modern warfare 2

[zoso0928]

I know i am a little late and will get flamed but is Modern Warfare 2 better for PS3 or XBOX 360? TIA

[mikejet]

The experiences are extremely similar. It's a matter of controller preference.

[JAYSONE]

I don't have an xbox, but I think the multiplayer server interface is probably more polished than the ps3 network and similar to what you would get playing on a PC.

However, you DO have to pay for Xbox live and PS3 network IS free.

I'm sure others will chime in and correct me if I'm wrong.

[Steve]

Personally I prefer the Xbox 360 version. As mikejet pointed out, it's because I like the 360 controller better than the PS3 controller.

[proxpilot]

Originally Posted by JAYSONE

However, you DO have to pay for Xbox live and PS3 network IS free.

id pay $100 a year if i had to

[supersix4]

Originally Posted by proxpilot

id pay $100 a year if i had to

When I peaked playing time with gears1 I'd have paid $200 a year to play that in its prime.

[Lord_Stewie]

I have the game for both consoles and prefer the 360 version better, mainly because of the controller.

[RiseDarthVader]

Originally Posted by JAYSONE

I don't have an xbox, but I think the multiplayer server interface is probably more polished than the ps3 network and similar to what you would get playing on a PC.

Nope all 3 versions use the same matchmaking system. None are really better then the other in this case.

[Dexter Morgan]

I prefer PS3 because I basically grew up on that controller style.

[ely.cop.rock]

As somebody already stated yes Xbox Live you have to pay for but PSN is free. I really wont buy any online games for PS3 unless have too. Never have had good experience with PSN network, always problems, always updates. And when Live is only $50 dollars a year, its really not that bad.

[lphr0z3nl]

I prefer ps3. Used to the style of controller. Always had a ps ps2 now ps3 in the family

[gatomalo]

I have the game MAG, which I only played 3 times...I have up for sale...$35...PS3

[skygreenleopard]

PS3. $50 a year for online gaming isn't bad... unless you compare it to $0.

[UK_fan_05]

It's better for 360 if you are going to be playing multiplayer.

Live has party chats that you can use in some of the gametypes, which really cancels out everyone else in the lobby except for you're friends that you play with. To me that alone is worth the few bucks a month Live cost.

$50 a year > Free in this case. You get what you pay for.

[Mr. J]

It really comes down to controller preference. For First Person Shooters, I'm a fan of the 360 controller....and I don't care what anyone says, LIVE is better than PSN (And I own both consoles)....maybe because you actually pay for it, I don't know!

[zahinn]

I just got the game few days ago...wow.
I hate the maps...I really do...I miss the dark maps from the first one. These maps are just too bright T.T

[nikita550r]

Originally Posted by zoso0928

i know i am a little late and will get flamed but is modern warfare 2 better for ps3 or xbox 360? Tia

ps3 yo all the way

[stupidducky]

agreed xD

[byronlewis]

PS concentrates on merch, and xbox is more committed to a wide variety of game sellers, thats why their games are cheaper than ps3 ones, in most cases at least. Also, if you've got an HD tv, the PS3 graphics are ten times better. Overall, PS3 is better for having a nice and easy experience, xbox is more just hardcore gaming.

[nikita550r]

i hear ya my fave game

Originally Posted by proxpilot

id pay $100 a year if i had to