|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $10.99 3 hrs ago
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
Does anyone else think that there are non-nominated performances that were actually better than Oscar-nominated or -winning ones in the same movie?
For instance, I watched Ben-Hur expecting a tour de force by Best Supporting Actor winner Hugh Griffith, only to find out that Jack Hawkins was the more memorable presence, playing an actual human being with a surprisingly affecting character arc instead of his fellow cast member's broad caricature. In fact, I was so unimpressed by Griffith's turn and, conversely, so taken with Hawkins' performance that I second-guessed myself, thinking that I must have confused one with the other. ![]() Last edited by Cremildo; 08-25-2019 at 07:43 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
academy awards, acting, oscars, performance |
|
|