|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $33.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $74.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.00 1 hr ago
| ![]() $42.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $54.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
well people i have yet another question to ask you guys.
well i wanted to know if a pair of klipsch 82's would be enough power to handle the bass in a 2.0 sytem with out having to purchase a seperate subwoofer? i am a little tight in my budget right now so for the mean while i will have to stick to a 2.0 system. by the way my living room size is 13x16. eventually i will purchase my center and a pair of rf-52's for my soround to complete my 5.1 system. Last edited by TENSE; 09-05-2008 at 05:34 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Member
|
![]()
if its not in your budget right now don't worry about the subwoofer. I have the RF-35s (the old model of the 82s) and I often listen to music without the sub. Basically just stick with the towers in 2.0 for now, and when you have the money to buy a good subwoofer, then do so
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
i agree with All Star. I had an old sub with my RF-82's and it might as well have not been plugged in. It was an old HTiB sub, 8" no less, and bass from the fronts was far better (accurate and full). using just the towers will give you a solid foundation but in the future, you'll get a bump from using a dedicated sub.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
i dont know what is is and i would appreciate it.! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Hey Bro, This is what Nezff, sent me A while ago, when I asked the same question. It was really easy to hook up and set up via A/V reciever. Just the Terminology was confusing. Please don't laugh at it, I love my 82's biampd' heres a small diagram via Nezff..... ENJOY IT.. BTW...MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE BRASS STRAPS REMOVED FIRST, note: The white box to the right of the diagram represents the Klipsch Tower ![]() Last edited by RIPSeanTaylor21; 09-05-2008 at 05:04 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
well i was originaly going to do that guess i was right all along.! thanx RIPSeanTaylor21 for the help, but wat if you just used only 2 terminals? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
and to follow up on that
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Member
|
![]()
then you are simply bi-wiring... which has little advantage in my experience
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Special Member
|
![]()
the advantage to bi-wiring is supposed to be less overall resistance (because the signals have twice as many paths) but it does not send highs and lows out separately like bi-amping does, you are sending the same high-low signal to both the high and low inputs on the speaker... thus the speaker does just as much work as if you just left the brass straps on and ran a single set of wires
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
so let me get this straight; when i bi-amp,conecting all for speaker ports to the receiver, i get more bass and treble? and when i only use 2 speaker ports to connect to my reciever it would be called bi-wiring? which is good for hier frequency's? i have no sub, and i dont plan to purchase one, so in my case i would be better suited for bi-amping my klipsch rf-82's to get better bass and lower frequency signals right? am i on the right page? or am i missing someting?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Bi Amping is not THAT big of an improvement, but if you have the speaker wire to do it, the extra bit of improvement you get is worth it.
Bi Wiring is simply connecting 2 sets of wire (4 ends) to the back of the speaker, but only connecting those wires to one set of terminals on the receiver Bi Amping is using 2 sets of wire connected to 2 separate sets of terminals on the receiver. I would recommend a subwoofer when you finally upgrade to 5.1 but for now the towers will do fine. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
As for surrounds... it depends on the room layout... if you would be kinda cramming the towers into a corner, I'd go with RS-52s instead. If you have the room to do towers, great. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Moderator
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Active Member
|
![]()
In my pioneer elite SC-09TX manual on page 10,under 5.2-channel Bi-amp connections,Features:The front,center and surround channels are all reproduced with high quality(bi-amp).Fewer speakers are used than with other patterns and the maximum number of channels is 5.2, but this pattern provides the highest sound quality.(My opinion it sound great,more on page 12 & 70.) I only had my front left & front right Bi-amp on my elite VSX-94TXH receiver,the sound was very impressive.( I Bi-amp to save money on speakers and I only have room for 5 speakers & I think it sound better( my opinion and page 10 opinion only ).
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
advice on this 5.1 surround system | Home Theater General Discussion | andy86i | 1 | 05-12-2009 11:09 PM |
Advice for $2k system | Home Theater General Discussion | evman333 | 10 | 04-27-2009 07:22 AM |
7.1 speaker system, need advice | Receivers | Erman_94 | 18 | 02-06-2008 09:05 PM |
Need Advice for Surround System | Home Theater General Discussion | blushiz | 22 | 03-25-2007 02:44 AM |
Sound system advice?? | Home Theater General Discussion | frankc4s | 6 | 03-20-2007 05:53 PM |
|
|