|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 59 min ago
| ![]() $124.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.95 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.97 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $22.95 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.79 8 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I don't support HD-DVD at all, at times it makes me quite angry...and this triple layer crap is getting on my nerves:
Just a simple honest question about this "approved" Triple Layer HD-DVD disc that people have been talking about. Why is the capacity 51GB and not 45? Since HD-DVD is 15gigs per a layer...wouldn't 45 make sense. I'm sure this question has been answered somewhere, but I really have no clue. So if the disc IS 51, why don't they have 34gig dual layer discs, or 17 gig single layer discs... I'm just confused |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Are Blu-ray fans more honest? Sites that claim to be neutral usually HD DVD biased... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | mov9384ie | 59 | 11-19-2007 03:10 AM |
Triple layer Blu-ray | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | stringent | 11 | 09-28-2007 09:23 PM |
HD DVD "twin format;" triple layer disc | General Chat | jedisinclair | 17 | 06-20-2007 07:40 PM |
HD DVD's 51GB triple layer disc announcement | Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software | gvortex7 | 4 | 01-17-2007 06:12 PM |
HD-DVD creates a triple layer hybrid | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Stef Nighthawk | 32 | 09-13-2006 10:38 PM |
|
|