|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $29.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.50 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]()
Does the new Sony Bravia X-series 1080P tv's use the wobulation technique?
Does it actually have 2 million plus pixels, natively? Is it acually full 1080 P, without bullsh*t? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Aug 2004
Seaattle
|
![]()
Wobulation is only in DLP sets. The Bravia is LCD so you're talking about full pixels here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
May 2006
|
![]()
did they say what size's theyre launching the X-Series in?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Feb 2006
|
![]()
The X-Series in Japan (40" and 46") launched in November, 2005. Based on the specs on the Sony Japan site, it is only 1080i.
Since there wasn't much sign of it coming to the US anytime soon, I ended up getting the 40" V Series instead. For me, it wasn't a 720p vs. 1080i decision. The 46" option for the 1080i is what I was interested in. Honestly, I have not looked around since, so I could be wrong about the US one, if they did announce it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I heard that there are certain patterns that the wobulation cannot recreate - can anyone confirm this as fact?
Of course it may be only pertinent to people who like to watch patterns ... though it could also affect the rendering of details like fabric in real video.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Can someone explain exactly what "wobulation" is?
I've seen an effect on DLP 1080p sets that's somewhat similar to that of interlacing. While interlacing creates the appearance of everyother scan line being black while following motion up or down the screen, this appears as ever other pixel being black in a checkerboard pattern, and is visible with movement in various directions. Is this what "wobulation" is, or is it an effect of "wobulation"? I have seen this same effect on a direct view LCD 1080p set from Westinghouse. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Expert Member
Jan 2005
Makati, Philippines
|
![]()
I've read from the thread at AVS forums and yes, they are going to release the Bravia X series and the next-gen V series overseas.
Second-gen V series: KDL-32V2000 KDL-40V2000 KDL-46V2000 Then here's the upcoming model number(s) for the X series for US/Canada peeps: KDL-40XBR2 KDL-46XBR2 KDL-52XBR2 For the second generation BRAVIA models: X series = 1080p panel, full max resolution of 1080 p native V series = 1080p panel, native resolution is only 1080 interlaced but is "1080 p ready" S series = 1080 i max res. no WCG-CCFL backlighting. Compared to the first gen models, all second-gen models use "BRAVIA engine." |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]()
The Bravia X-series tv that I was talking about is the Sony BRAVIA KDL-46X2000, available in Europe since May 2006. It is about 5000 euro's. It is 46", not that I will buy a 46" tv, I want to buy a tv from this X-series, but a 26" version when it comes out.
Last edited by mainman; 06-01-2006 at 12:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]() Quote:
But panel with native resolution which is only 1080 interlaced but is "1080 p ready", what does that mean, that it is 960-1080 or something? What is exactly the difference between these two? A TV with 1300:1 contrast, is this good. 8ms responsetime, what is the lowest response time ever on a (LCD)TV? Thanks Last edited by mainman; 06-01-2006 at 12:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Sep 2005
|
![]() Quote:
For 1080i the " i " means that there are two interlaced fields to make up the full frame. There the first field in the frame does line one, three, five, seven, etc. ending with line 1079. Then it starts over with the second field at two, four, six, eight, etc. ending with line 1080. Thus it takes two fields to make up the full image (or frame). For 1080p the " p " means that the etire frame is created out of a progressive scan. This means it goes through lines one then two then three then four then five, etc. never skipping any lines in the process. I've mentioned elsewhere in these boards my opinion on p versus i. I won't repeat it here. There has been an on going debate as to what the minimum contrast ratio is to be acceptable to most people. Similar to the p versus i issue, acceptable contrast ratio comes down to what you are watching (certainly watching "Sin City" requires a different contrast ratio to be tollerable to view than watching reruns of "M*A*S*H") and the lighting of the room in which you have the set (a brighter room may need higher a contrast ratio than a dimmer room for some people's taste). That said, a contrast ratio of 1300:1 for a LCD would not be considered bad by many people, but compare that with a plasma display which might have a contrast ratio of better than 3,000:1. The best thing is to just view it yourself with pictures you might watch and in lighting conditions you will probably have. With regard to response time, I've also gone into that in gory detail in other places in this board. Suffice it to say there is no such thing as "lowest response time ever" as there is no standard as to how to measure response time. Every manufacturer choses its own way of giving the number. Some give response times as the time to switch from full on to full off. Other manufacturers give a "gray-to-gray" response time (which could be going from a 200 to 201 gray level [assuming the full range of 0-255]) which would give a very different full on to full off number. The fastest I've heard/read for full on to full off is 12 milliseconds and the fastest gray-to-gray is/was 1 millisecond, but the two are not directly comparable as turning on and off pixels is not a linear function. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]()
Ok, I understand what you are trying to say, but one question keeps coming up in my head.
A 1080i TV which is 1080p ready and A 1080p native TV. What is exactly the difference between the two? Does the 1080i tv reproduce an 'artificial' 1080p screen or something? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
May 2006
|
![]()
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...031421-8858035
The KDL-32V2000 KDL-40V2000 KDL-46V2000 All have 1366 x 768 resolutions So obviously it does not have true 1080p I only found a few sites that said 480p\480i 720p 1080i compatible I don’t know does this thing have a 1080p up converter is that what they\you mean by: ""V series = 1080p panel, native resolution is only 1080 interlaced but is "1080 p ready" |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Active Member
Sep 2004
toronto
|
![]()
http://www.hardwarezone.com/news/view.php?id=4669&cid=6
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]()
Damn man, I am looking for a 26" 1080p, and from the looks of it (the artikle above), the first 26" 1080p will appear in early 2007 at the nearest (from Sony at least).
I just cant wait anymore, but I have to, damn. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Jan 2005
|
![]()
What are you viewing from... 3 feet?
A 1080p 40" display should be viewed from about 5 feet! There are very few circumstances and environments which are setup properly where 1080p can be fully realized for the fully quality and potential it has. Mostly it is environments with televisions exceeding 50" and viewing distances following close to THX standards. FYI: The KDL-46V2000 is listed as a 1366x768 LCD, not a 1920x1080 panel. I am not sure what resolutions it accepts, but it is not 1080p. It is 'HD ready' which means it has no internal HD tuner. No big deal, but if you are looking for 1080p, then it seems like that series may not be for you in the first place. I would go with the 40" Westinghouse... or do the new Sharp models (37") also have 1080p support? 26" simply is rather silly if it isn't in your car. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Jan 2006
|
![]()
"A 1080p 40" display should be viewed from about 5 feet."
That is the best way to view such a screen, but it doesn't say what kind of (unhealthy) effect it could have on the eyes, it only says that it is the best way to view from that distance. My viewing distance is 2.5 meters maybe less, that should be around 8 feet, but I just don’t feel comfortable buying a bigger tv than 26" for this length, 32" is also acceptable, but I rather have 26". I am following my gut feeling about this one, and not what is commonly accepted. And it happens a lot, that 1 day it is healthy to do something, and then some university proves that it is unhealthy to do this same thing. Last edited by mainman; 06-04-2006 at 11:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Jan 2005
|
![]()
Actually, universities have just shown that viewing TV to close has no effect on the human eye. Either way, you aren't viewing to close, you are viewing from the same distance either way. 2.5 meters with a 10 inch screen is 2.5 meters. 2.5 meters with a 10 foot screen is 2.5 meters. The proper viewing distance, as determined by ANSI and THX is a good way to make your decisions. At 2.5 meters you should actually be viewing a screen that is about 60 inches WIDE! 40" diagonal is well under the normal viewing size for your distance. This is obviously your choice, but if a professional were to come in and recommend a screen for you, at your viewing distance the number would NOT be 27" - but would likely be 50" - or more.
I recently installed a 42" plasma for someone viewing at about the same distance... Their first comment was 'WOW! That's big.' A week later I finished the installation and they commented on how suprised they were at how that size now seemed just right... perhaps they could have gone even larger. If you feel that 40" is to big - you are wrong. Ideal size is larger than 40" and I would follow pro guidelines over my 'gut' any day of the week. I don't go with my 'gut' when I fill out my taxes - I let the pros do it. Likewise, it makes sense to follow the advice of pros when deciding on a home theater purchase. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Ready to buy a Sony Bravia W-Series KDL-52W4100 52-Inch 1080p 120Hz LCD | LCD TVs | jw | 18 | 06-09-2009 02:26 AM |
Sony Bravia Z-Series Leaning Forward? Normal? | LCD TVs | Della | 7 | 05-30-2009 11:23 PM |
Sony Bravia W4000-Series LCD TV in Europe | LCD TVs | McBain | 5 | 06-16-2008 04:05 AM |
Sony Bravia 1080i or Samsung 1080P - Need Help | Display Theory and Discussion | Brummydude | 26 | 03-11-2008 05:54 PM |
|
|