|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $9.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $9.99 | ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $9.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.99 | ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I imagine that this is still a somewhat case-by-case basis, but does iTunes (and other similar digital services) usually have better PQ than DVD for standard definition content?
The reason I ask is that for 1080p and 4K, the streaming usually have significantly lower specs compared to disc, but I would think that the lower bandwidth to match or exceed SD DVD specs would come into play. BTW, I’m particularly interested in stuff that’s not out anywhere in HD and likely never will be. For example cartoons & TV shows mastered on video tapes, and older documentaries shot on SD video, etc. Any related thoughts welcome and appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
SD content on streaming tends to look like utter dogshit when compared to the DVD versions. For one, streaming providers always convert interlaced content to progressive output modes. Most of the time they severely botch the deinterlacing so bad, that you would easily notice jagged edges and scanlined/field blended frames.
Second, they compress the hell out of them more than the DVD MPEG-2 counterparts. A 1990s 16:9 movie on DVD that is MPEG-2 would be roughly 3-7gbs in overall size. On streaming, the SD version of that same movie would clock in at 600mbs-1.2gbs in size. Even though the stream would be using H264 (which is more advanced and efficient than MPEG-2), they would set the H264 perimeters at such low settings that PQ can noticeably suffer on top of whatever botched deinterlacing job was done. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Streams vary by provider and source, but in my experience the DVDs of Star Trek DS9 and VOY and of Babylon 5 looked much better than the streaming options at the time I was watching them.
On the other hand I've also occasionally seen some really shoddy DVDs too. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | cicada88 (02-07-2021), ps3bd_owner (02-07-2021) |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
In very rare cases, a SD streaming version can be superior to the DVD equivalent. I recall seeing a comparison with some British/Australian show where the only DVD release of it from the US not only heavily compressed 15 episodes on a DVD5, but had a completely ****ed up frame rate as well (23.976 soft pulldown made from a 29.97i field blended conversion from 25fps/50i native frame rate). The US streaming version of that same British/Australian show ran the proper 25/50fps rate on most providers. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | cicada88 (02-07-2021), ps3bd_owner (02-07-2021) |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
Jan 2021
|
![]()
It depends on how the provider/distributor encoded the program and the frame rate it was produced in. In my personal experience, I bought some Disney Channel Original Movies and shows from iTunes solely because they didn't get released officially on DVD, for most of them, the image quality looked about as good as if it were to get an official DVD release, but for a few other titles there were noticeable compression artifacts that made it look worse than what you'd expect out of a DVD, so much so to the point where even a good HDTV rip had less compression. For example: the first Zenon movie had some noticeable color banding in its iTunes version.
As someone already briefly mentioned, digital services do change the frame rate on interlaced content, in my case these older (SD mastered) TV movies were IVTC'd (converted from 29.97i to 23.976p), so scenes that were fast motion when these movies previously aired on TV didn't feel quite the same as they used to (you can easily spot this change in scrolling end credits). There was also noticeable deinterlacing in a few of these movies as there were jagged edges. Another compromise that might be bothersome is the way the audio is compressed. More often than not, digital services (including streaming and purchases) use AAC compression at 128kbps for Stereo sound, whereas DVDs typically use AC3 compression at 192-256kbps for Stereo (384-448kbps is more commonly used for Surround sound than it is for Stereo). I've also noticed that the audio sample rate of most of my iTunes movie purchases was 44.1KHz (CD sample rate) rather than the 48KHz sample rate that DVDs commonly use. Last edited by KPackratt2k; 02-07-2021 at 08:52 AM. Reason: Added more information |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | cicada88 (02-07-2021) |
![]() |
#7 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
![]() Apr 2011
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Granted, that’s streaming, but I can’t believe how bad it looked compared to the DVDs (which aren’t anything to write home about to begin with) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
![]() Apr 2011
|
![]() Quote:
I know why they don't do that though I can't see myself buying and knowing it can disappear from my account, or my account might somehow be banned or what have you for whatever reason. iTunes music files are DRM-free so I can download and listen to them anywhere I want. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
As was already mentioned, lot of SD-only content from the 80s and early 90s is sourced from analog video, which brings a lot of inherent problems (such as deinterlacing) with it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
Screen size Seating distance Gear quality Picture and sound settings/calibration Eye and ear quality |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
I only really care about the first 10 or so seasons which are all definitely from analog videotape masters, and I would guess face deinterlacing issues. Still, I would expect Disney to be able to use the best deinterlacing algorithm combined with uncompressed digitized masters, they could easily beat out the original DVD. Instead, they did a sloppy heavy DNR job from what I saw. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Well, it's based on all the above factors and after spending days comparing before I had to make my mind to go the digital route.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Fox did messy, DNR'd HD upconverts of the first 19 seasons, and were all cropped to widescreen for FX broadcasts and used on most streaming providers. The first 5 seasons in HD look the worst due to being upconverted and DNR'd from composite masters, sporting dot crawl and rainbow artifacts all over the place. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#20 |
Special Member
![]() Nov 2019
|
![]()
If I have a choice between renting the SD streaming version or importing a foreign DVD, which option is better.
What about renting HD streaming upscaled from SD vs buying DVD? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|