As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
1 hr ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
16 hrs ago
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.79
12 hrs ago
Alfred Hitchcock: The Ultimate Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$124.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2007, 11:25 PM   #1
Maximus Maximus is offline
Super Moderator
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Default It is all about numbers, and the ones for HD DVD don't add up!

I was just thinking about the announcement from HD DVD that they have an attachment rate of 28 discs/year. So that would mean from April - December the average HD DVD consumer would have bought 2/3*28=18.66 discs/player.

Toshiba announced that they have sold 175,000 standalone players, which would lead us to believe that there were 18.66*175,000~3,270,000 discs.

Now the latest number from the HD DVD camp is that they have shipped 1.5m HD DVDs.

So which is it, 1.5m DVDs or 28 discs/year because it can't be both.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 11:56 PM   #2
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

The flaw in your logic is that you assume that they sold all 175K players at the begining of the time period.

If it were a steady rate of sales over the period, you could approximate it by using the number of units total number of units sold at the mid-point (this assumes a steady rate of sales) this mid point number would be half of the 175k, or 87.5k, the reason this works is that with a straight line increase in sales, the higher number of units later in the year balances out the lower number of units earlier in the year.

using this approximation, sales figures would be half of total you calculated, or 1,632,750 This number is less than 9% off from the claimed number shipped, of course the ACTUAL number sold is a little bit less, because of that 1,500,000 shipped, some percentage is held in stock etc.

While I like to poke holes in the HD fanboy's foolish and grandiose claims as much as the next guy, this claim is actually in the realm of statistical possibility.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 12:03 AM   #3
Maximus Maximus is offline
Super Moderator
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman_II View Post
The flaw in your logic is that you assume that they sold all 175K players at the begining of the time period.

If it were a steady rate of sales over the period, you could approximate it by using the number of units total number of units sold at the mid-point (this assumes a steady rate of sales) this mid point number would be half of the 175k, or 87.5k, the reason this works is that with a straight line increase in sales, the higher number of units later in the year balances out the lower number of units earlier in the year.

using this approximation, sales figures would be half of total you calculated, or 1,632,750 This number is less than 9% off from the claimed number shipped, of course the ACTUAL number sold is a little bit less, because of that 1,500,000 shipped, some percentage is held in stock etc.

While I like to poke holes in the HD fanboy's foolish and grandiose claims as much as the next guy, this claim is actually in the realm of statistical possibility.
I thought about that too, but they were clear in saying that for every player that they sold 28 discs go with it per year. Unless of course they did a similar mid-point type of calculation to make their numbers look unreasonably high. In which case the BD attach rate should be even higher as most of the players were only sold after November.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 12:27 AM   #4
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxpower1987 View Post
I thought about that too, but they were clear in saying that for every player that they sold 28 discs go with it per year. Unless of course they did a similar mid-point type of calculation to make their numbers look unreasonably high. In which case the BD attach rate should be even higher as most of the players were only sold after November.
28 per year means that ones sold in april would account for 18.66 discs (2/3s of a year), but the players sold in November would only have one months worth, or 2.3 discs.

Trust me, the math works, while the news release is highly spun to tell the story they want to tell, it isn't REALLY wrong, and it doesn't make their numbers unreasonably high. Infact, they probably back calculated the attachment rate from sales figures, and conveniently neglecting to take into consideration recent decreases in sales. That same back calculation works in our favor to make BD numbers appear larger, because, the "attachment rate" is much higher during the first month or two, when people suffer from "disc-pression" the depressed state arising from not having enough media to play on your new player. Everyone who went out and bought 5 discs in december to go with their new PS3 registered a statistical attachment rate of 60/year.

Figures lie, and liars figure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 12:37 AM   #5
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1160
7047
4044
Default

Dude, Maxi, I already posted about this! Don't you subscribe to the Deci-blu news?

Now love one another, while I tend to my couch of perpetual indulgence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 12:39 AM   #6
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

Sorry, can't help running numbers, its that whole "engineer" thing
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 12:52 AM   #7
Maximus Maximus is offline
Super Moderator
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
Dude, Maxi, I already posted about this! Don't you subscribe to the Deci-blu news?

Now love one another, while I tend to my couch of perpetual indulgence.
I must have missed your crazy set of decicalculations .
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2007, 01:24 AM   #8
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1160
7047
4044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman_II View Post
Sorry, can't help running numbers, its that whole "engineer" thing
As in?

Scotty! I need more discs!!

Ye canna' change th' laws o' physics, Adm'ral!



Iceman_II and Maxpower1987 looking back at Admiral Craig



  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
HD-DVD disks sales numbers General Chat chrisshea 24 11-30-2007 05:21 PM
DVD Empire numbers: Looks like HD-DVD is going to win this week... hope not!! General Chat me_inside 40 10-18-2007 07:59 PM
By The Numbers - Why the HD DVD/Blu-Ray War Is Over Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology babyBlu 10 07-02-2007 08:00 PM
Let's speculate and add to the numbers of posts Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology blitz6speed 33 06-29-2007 06:58 AM
numbers of 360 add-on sold? -question- Xbox 360 mainman 4 01-13-2007 10:58 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 PM.