|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $13.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.50 1 hr ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Here's a great movie that just opened in theaters, and I'm confused as to whether I'll be able to pick it up on Blu-ray later down the road. In the US, the film is distributed theatrically by Miramax, which is of course a branch of Buena Vista aka Disney, and the film is produced by both Paramount Vantage and Miramax. Anyone have a clue as to where this movie will end up, as far as HDM?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Member
Sep 2007
Grants Pass, OR
|
![]()
Both, but in the US BD exclusive. IMDB is your friend.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477348/companycredits |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
It's coming in February?!? That seems really early. Not that I'm complaining. I really want to see it again, I think I would like it a lot better the second time around, considering I had just got done watching The Big Lebowski, so I was expecting a little more comical side of the Coens....a la Fargo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Expert Member
May 2007
|
![]()
I see that boxofficemojo.com says that this doesn't come out in Germany until April 10, 2008. If Disney has the disc rights in the US and Paramount overseas, I think it would be rather amusing if Disney would release it region free on Blu-ray in the US before it comes out in theaters in Germany. If Paramount complained, they could always point out that Paramount is working to try to kill the next gen format which allows the studios to use region encoding (and has taken money to do so), so they really don't have much of a leg to stand on. Of course, contracts may preclude the above, but Disney could still use this movie as an example of why they disagree with Paramount trying to keep Disney (or any other studio) from even having the option to use region encoding.
--Darin Last edited by darinp2; 11-24-2007 at 08:09 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
|
![]()
This will be released from Disney exclusively on 02/26/08.
http://www.hidefpreview.com/HD%20Rumors.html ~Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
holy s*** %&#@(!&#@%@%!(#%#%#3@(8!)2947*=_-=`
![]() how much truth is there to that rumored release schedule? that is amazing. count of monte cristo, o brother, no country, finding nemo, unbreakable etc etc. holy crap. i'm going to be more broke next year if all that pans out. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Also, I loved this movie. It was just so brutal, and I loved it having no soundtrack. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Haneke He does not add any music to a film unless it is actually being played in the movie. They have a weird feel to them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Special Member
|
![]()
It has a soundtrack, albeit a very minimal one, by the Coens' old collaborator, Carter Burwell.
This is very different from oodles of European arthouse titles having no score, which in itself comes from a misplaced notion that film scoring somehow equals unearned pathos. If you go to a prestigious festival and sit through four or five such titles a day, your ears pop the first time a scored film comes along. Sometimes the no-score approach works. But I still find it vastly inferior to intelligent spotting of the score, and tailoring the music subtly to the needs of the film. One recent example: As anyone who has heard the typewriter rhythms in the score to Atonement (a Universal title, yes, unfortunately) can attest, there are many ways in which scoring can enhance the most serious drama. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
I was looking to this film a lot, and while i enjoyed it, it certainly fell short of what it could be. After hearing about the "pure evil" that Antoine Chigurh was... eh. There were just too many things that fell short, or felt out of place to make this a good movie. Last edited by ascian; 11-25-2007 at 05:49 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Banned
Nov 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Active Member
Oct 2006
Atlanta, GA
|
![]()
Um, he did say:
Quote:
The Coen Brothers are not Hollywood mainstream wannabes, and their films are not likely to garner the kind of universal audience acceptance that lesser efforts might aim for. Don't expect to see Jerry Bruckheimer when watching a Coen Brothers picture. I thought "No Country" was a fantastic film. Perhaps not everybody will consider this a great film. But to suggest that it's not even "good" seems off base. It's at least a lot better than most of the swill that makes it to the big screen these days. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Well with a movie like this, explaining stuff without giving too much away is like your boss doing telling you to do a job quickly and thoroughly. Next time I'll post a spoiler warning or something.
![]() I understand what you mean about the Coen brothers and as far as their...style... I know what to expect. I saw the film with my brother and dad over the holiday weekend and even (correctly) warned my dad that it might not fit his tastes.I did enjoy the film, I like most of their others and The Big Lebowski is definitely up there in my top films. But I digress. Without meaning to be argumentative, my thoughts were merely that it lacked cohesiveness and depth. In my mind these are two pretty important things to make a film better than good, or even worth watching a second time. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|