|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $33.49 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $11.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $54.49 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
![]() Feb 2008
|
![]()
Bluray specs says it can do upto 50Mbs bitrate. Is this limit due to storage space or is it due to the capabilities of the decoders?
Second. Can bluray do 1440p (hdmi 1.3a) in it's current state if the 100 and 200 gigs discs come out? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
|
![]()
The reason that the movies never get up to bitrates that high is because of all the extras and different language audio channels everyone wants. What people don't realize is that if there were less extras-the movie could be a higher quality.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | i95 (03-05-2021) |
![]() |
#3 |
Special Member
Jun 2007
|
![]()
Totally agree. This is a very important point and something that people really need to be educated on.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Nov 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Samurai
May 2007
Indianapolis
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
I hate that. Wish they got rid of it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Power Member
Mar 2005
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
I think LCD will be 1440p soon, just have in mind these tv's would output true 1080p motion res...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blu-ray Guru
Nov 2007
Reno, NEVADA. "Battle Born"
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by ThePhantomOak; 06-29-2008 at 11:25 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Jan 2008
|
![]()
I would rather have the extras then the marginal difference you are referring to.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Power Member
|
![]()
What with all the talk on here about 1440P, I was just sitting back a while ago thinking about 1080 (I/P) and what was being proposed a few years ago as far as HDTV was concerned.
Japan proposed the Hi-Vision system which was 1125 lines, and broadcast this using an analogue compression system called MUSE. So this system had an additional 45 lines of resolution. They even launched a LaserDisc system onto the market using this format. Europe proposed the HD-MAC system (which never took off) and this was a 1250 line system (twice PAL). So this system had an additional 170 lines of resolution. Both used a similar aspect ratio, though I believe Hi-Vision was actually 5:3. I wonder what made the world plump for 1080 lines??? |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Special Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Blu-ray Maximum Bitrate Question... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | emm7th | 19 | 12-30-2017 03:57 AM |
Tristan & Isolde Blu-ray (High Bitrate VC-1!) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Nooff | 18 | 09-08-2011 09:52 AM |
Will we see 1440p or 1600p Blu-Ray? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Jacobisthe | 16 | 01-03-2009 03:50 PM |
Minimum Bitrate for Blu-Ray Spec'd Disk Authoring | Home Theater General Discussion | Simon00 | 0 | 12-22-2008 10:54 AM |
200 GB Blu-Ray disks=1440p? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | me_inside | 5 | 12-05-2007 10:51 AM |
|
|