As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
6 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
8 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
13 hrs ago
Harlem Nights (Blu-ray)
$4.99
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
4 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Bloodstained Italy (Blu-ray)
$42.99
1 hr ago
Black Eye (Blu-ray)
$9.99
11 hrs ago
The Beastmaster 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
4 hrs ago
Looney Tunes Collector's Choice: Volume 4 (Blu-ray)
$12.60
7 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2008, 10:33 PM   #1
MerrickG MerrickG is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
MerrickG's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
College Station, TX
2
Default The BDA did something stupid and comments like these make you wonder...

Well, the BDA made some really stupid comments that got reported on betanews that in my opinion could really end up causing a lot of controversy.


http://www.betanews.com/article/Blur...nto/1199841379


It’s the customers problem for buying too early:

“When BetaNews asked developers of BD Live whether they were concerned about a backlash from early adopters who supported the format from the beginning, we were told: "They knew what they were getting into."

BDA President Andy Parsons echoed that sentiment at the Blu-ray press conference Monday, telling BetaNews that it's normal for new technology to change and older hardware to become obsolete. ”


Apparently, it’s HD DVD’s fault for making them release too soon:


“When BetaNews asked why these manufacturers rushed out players that were not fully capable and potentially buggy due to their BD-J implementation, the Blu-ray partner pointed blame across the room to HD DVD. "We should have waited another year to introduce Blu-ray to the public, but the format war changed the situation," he said. HD DVD was already coming and the BDA had no choice but to launch Blu-ray.”


While I agree with the above to an extend, its just really stupid to see things like this
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:37 PM   #2
Cory108 Cory108 is offline
Active Member
 
Cory108's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
63
1
2
Default

Thats just the way life is. They had to release when they did or HD DvD would have had 100% of the market share. People would have had no choice. Getting Blu out the door was great I guess, I bought a PS3 when they launched but waited to get a player until more than a year after that. I mean look, if the PS3 would have been pushed up to be closer to the 360, things might be different.

They chose to go up against the Wii, instead.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:38 PM   #3
spam.curitiba spam.curitiba is offline
Expert Member
 
spam.curitiba's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
172
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrick97 View Post
Well, the BDA made some really stupid comments that got reported on betanews that in my opinion could really end up causing a lot of controversy.


http://www.betanews.com/article/Blur...nto/1199841379


It’s the customers problem for buying too early:

“When BetaNews asked developers of BD Live whether they were concerned about a backlash from early adopters who supported the format from the beginning, we were told: "They knew what they were getting into."

BDA President Andy Parsons echoed that sentiment at the Blu-ray press conference Monday, telling BetaNews that it's normal for new technology to change and older hardware to become obsolete. ”


Apparently, it’s HD DVD’s fault for making them release too soon:


“When BetaNews asked why these manufacturers rushed out players that were not fully capable and potentially buggy due to their BD-J implementation, the Blu-ray partner pointed blame across the room to HD DVD. "We should have waited another year to introduce Blu-ray to the public, but the format war changed the situation," he said. HD DVD was already coming and the BDA had no choice but to launch Blu-ray.”


While I agree with the above to an extend, its just really stupid to see things like this
And I am sure these comments will be blown out more than they really need to be.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:38 PM   #4
Blus Brother Blus Brother is offline
Senior Member
 
Blus Brother's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

by the way love Exodus and old school thrash, but I dont believe any harm will come of anything they said - for one, everyone of us who sees this stuff, there are another million who never will. I think we who really keep us with this news are in the minority.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:41 PM   #5
Whytewash Whytewash is offline
Special Member
 
Whytewash's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
'Couve, WA
60
1
Send a message via AIM to Whytewash Send a message via Yahoo to Whytewash
Default

I honestly dont see an issue with this. Yeah it was a pretty stupid comment but honestly, Had the BDA not launched when they did, we could all quite possibly have HD DVD players right now. BD could have ended up being like HD VMD or whatever that new thing is and none of us would have been the wiser.

BD came out when they did for a reason and personally, Im happy for it
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:42 PM   #6
Seabass Seabass is offline
Member
 
Oct 2007
Default

To me it's stating the obvious. Also there were some editorial remarks that led the reader if one thinks about it. The "blame HD-DVD" part was asinine. It is what it is. HD-DVD was there already, what the BDA are going to wait and let that format get waaayyyy ahead. To me it's the only move that made sense at the time.

Just the facts, just the facts, and them was the facts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:43 PM   #7
MerrickG MerrickG is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
MerrickG's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
College Station, TX
2
Default

The reality is that it is not a HUGE issue, when you consider that far and away the majority of the bluray users are on the PS3 and he is right that the majority of people are into bluray for one thing:

Movies, not features.

But nevertheless the BDA needs to work very hard to start phasing out the 1.0 players.

I have Sunshine and 3:10 to Yuma, and while PiP is certainly cool. I can certainly say the majority of users will be fine without it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:46 PM   #8
user friendly user friendly is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
The Great White North
7
87
Default

Yeah, it's not like the movies won't work or anything that drastic. I wouldn't be too upset if I couldn't check the web features or the pip jazz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:49 PM   #9
Striker Striker is offline
Member
 
Striker's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrick97 View Post
The reality is that it is not a HUGE issue, when you consider that far and away the majority of the bluray users are on the PS3 and he is right that the majority of people are into bluray for one thing:

Movies, not features.

But nevertheless the BDA needs to work very hard to start phasing out the 1.0 players.

I have Sunshine and 3:10 to Yuma, and while PiP is certainly cool. I can certainly say the majority of users will be fine without it.
Owning a Sony 300 I am kinda bummed about the feature availables on upcoming players. I will tell you I am sick and tired of hearing on this format war and believe it is time for all to move on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:53 PM   #10
NovaBomb NovaBomb is offline
Active Member
 
NovaBomb's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrick97 View Post
it's normal for new technology to change and older hardware to become obsolete. ”
yeah, and the older hardware at the time was going for $1200
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:00 PM   #11
OokieSpookie OokieSpookie is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrick97 View Post
Well, the BDA made some really stupid comments that got reported on betanews that in my opinion could really end up causing a lot of controversy.


http://www.betanews.com/article/Blur...nto/1199841379


It’s the customers problem for buying too early:

“When BetaNews asked developers of BD Live whether they were concerned about a backlash from early adopters who supported the format from the beginning, we were told: "They knew what they were getting into."

BDA President Andy Parsons echoed that sentiment at the Blu-ray press conference Monday, telling BetaNews that it's normal for new technology to change and older hardware to become obsolete. ”


Apparently, it’s HD DVD’s fault for making them release too soon:


“When BetaNews asked why these manufacturers rushed out players that were not fully capable and potentially buggy due to their BD-J implementation, the Blu-ray partner pointed blame across the room to HD DVD. "We should have waited another year to introduce Blu-ray to the public, but the format war changed the situation," he said. HD DVD was already coming and the BDA had no choice but to launch Blu-ray.”


While I agree with the above to an extend, its just really stupid to see things like this
And what exactly do you want them to say?
It is pretty much the truth of the matter.
The bottom line is that there are players out there that are not up to par with newer ones and no smooth talking pr is going to change that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:01 PM   #12
MerrickG MerrickG is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
MerrickG's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
College Station, TX
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bosels11 View Post
by the way love Exodus and old school thrash, but I dont believe any harm will come of anything they said - for one, everyone of us who sees this stuff, there are another million who never will. I think we who really keep us with this news are in the minority.
Exodus rules. I would have rather chosen to use an avatar for an album like Tempo of the Damned or Fabulous Disaster, which in my opinion is the BEST thrash album to come out of the 80s.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:04 PM   #13
frenchglen frenchglen is offline
Active Member
 
frenchglen's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Default

This will only appear controvesial to former HD-DEAD fanboys who seem to value extra features and internet connectivity more than picture and audio quality, and who think that a new format can suddenly come out and immediately be completed, ready and cheap for the masses.

+ people with short tempers (no I'm not singling anyone out here).

HD-DVD's price was too good to be true. It was crappy second-best HD, it was quick-to-market, and cheap. And now, dead.

But I do agree, that PR person is pretty stupid for saying that. Even though it is true, it can never be helping to say that it was your customers' fault for buying your product.

But growing pains are a part of any new format, and early adopters should accept that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:08 PM   #14
Seretur Seretur is offline
Special Member
 
Seretur's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
An Island in the Adriatic
521
5
2
Default

Why is this stupid? There's nothing we didn't know in this article. And raise your hand if you've never bought a second DVD player in your life, to take advantage of region-free playability, upscaling, DTS, whatever.

People can choose to get offended by these comments, but then, nowadays people can choose to get offended by just about anything under the Sun.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:19 PM   #15
blckshp blckshp is offline
Member
 
blckshp's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
The Rockies
Default I wouldn't worry

Betanews website's reputation has been sliding downhill for a while. They are known for their overzealous HD DVD fanboys, pirates, and rippers. While the person that was asked the questions may have said something to that effect, I'm sure there was quite a bit of "artistic license" put into the reply. It's a site that could disappear from the web and wouldn't be missed by me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:20 PM   #16
frenchglen frenchglen is offline
Active Member
 
frenchglen's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seretur View Post
People can choose to get offended by these comments, but then, nowadays people can choose to get offended by just about anything under the Sun.
+100
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 12:12 AM   #17
onanie onanie is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seretur View Post
People can choose to get offended by these comments, but then, nowadays people can choose to get offended by just about anything under the Sun.
Great post!

Any attempt from BDA to tell it differently would be gleefully construed as a cover up. Those weren't genuine questions - any sensible person already knew the answer. Parsons left them no more ammunition than is necessary.

And often the people who get most "upset" by these comments are HD DVD fanboys stirring up a situation. It never mattered to them what the BDA answer was going to be anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 01:29 AM   #18
Richard Paul Richard Paul is offline
Senior Member
 
Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrick97 View Post
Well, the BDA made some really stupid comments that got reported on betanews that in my opinion could really end up causing a lot of controversy.


http://www.betanews.com/article/Blur...nto/1199841379
...
To me that looks like nothing more than anti-Blu-ray propaganda made by a HD DVD supporter trying to smear Blu-ray. Nate Mook has been posting pro-HD DVD articles on betanews for a good while so I wouldn't believe any of his negative claims against Blu-ray unless he had some evidence for them. Also note that the only quote in that article that has a name attached to it is the quote from Andy Parsons who said more than the bit that Nate Mook mentioned.

Merrick, don't take this the wrong way but don't be so quick to accept these articles just because someone posted them on the internet. All that does it give credibility to articles that don't provide evidence for what they are claiming. The only quote I see in that article that even comes close to coming from the BDA was the one from Andy Parsons while all the other quotes supposedly come from unnamed sources.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 03:30 AM   #19
The Don The Don is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Apr 2006
12
2
Default

I don't really get offended...

he is a dumbass though, so don't confuse my words for being narrowminded or anything ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 04:31 AM   #20
Neo65 Neo65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Neo65's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Default

VHS and DVD both had improvements going forward. VHS added Linear Stereo, then HiFi. 1st DVD players could not decode DD multi-channel, the next batch couldn't handle DTS at all. See the component video output? The first and 2nd batch of players didn't even have them! Even the ability to decode JPEG and DIVX was a late addition. As is the progressive playback via componentVideo.

The point is that in CE space, the 'finished standard' emphasis is on "finished" as opposed to standard. Things that don't evolve are "finished" as in "kaput" o/w known as "he dead".

If AVRs stop adding new features, it'd be "finished" too. Remember DolbyProLogic? Matrix Surround? AC3? DTS? Component switching, HDMI upconvert? Now DTHD and DTSHDMA and PCM 7.1. These are all features that is part and parcel of how things evolve. You can be sure there will be new features.

As soon as DVD players ran out of features, yup. It was "finished" too and became disposable.

Well look at PCs. That's a real fancy toy that survived well didn't it? Why did PCs look so alive? Maybe it's because it's never "finished".

Meanwhile look at HD DVD and claims that it's "finished". Ok. Never mind. I rest my case.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
How come the BDA hasnt tried to make a deal with MS? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology MerrickG 21 10-31-2007 02:49 PM
BDA better make some moves soon Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology BigB88 75 10-28-2007 07:55 AM
BD covers you wish the BDA would make Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology WriteSimply 66 08-26-2007 02:33 AM
Stupid woman expects to make $$ off of iPhone General Chat baccusboy 4 07-16-2007 03:42 PM
bda will have an announcement to make in early september Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology erdega79 9 09-24-2005 06:17 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 PM.