formats is in also PC SOFTWARE, and also PLAYSTATION 3 game software Warner Bros. game studios get to sell more Software on Blu-Ray. yes they still will be selling on DVD..so people may ask what has the Software side outside of Blu-Ray movies have to do with the format war. plenty i might add.

The more disc's you sell of a format the cheaper that format will be to produce content on that format. the disc's themselves will be cheaper the more produced to be sold with content providers paying less per disc to put their content on the disc's. the faster they can do that the more $$ they can make because they do not have to pay as much per disc. and with Blu-Ray already being in multiple markets outside of Movies the BDA will be able to move more disc's which is the entire goal anyway for "CONTENT PRODUCERS"

SUCH AS Warner Bros.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:35 PM   #153
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

one thing that i get out of this article for sure, is that there was, for certain a payoff between HD DVD and Paramount/DW and it is for 18 months.

intresting sony didn't comment, only time they havn't commented in the past was in the case of a new psp and ps3 price cuts tosh certainly did seem reassuring, i'd expect something out of them like, "warner has released more titles on hd dvd, it seems to us they favor us," but nothing like that was said from them. it'll be intresting in the next few days if warner is silent about this or denys it. its still a rumor, but with recent comments from Warner in the past few months, it sure seems like they are bracing the hd dvd fanboys for something bad.

what else is good, is that business week is pretty big, so a lot of people are going to see this. and even if it is just a rumor and warner doesn't do anything, a lot of people have gotten the idea not to buy into hd dud despite cheap prices from this.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:40 PM   #154
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is online now
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

Wow, very interesting read. If I were a Toshiba/MS HD DUD-FUD boy, I'd be a bit scared in the back of my mind. I agree too about this article coming from business week is notable.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:43 PM   #155
surfdude12 surfdude12 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
surfdude12's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Club Loop
343
112
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
Right, the gap in sales increased but even with a 25% market, warner IS making money with HD DVD. I don't think they simply watch soft- and hardware sales and decide. Sure, BDA is in huge advantage (software sales, PS3+Player sales) and has a momentum, but to really convince Warner to go exclusive, they need to offer them royalties and/or money to compensate the (few) losses they will make by abandoning the red side. By the way, we need to buy more of those Harry Potter movies on blu
exactly. as much as we'd like to hope, warner cares first and foremost about making $$$$, not loyalty to one format. if they'll make more money to go blu, they will, if not, they won't. if they go exclusive, they'll have (at least temporarily) a smaller customer base until the HD-DVD fanboys smarten up and throw in the towel (which could be never as we already know).
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:46 PM   #156
Underdog Underdog is offline
Member
 
Underdog's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
49
Default

A tune keeps poping up in my head, in the rythm of Santa claus is coming to town..

Warner Bros is cooomiiiing tooo Bluuuuu!
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:49 PM   #157
Razzy Razzy is offline
Special Member
 
Razzy's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Canada
179
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Living Near Shamu View Post
If the news are true, and they are leaked out like they were, Toshiba will do anything to prevent Warner from going blu-exclusive.

Expect to hear somewhat of a 1/2 billion dollar payment.
That's why I think execs should keep quiet until it actually happens. They've opened the door a crack for the gorilla and now he can come barging it.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:50 PM   #158
Underdog Underdog is offline
Member
 
Underdog's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzy View Post
That's why I think execs should keep quiet until it actually happens. They've opened the door a crack for the gorilla and now he can come barging it.
Its just rumors...

*gives gorilla a banana with tranquilizer*
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:52 PM   #159
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzy View Post
That's why I think execs should keep quiet until it actually happens. They've opened the door a crack for the gorilla and now he can come barging it.
You don't really think that the gorillas don't already know everything going on, do you? I doubt some LGF executive saying something about it changes a thing in that regard.

What it could do is throw cold water on HD DVD sales this season. It could even be engineered for that.

Gary

P.S. Another thing to consider is, that without someone credible putting this possibility on the table, wouldn't Warner be open to a class action from new HD DVD purchasers feel betrayed that they weren't informed of this possibility?

Last edited by dialog_gvf; 12-07-2007 at 02:58 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:53 PM   #160
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfdude12 View Post
exactly. as much as we'd like to hope, warner cares first and foremost about making $$$$, not loyalty to one format. if they'll make more money to go blu, they will, if not, they won't. if they go exclusive, they'll have (at least temporarily) a smaller customer base until the HD-DVD fanboys smarten up and throw in the towel (which could be never as we already know).
warner owns both royalties in hd dvd and blu-ray disc. in order for them to make the big bucks, one of the formats they have royalties in is going to have to loss, so that mass adoption can take place. if they go hd dvd exclusive, they know they are going to kill both formats and get nothing out of their royalties, if they go blu-ray, the war is over within months (universal will go neutral), and warner can make some major dough off blu-ray. this is why they are going blu-ray exclusive, this is why a date still hasn't been set for movies like hairspray on hd dvd from their sister company, new line, and this is why billion dollar bribes are not going to influence decisions. yeah, MS offers them a billion, the get a billion now and loss out in 5 billion dollars of long term royalty and sales profit, they aren't stupid, its a bad business decision for them to go with hd dvd. anything over a billion dollars offered from MS, the shareholders will go up in arms about, so a massive, massive check isn't something to really fear.
 
Closed Thread
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Warner Rumor Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Blu-dock Saint 69 12-27-2008 01:54 PM
Rumor: LittleBigPlanet coming to the PSP PlayStation Vita and PlayStation Portable xtop 8 04-08-2008 07:08 PM
Source of $500 Million Warner Payoff Rumor Exposed Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Zotar 14 01-21-2008 06:41 PM
Warner Going Blu-ray Exclusive (Rumor) Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology SA0CD 2039 09-27-2007 05:39 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 PM.