|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $33.49 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $11.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $70.00 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I'm a new convert to 4K/UHD, and I only own about 10 discs on UHD so far. I've been following the disc reviews and it seems like fair amount of 4K discs are actually being scored LOWER in Video Quality than their 1080 counterparts. Some recent examples: The Shape of Water, Thor: Ragnarok, Hell or High Water, It, pretty much all the Harry Potter films, Coco, and the list goes on. What is the benchmark for these reviews? What standards are being applied to the 4K image in comparison to the 1080 image? Is the picture genuinely WORSE in 4K than the 1080 presentation, or is it a subjective analysis based on what the reviewer THINKS the 4K presentation should look like? Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
4k reviews, 4k uhd, reviewers, reviews, uhd |
|
|