|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $30.50 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
In this article Gary Merson and Michael Framer show the problems still inherent with 120Hz and 240Hz LCD and/or LED sets, relating to motion interpolation and its relationship with motion resolution.
The conclusion? Motion resolution only scores high when motion interpolation is on...and the image is always degraded as a result. The video shows you exactly what's happening on the screen in these instances. http://hdguru.com/120240-hz-lcd-problems-exposed/569/ Original link - http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xb1...s-exposed_tech |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Awesome find doby, good read. Having a frame interpolation set my self, i do keep my interpolation on, but usually on low. not because im fascinated with the "Window effect" i just value motion resolution a little more than losing a little quality detail. eagar to see what sets look like in 2-3 years, with time to improve the chips and possibly eliminate the mis-interpolation/artifacts.
Last edited by dereksworl; 11-23-2009 at 05:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Power Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Moderator
|
![]()
excellent excellent article folks!
definitely worth a sticky!!! heres my contribution.... LCD Response Time ShootOut can we compile the links in the original posting by the way? ![]() Last edited by jomari; 11-23-2009 at 06:10 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Active Member
|
![]()
GREAT article!
"Activating the ME/MC circuit created some nasty artifacts." "This translates to a loss of fine detail such as film grain and overall image alteration." and "Therefore, to achieve image consistency, the LCD panel must degrade the actual frame’s image quality to match that of the synthesized frame, which is why the test pattern shows the degradation." By these two statments, although the image / film / motion may appear more "fluid" it is actually of significate lower quality at times on your actual display becuase the computer within the player and the tv while communicating are guessing where the frame will go next. My next question then lies with, does the PS3 stream data to the hard drive before actually playing a disk, like cache? If so wouldn't a PS3 then be capable of far greater image quality than any standalone player due to it's internal processing, ram, and harddrive? Last edited by onehothemi; 12-01-2009 at 12:16 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Expert Member
Nov 2008
kansas city, MO
|
![]()
So is there any real advantage to buying a 120hz over a 60?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Samsung LED/LCD 8500 240hz HDTV | LCD TVs | The Dragon | 67 | 08-09-2010 06:02 PM |
240hz LED LCD vs 600hz Plasma? Which one has better picture? | New Display Technologies | mugupo | 11 | 09-14-2009 03:26 PM |
Samsung first on the block with 240Hz LCD prototype, 100% better motion | New Display Technologies | xtop | 32 | 07-21-2009 06:32 PM |
240Hz LCD TV'S | Display Theory and Discussion | yankees3 | 8 | 05-13-2009 04:39 PM |
240Hz LCD | New Display Technologies | scrumptious | 55 | 04-11-2009 02:22 AM |
|
|