|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I know bring up this very subject is almost sacrilidge, but I wanted to pick the brains of the people on this site to see what you guys think.
I have a PS3 setup wireless, and a 360 setup with an ethernet cable. My provider is Comcast-high speed broadband. Now, I don't buy a ton of movies, but I rent quite a bit. There is an awesome independent movie rental place I go to called Scarecrow Video, about a 15 minute drive. On Wednesdays they have rent 1 new release, rent an old release for the same price for a total of $4.50. Both can be blu-ray. There is also a Blockbuster close to me, and they have a similar program M-TH, but it's like ~$6 and it can be a new blu-ray, but usually has to be a non-blu-ray on the older catalogue-and they seem pretty inconsistent with this policy. The PS3 has been fairly disappointing on this front. Despite having a larger catalogue, the price is terrible at like $6.00 + tax, and the downloading and buffering is a nightmare, and takes forever, and has killed the mood for me a couple of times. The new "Instant 1080p-Zune HD, XBL", is better in terms of speed. I watched Outlander the other night because it was too late to rent, and I get sick of watching all of the same stuff over and over again. It was pretty impressive-picture quality was not bad. The sound was surprisingly robust. There is an opening spaceship crash scene that was loud as hell, 50-it sounded close to 65 on my receiver. A couple of questions. Does anyone know any hard facts on bit-rates that you get on any of these methods? For audio and for video. Also, for sound-would it be a stretch to say that a blu-ray audio codec sounds more quiet than a streamed source, because it is more accurate, or has not had the decibel level screwed with, or we're just hearing more noise-so it appears louder? You would think that since they're offering an inferior product, that the rental prices would match, or there would be deals more often of some kind. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|