|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.50 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
Jan 2007
|
![]()
A tale of two viewpoints....
From a poster in Blu-ray.com: "I am wondering if studios aren't "rushing" the conversion process in order to get out as many discs for their particular formats as quckly as possible. Many people, as is well know(n), believe that the format which can offer the most content will be the eventual winner. I know a bit about processing...having spent...4 years editing on AVID Media Composers...I do know that great pains are taken to "clean up images" when transferred from film to standard DVDs. I have seen excuses stating that "you'll get more grain because it's such a high resolution", etc., but I know better. "I'm not talking about just Bluray or HDDVD here...I'm curious...do you guys get the feeling we're being short-changed on quality just so they can release more titles quickly?" On the other side of town... This from a poster at High Def Forum: "Disney - Number of animated classics released or announced for Blu-Ray(?) Zero. Sony - Blu-Ray is your format and you have the most to (lose) if it fails. So why with the catalog you have are you releasing so few titles(?)...Where is Spider-Man(?) I want Spider-Man now." Replies to his post: "Some questions that I'm sure all of us would love answered." "That sounds like those questions are on the mind of many BD supporters, and also on the minds of HD-DVD supporters as well. Sony has the most to lose, and they could have squashed HD-DVD if they had done things right." "Sony is just being overconfident, I think. However, they might release a lot more if they see the ship is starting to sink." These contrasting viewpoints, which are a microcosm of attitudes among hi-def videophiles, spell out perhaps the most important dilemma facing studios that have become financially committed to hi-def DVD. Home Theater enthusiasts clamor for the highest display and audio quality possible, while demanding that studios quickly release a flood of top-of-the-line titles for a technology that has barely entered its infancy. Compounding the difficulties for studios and hardware manufacturers -- 1) How much money do you invest in transfer quality for a movie that is of unknown consumer demand? 2) How much short-term, long-term return on your investment might be expected for a technology that barely registers on the financial radar screen? 3) How much chance is there that the format you support may fail before your investment is recouped? 4) If you release too many 'A' titles, will the hoped-for early-release revenues of 'B' tltles suffer? 5) Will too many 'B'-quality movies, with their inherently poor images, saddle hi-def with a tarnished image in consumers' minds? 6) Will the increased availability and competitive pricing of PPV hi-def movies outweigh disc's potential advantages? 7) Will new transfer processes, and the players that will display them, dampen potential sales if first-rate movies are released too early in the marketplace? These questions are most likely only a fraction of those that studios and hardware companies must consider as they pay heed to the bottom line. It is one thing for all of us in these forums to question studios' commitment to our own personal demands, it is quite another to be at the helm of a company that could lose untold millions of dollars by giving in to untested speculative analysis as regards the mass marketplace. In light of the above, it seems to me that the only proper course for hi-def enthusiasts such as ourselves to follow is to enjoy the releases that studios elect to give us, and to honestly critique the merits of their work. And just let it go at that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Active Member
Oct 2006
Wisconsin
|
![]()
Dont' Spider-Man, Cars, Pirates of the Carribean have release dates now? I believe they are done with the "B" movies, as you pointed out, and are now bringing the A-game.
Also, there was an interview with a Sony official on AVS forum, they are taking their time and doing a better job on transfers than some of the first titles, so it seems they are going the route of more time and money for better transfers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Blu-ray Knight
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Power Member
Mar 2005
|
![]()
cleaning up frame by frame does not result in grain
just look at the new james bond movies that came out they are superb only wish they would come out in BD |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Would High Def been better off if HD-DVD would have won? | General Chat | thomasward00 | 83 | 01-18-2009 05:11 PM |
HOW TO: Make a High-Def DVD with Toast 9 | Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software | CptGreedle | 11 | 05-23-2008 09:54 PM |
High Def Digest favors HD DVD? | General Chat | Quinthoopachiefy | 9 | 09-23-2007 01:01 AM |
DVD Empire High Def Blog | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | ClaytonMG | 5 | 06-04-2007 08:30 PM |
Who Is Drawing Out The High-Def DVD Stalemate? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | coolmilo | 13 | 04-13-2007 08:45 AM |
|
|