|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.52 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
I've read both threads and same issue has come up in both threads so I figured I'd make one thread for the topic(I didn't see one so direct me to it if there is one) instead of continuously going back and forth between the two threads.
For those of you who have the the Panasonic 55 or the Sony 550, why did you choose the one you have or if you were deciding between one of these why did you choose one over the over? They seem to be near mirror images of on another so is it a coin toss or is one truly better than the other? Anything you think matters from dvd upscaling to price is appreciated. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Sep 2008
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
![]()
All other things being equal, and these players are pretty much equal, I chose the BD55 because of two features.
1. On the BD55, the digital and analog outputs operate simultaneously and independently. I use analog for lossless BDs and digital bitstream for DVDs. The Sony can't do that. 2. I can leave Secondary Audio on all of the time and lossless is still decoded in the player. With the Sony, turning on secondary audio means a lossy track is used even if there's no secondary audio present. So, you have to switch player settings to listen to commentaries. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
Anyone else?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
|
![]()
im a fan of Sony products... the 550 looks like a bd player... panasonic looks like a normal dvd player LOL
I couldn't tell you spec wise why I choose the 550 over any other player on the market.. other then the bravia sync i use with my tv. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
If you use BD-LIVE a lot and download a lot of HD video clips the Panasonic has a front loading SD card slot where as the Sony USB slot is harder to access since it is in the back. Also the Panasonic has better DVD upconversion. The Sony will upconvert 480I DVD's to 1080P/60 where the Panasonic has a option to do a reverse 3:2 pulldown for 480I DVD's and upconvert to 1080P/24. Load times are little faster on the Panasonic compared to the Sony.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Seems like it's the Sony machines that have firmware issues that take a while to get resolved. Panasonic is pretty quick, or typically ahead of the game; blu-rays just about always play on day one with the Panasonics; on the rare occasion when not the case, Panasonic gets the firmware updated within a few days. Rarely hear about a disk that does not play on a Panasonic; check this website for all the various Sony issues that have cropped up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I had Sony Rewards points and picked up the 550 for "free".
So far the player has been very dependable. It loads fast, I have not had any issues with discs and seems to have an easy user interface. I haven't used the DMP55 (I am sure it is a great piece of equipment) but I don't think you would be disappointed with the 550. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
I am going with one of these two models as well...so far all of the technical/operational differences mentioned here favor the Panasonic.
Are there any areas where the Sony is superior?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
|
![]()
I just purchased the panny 55k and I currently own the Sony 500 and decided against the BDP 550 due to all the confusion about the DTHD-MA. I do think the panny has better picture quality than the 500 and 550. Nevertheless, I am awaiting a 200-300 price drop on the 5000ES. The panny is easy to set up, great PQ and AQ and seems to be more intuitive but in the end I would not have squabbled with the 550. It is also a great machine.....I just get sick and tired of Sony cutting corners and being ambiguous.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
It seems to me that the Panasonic is more agreeable and user friendly than the Sony despite how similar they may be.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Jan 2008
|
![]()
Does this all mean that the actual performance of the two players is basically identical?
I'd read a few comments which suggested that the Panny: - gave better picture quality when upscaling SD DVDs - have better audio quality when internally processing audio and sending via analog. How valid are those criticisms? If they are borne out by your collective experiences, would anyone take a punt as to whether they actually worth the extra price of the Panny? Personally, I have an elderly SD DVD player (doesn't upscale, does do prog scan) so I'm figuring that EITHER player will have better SD DVD picture quality than I currently experience and the HD audio quality will be much better than regular DD5.1 or DTS in either case. I'm not seeing an awful lot that is telling me I must buy the Panasonic from a performance point of view. Have I overlooked anything? |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I went back and forth between The Panny 35 and the Sony S350, and I ended up keeping the Panny because of this:
Better sound on the Panny through my LCD Speakers. I don't have any audio equipments and the Sony just sounded too low and the dialog sometimes was hard to make out. With the Panny I don't have that issue. The Panny has the slow motion option while the Sony Does not. Other than that, I think both players puts out great PQ and boot up and loading time it's just about the same. They are both very quick. I also think that the Sony looks nicer than the Panny. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Nov 2008
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
It appears that the Panasonic costs about $20 more than the Sony, on average.
I am also torn between the two brands. I think it comes down to which one is the most reliable. It appears the Panasonic has a slight advantage in reliability. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
Yea. It sounds like the Panasonic is worth the extra money.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Active Member
|
![]()
We own a lot of Sony equipment, and after reading the manual for the S550, our next 1080p set might be a Sony, too. That Bravia Sync looks pretty neat. I think we only owned 2 Panasonic products before, a VCR and a TV. As far as I can remember, we have had 3 Sony receivers, 4 Sony DVD players, and a TV. So that's one reason we went with the S550. Another was that the S550 was $305 when we bought it, and the BD55K was $325ish. I knew they were about equal in features. Lastly, but likely the least, is that the S550 just looked cooler with its blue front. It looks even better than the picture.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
Is there any factual data showing the Panasonic to be more reliable than the Sony, in regards to the Blu-Ray players?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Junior Member
Nov 2008
|
![]()
It seems that all the + features line up with panny...at least from this thread.
+ Panny 1. On the BD55, the digital and analog outputs operate simultaneously and independently. I use analog for lossless BDs and digital bitstream for DVDs. The Sony can't do that. 2. I can leave Secondary Audio on all of the time and lossless is still decoded in the player. With the Sony, turning on secondary audio means a lossy track is used even if there's no secondary audio present. So, you have to switch player settings to listen to commentaries. 3. If you use BD-LIVE a lot and download a lot of HD video clips the Panasonic has a front loading SD card slot where as the Sony USB slot is harder to access since it is in the back. 4. Also the Panasonic has better DVD upconversion. The Sony will upconvert 480I DVD's to 1080P/60 where the Panasonic has a option to do a reverse 3:2 pulldown for 480I DVD's and upconvert to 1080P/24. 5. Load times are little faster on the Panasonic compared to the Sony. 6. Seems like it's the Sony machines that have firmware issues that take a while to get resolved. Panasonic is pretty quick, or typically ahead of the game; blu-rays just about always play on day one with the Panasonics; on the rare occasion when not the case, Panasonic gets the firmware updated within a few days. Rarely hear about a disk that does not play on a Panasonic; check this website for all the various Sony issues that have cropped up. 7. The Panny has the slow motion option while the Sony Does not. + Sony $20 cheaper, looks better |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
It looks like I will go with the Panasonic BD55K. It's $20 more than the Sony but it looks it does have a slight advantage over the Sony.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
Well, I went with the Panasonic DMP-BD55K
![]() Plus I got the $100 off and 4 Blu-Ray DVD's (Blood Diamond, GoodFellas, The Perfect Storm, Batman Begins) with the deal. All the above plus delivery for $304.00! ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Sony BDP-S550 or Panny DMP-BD55? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | bone crusher | 7 | 04-05-2009 05:14 PM |
Sony BDP-S550 vs. Panasonic DMP-BD55, info needed | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Bobbie Swager | 6 | 03-09-2009 08:05 PM |
Sony BDP-550 or Panasonic DMP-BD55? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Italia | 21 | 01-08-2009 03:04 PM |
Sony BDP-S550 vs Panasonic DMP-BD55K | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Tigerbert | 38 | 11-17-2008 09:14 PM |
Sony BDP-S550 or Panasonic DMP-BD50? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | ZMan | 8 | 07-16-2008 10:26 PM |
|
|