|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $10.99 4 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Sep 2020
-
-
-
|
![]()
Why hasn't the MPA(A) sued them for daring to release home video without on-screen FBI warnings? What other U.S. companies dare to do this? Actually, since most others do have the warnings, this must mean Criterion's titles are exempt from FBI prosecution for copyright violationists?
![]() What if a person exclusively bought Criterion titles and never saw such a warning in their life? Would they be forced to read the copyright warning on the artwork? Then why isn't that warning enough for other companies? Such a complex issue. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
annoyance, criterion, fbi, piracy, warnings |
|
|