|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $40.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $15.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.49 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $27.13 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $12.52 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.99 |
|
View Poll Results: Is it a hindrance? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 31.58% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 68.42% |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Hollywood movies tend to cast attractive people in roles, even if they're not meant for them. I can remember Licorice Pizza being considered groundbreaking for doing the exact opposite.
That said, does anyone here think attractive actors can also be hindered by their looks when it comes to the roles they get or not get? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|