|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $29.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $30.50 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I cut-n-past some of this from the main thread as I am hoping for more feedback.
Standalone BDP-S30x owners should remember these are second generation tanks, and they pretty much run like one. These are slower chip sets, not Play Station 3's. If the 4.20 firmware loads BD-J movies under 90 seconds consider it "normal and acceptable for a tank". Let us be grateful it now supports Dolby(r) TrueHD Audio. Unlike the mixed results I have seen from the older firmwares, 4.20 not only loads movies faster, the menus are smoother and more responsive. All BD-J loading records are being shattered. Some by a wide margin, others by mere seconds. Standards of acceptable performance levels should be expected for these blu-ray player "tanks", because they can be slower. In short, we need a standard of measure. Here is my suggested "Load Time Performance Table". Consider 90 seconds and under as the tolerable sweet spot. * Non BD-J loading in 35 seconds or less. Excellent. * BD-J up to 75 seconds. Very Good. * BD-J 76 to 90 seconds. Good. (Tolerable Threshold) * BD-J 91 to 100 seconds. Very Fair * BD-J 101 to 120 seconds. Fair. * BD-J over 120 seconds. Poor. * BD-J over 180 seconds. Very Poor. Thoughts? Last edited by tron3; 08-29-2008 at 05:43 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I thought about making 120 the max threshold, but there are lots of factors to consider. Things like the load times people are accustomed to because of experience with DVD, PS3, and other players which were faster out the gate. I asked for the opinion of a friend who even cares to speculate on these things. He doesn't even own blu-ray but he appreciates how I feel about it. We agreed 90 seconds would be acceptable by most people. I could change it to 120 seconds, but the point of this thread is the hopes the studios see it and are cautious to create BD-J within the tolerable threshold. It's bad enough we have to sit through the previews, don't make us sit through bloat-code loading up. Last edited by tron3; 08-31-2008 at 02:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Is clapping at movies acceptable? | Movie Polls | Blu-Berry Pirate | 16 | 08-06-2009 01:57 AM |
The Sony BDP-S350 VS The Sony BDP-S550 Need Some Help | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | notezaa | 12 | 01-28-2009 03:13 PM |
Offical BD-J load times for Sony BDP-S30x with NEW firmware. | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | tron3 | 22 | 09-04-2008 01:06 AM |
Sony BDP-s500 and BDP-s2000es in stock at Sony.com | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Blu As Hell | 6 | 10-19-2007 02:51 PM |
Sony’s Bravia LCD line, Pioneer’s plasma series, and Samsung’s DLP models high rating | Home Theater General Discussion | HDTV1080P | 6 | 10-13-2007 03:04 AM |
|
|