As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
14 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
6 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Wallace & Gromit: The Complete Cracking Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$13.99
8 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
1 hr ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
A History of Violence 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2007, 05:27 PM   #1
AlexKx AlexKx is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2005
Default Playful.com practically declares format war over.

I REALLY don't get how anyone could choose H.D.-D.V.D. over Blu-Ray under ANY circumstances unless they have just been lied to over and over. Here is www.playfuls.com basically declaring an end to the format war with H.D.-D.V.D. winning because they were out first and cost less and now this dual player thing is the trump card for them. It's like NOTHING is going for Blu-Ray but how can that even be when it is the SUPERIOR format?! For God sakes the whole reason I am really interested in an upgrade ANWAY is that Blu-Ray would hold more film on it BY FAR! Otherwise why the hell else go for an upgrade?! That's what's driving me NUTS!! It's like those who are hard to convince an upgrade at all ARE right if H.D.-D.V.D. wins...what's the point?!

Last edited by AlexKx; 01-05-2007 at 05:28 PM. Reason: Title address needs changing too but I can't for some reason!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 05:33 PM   #2
AlexKx AlexKx is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2005
Default Here is the actual web addres...

Actually this is the web address...
http://www.playfuls.com/news_05707_D...HD_Player.html
It came from the news section on the www.Google.com webpage. I did not know how to find the article otherwise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 06:12 PM   #3
phranctoast phranctoast is offline
Power Member
 
phranctoast's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
Long Island, NY;psn:phranctoast
78
Default

I find it comical that anyone can really believe HD DVD will win the format war. Most people arent stupid. When they see that 95% of the movies they want to watch are on Blu ray they will buy that. Blu ray should make the stand alone players comparable in price though.
If i had any say in the BDA id make sure they never used VC-1 however. I would not want to give a dime to MS just because they fealt the need to muddy up the waters because they released an inferior product.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 08:00 PM   #4
iceman iceman is offline
Developer
 
iceman's Avatar
 
May 2003
13
27
121
26
1
6
10
2
3
1
Default

Look how they repeatedly spell Blu-ray, "Blu Ray", pretty much says it all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 09:01 PM   #5
dobyblue dobyblue is offline
Super Moderator
 
dobyblue's Avatar
 
Jul 2006
Ontario, Canada
71
55
655
15
Default

It's incredible how ignorant some online sites can be.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 09:04 PM   #6
Knight-Errant Knight-Errant is offline
Power Member
 
Knight-Errant's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Sheffield, UK
Default

I really believe someone is paying for these sites to spill BS "reports" of the format war.

I mean its just NOT reality
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 09:16 PM   #7
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight-Errant View Post
I really believe someone is paying for these sites to spill BS "reports" of the format war.

I mean its just NOT reality
Gee, I wonder who that "someone" could be?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 09:22 PM   #8
AlexKx AlexKx is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2005
Default

I have read YET another article...this one
http://www.newsfactor.com/news/DVD-F...d=0110014KRW0I
where the first line is WRONG! Therefore the rest of it is too. This is NOT just an issue of improved audio and visual quality! It is because Blu-Ray can hold LOADS more than H.D.-D.V.D. At this point I have come to the conclusion that these articles will be the downfall of Blu-Ray because one they are wrong and do not acknowledge why I said it is better than H.D.-D.V.D. (and let me make this VERY clear there are VERY few articles that have pointed out my point how Blu-Ray is better and those that have just go on to claim how that isn't what people are interested in) and two because Sony or whoever would like to sell Blu-Ray products in NO WAY from what I can tell force these people to let their reader's know that they were either wrong or at least in some way or form tell them of what the facts really are. That's all I can say. All I see in reality are the masses (the public throughout the world) just follow along blindly with anything. In every aspect of life. I am so sick of it. Whatever the facts are if you can't convince the public of them or at least educate them as to what they are...then you loose. Simple as that.

Last edited by AlexKx; 01-05-2007 at 09:25 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 10:31 PM   #9
thunderhawk thunderhawk is offline
Moderator
 
thunderhawk's Avatar
 
Jul 2004
Belgium
Default

This is not about stupid people, this is about bad advertisement. The people should know how to spell Blu-ray by now.

Most of those sites look at how much of the internet community supports BD and how much BD. If you see all the FUD and fanboying... People don't see further then that, when you're not really involved or actually getting to the bottom of this...
It's all about PR when it comes to the spreading of information! And imo the BDA is shortcoming when compared to the HDDVDPRG, BD should've had a larger user base if you just look at the enormous list of supporting companies...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 12:50 AM   #10
AlexKx AlexKx is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2005
Default

So where do you think it will go from here Thunderhawk?
And what do you mean that "Blu-Ray is only the beginning"?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 02:06 AM   #11
dantruon dantruon is offline
Junior Member
 
Nov 2006
Default

The format war as I can see it right now will ultimately decided by the sales of the Playstation 3, if the PS3 sells as much as the ps2 ( it will once production issues are sought out and the damm thing get release in PAL territory.) then this will put alot of pressure on movies studios such as Universal who only release movies in HDDVD to also release their movies on Blu-ray since if they dont they will loose a potential market of 100 millions if not more by the end of the console cylce. Thus, the format war was always decided by the ps3's success or in that case failure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 03:26 AM   #12
pretender2j pretender2j is offline
Member
 
Nov 2006
Default

One thing that annoys me more than anything is people who are supposed to know what they are talking about (playfuls.com is meant to be a Gaming\Science\Technology news website) and yet they employ reporters who think just cause they spend some time reading about a topic they know everthing there is to know about said topic.

- "Game industry insiders have criticized since the beginning Sony’s stubbornness to include the Blu Ray drive in PS3, thus increasing the overall price of the console to $600. By comparison, Microsoft offers customers the option of adding an HD DVD external drive to the Xbox 360, for only $200, making the device the cheapest HD DVD player on the market."

It's a joke that people keep bringing up the $200 HD-DVD player that you can get in(for) the XBOX 360. Sure over 9.5 million people have an XBOX 360 and those people can go out and get a $200 HD-DVD player. For the rest of us who don't have one it's still a 'normal' price $500-600 HD-DVD player.

JB
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 03:55 AM   #13
GaS GaS is offline
Senior Member
 
Aug 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pretender2j View Post
One thing that annoys me more than anything is people who are supposed to know what they are talking about (playfuls.com is meant to be a Gaming\Science\Technology news website) and yet they employ reporters who think just cause they spend some time reading about a topic they know everthing there is to know about said topic.

- "Game industry insiders have criticized since the beginning Sony’s stubbornness to include the Blu Ray drive in PS3, thus increasing the overall price of the console to $600. By comparison, Microsoft offers customers the option of adding an HD DVD external drive to the Xbox 360, for only $200, making the device the cheapest HD DVD player on the market."

It's a joke that people keep bringing up the $200 HD-DVD player that you can get in(for) the XBOX 360. Sure over 9.5 million people have an XBOX 360 and those people can go out and get a $200 HD-DVD player. For the rest of us who don't have one it's still a 'normal' price $500-600 HD-DVD player.

JB
Yeah, the cheapest hd-dvd device on the market with no hdmi, no TrueHD, no DTS-MA, no lossless pcm. Not much of a bargain if you ask me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 04:53 AM   #14
jorg jorg is offline
Power Member
 
jorg's Avatar
 
Dec 2006
Ontario, Canada
2
Send a message via MSN to jorg
Default

don't forget you need a 360 to even using it bring total realy cost to 600$ at elst
399 or 400 for core 360 seystem
199 or 200 for add on
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 07:28 AM   #15
nobody nobody is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2007
Default

i've been to Best Buy and there ain't any real big difference in price between Hd-dvd and Blu-Ray. If you find Hd-Dvd for cheap on eBay or something like that...it must be because the seller just want to get rid of it at any cost. The PS3 blows away the the competition in every aspect. Variety of games are scarce because it's a new console, there still in development. I own a PS3 and I like it alot! I used to own the original xBox and I like it too. But the specs are just off the hook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 04:05 PM   #16
kefer kefer is offline
Junior Member
 
Dec 2006
Default

I don't believe anyone knows what will win yet. The assumption that blu-ray will win simply because it is the SUPERIOR format is wrong. Beta was clearly superior to VHS, but so-what? Sony screwed up with that format (and a few others along the way), and they lost the format war even though they had the superior technology.

That said, I actually believe they will probably win this one. Yes HD-DVD has been out longer and is cheaper, but the fact is they are both expensive and relatively few units have sold in either format. So blu-ray isn't really that far behind - and as both technologies get cheaper and more popular, blu-ray will probably win out due to it's superior technology and studio support.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:29 PM   #17
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7041
4040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kefer View Post
Beta was clearly superior to VHS, but so-what? Sony screwed up with that format (and a few others along the way), and they lost the format war even though they had the superior technology.
That's actually a myth. As I and others have said who were there, Beta I (one hour tape format) was superior but you couldnt fit a movie on it. By the time you had Beta AND Super Beta (remember that?) at tape speeds where you could fit movies on them and with Hi Fi stereo sound, VHS/VHS Hi Fi was about equal or better and Super-VHS trounced it. I think the difference between them was about 5% on spec, (like the difference between a 20" TV and a 21" TV) which would be wiped out by variances of VCR unit tolerances.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:38 PM   #18
kefer kefer is offline
Junior Member
 
Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
That's actually a myth.
I was there too, and I owned both formats (as a matter of fact, I STILL have a functioning Beta player!). I agree the difference was not huge, but Beta was noticeably better to my eye. I also remember that most semi-professional video cameras in the mid to late 70's were Beta, not VHS. But ultimately it didn't matter - Sony lost the format war not based on their technology, but on their marketing, which was the point I was trying to make.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:47 PM   #19
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7041
4040
Default

ok

Out of curiosity, if you record something now (a DVD will do fine) in your Beta deck in Beta II (is it a Hi Fi one? Has to be for the test) and you record the DVD in VHS SP, how do they compare?



Edit: oh I just reread and you say you have a player. well so far for the test. never mind

Last edited by Deciazulado; 01-06-2007 at 10:50 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Is Toshiba fighting a personal war, and not a format war? General Chat tron3 25 02-06-2008 01:05 PM
Lionsgate Declares 'War' on Blu-ray Blu-ray Movies - North America Iron Man 9 10-09-2007 08:11 PM
Format War Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology scott87 16 06-13-2007 01:02 PM
Sony Declares War Over--Blu-Ray Wins Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology d0uble0se7en 42 02-07-2007 09:45 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 AM.