now i want a front projector

[squirrel101]

after seeing the pics of you guys standing in front of your projected image i'm convinced that is the way to go.my movie room is 12' wide and 14' long so i may be able to achieve an image of about 101" but i suddenly became confused on screen size (fixed mount DIY) dimensions and cinescope (is that the curved screen?) and it looks like the new Panny is the best and most fogiving but i dunno would like to brand match with the pioneer elite but prob. can't afford it .

[WriteSimply]

According to my math, if you use the 12' wall, at 144" (your widest scope screen) the height of the screen will be 60", which will yield a 122" screen (diagonal) for 16:9 programming. OF course, that's pushing it 'cuz you need to mask it and what not. So allowing 6" on each side of the 12' wall, your widest scope screen at 132" will have a height of 55", which will yield a 112" diagonal 16:9 screen.

If you put the screen up on the long wall, giving a 12" allowance for a balanced mounting and masking, a 156" scope screen (13' x 12) will have a 65" height and yield a 132" diagonal 16:9 screen.

That's all well and done but you have to figure out which side can the projector accomodate with the throw distance as well as the room logistics (entrance, wall outlets). As always the bigger the screen, the bigger the impact. Whether or not you can handle a big screen at the seating distance, well that's another matter.

Without the anamorphic lens, you don't need the curved screen (if you buy the AE3000).


fuad

[AlabamaBoy]

I too, after viewing some pics of front projectors will be taking the plunge with the Panasonic. My only decision is 2.37:1 CIH or 16:9. Isn't it true if I go with a 16:9 screen I will get true 1920 x 1080, and CIH I will only see 1920 x 810? Is this a deciding factor for most people?

[fupduk2]

Originally Posted by WriteSimply

According to my math, if you use the 12' wall, at 144" (your widest scope screen) the height of the screen will be 60", which will yield a 122" screen (diagonal) for 16:9 programming. OF course, that's pushing it 'cuz you need to mask it and what not. So allowing 6" on each side of the 12' wall, your widest scope screen at 132" will have a height of 55", which will yield a 112" diagonal 16:9 screen.

If you put the screen up on the long wall, giving a 12" allowance for a balanced mounting and masking, a 156" scope screen (13' x 12) will have a 65" height and yield a 132" diagonal 16:9 screen.

That's all well and done but you have to figure out which side can the projector accomodate with the throw distance as well as the room logistics (entrance, wall outlets). As always the bigger the screen, the bigger the impact. Whether or not you can handle a big screen at the seating distance, well that's another matter.

Without the anamorphic lens, you don't need the curved screen (if you buy the AE3000).


fuad

math...

[squirrel101]

the throw distance will be the 14' distance minus the depth of the projector , i used the calculator on that other website and the screen would only be about 101". so i need to build the screen according to the 16:9 in order to achieve the most picture detail?

[Beta Man]

Originally Posted by squirrel101

the throw distance will be the 14' distance minus the depth of the projector , i used the calculator on that other website and the screen would only be about 101". so i need to build the screen according to the 16:9 in order to achieve the most picture detail?

Not sure of that model projector (didn't look it up) but lense to screen is the throw distance (as you know obviously) but make sure you compensate for wires sticking out of the back (most projectors have inputs on the back) as well as where the thing vents out the heat..... mine vents in the front and sides, but some vent through the back which requires more space also.........


The picture detail should be a little better on a CIH, but you can read more here.... http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=554901

Now, if you want to do self masking etc..... that's a pretty adventurous DIY screen...... 16:9 and CIH both have their own merits..... since the majority of DVDs were created for 16:9, and I own a lot of DVDs, that's what I went with.....

[squirrel101]

beta man which projector did you use and how much distance did you need to achieve that screen shot of Star Wars cause that looks really nice.

[Beta Man]

Originally Posted by squirrel101

beta man which projector did you use and how much distance did you need to achieve that screen shot of Star Wars cause that looks really nice.

haha.... that one isn't mine..... that's a guy named Wolfgang Mayer, and it's about a 22' wide shot..... and also about a $200,000 setup if I had to guess........ (not an exaggeration in the least)


I have a Mitsubishi HC1500, projecting a 106" 16:9 image with a 12.5' throw distance

This is a picture (before window treatments, and various other tweaks) from my projector




My very modest (but very lengthy) build is here..... https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=59181 (of course I have more info than just the meat and potatoes of my theater...... I should really clean it up )

[squirrel101]

hey that's still a great picture, i'm possibly going to build a room in my garage later , but my money got really tight cause i left my job 4 months ago to be a stay@home dad , fortunately i already had all of my electronics

[drago3451]

I just got the Epson Home Cinema 6100 last week. I made a 106" screen out of material I found at a local fabric store. I will be looking into a 120" electric acoustic transparent screen but do not have the $1300.00 it will cost right now. My 60" TV looks small now and I do not think I can go back to watching movies on it again.

[WriteSimply]

Originally Posted by squirrel101

the throw distance will be the 14' distance minus the depth of the projector , i used the calculator on that other website and the screen would only be about 101". so i need to build the screen according to the 16:9 in order to achieve the most picture detail?

Hmmm. Using the calculator on Projector Central:

Using the 14' wall as the screen->
366cm (12 Feet) - 40cm (30cm Projector Depth + 10cm allowance) = 326cm of throw distance. You'll get an 82" 16:9 screen with 40" height and 72" width. If it's meant for CIH, the width is still 72" but height is 30", which means for 16:9, it's 61" diagonal.

Using the 12' wall as the screen->
427cm (14 Feet) - 40cm (30cm Projector Depth + 10cm allowance) = 387cm of throw distance. You'll get a 98" 16:9 screen with 48" height and 85" width. If it's meant for CIH, the width is still 85" but height is 35", which means for 16:9, it's 72.3" diagonal.

Smaller than my previous calculations.


fuad

[Brain Sturgeon]

Originally Posted by WriteSimply

Hmmm. Using the calculator on Projector Central:

Using the 14' wall as the screen->
366cm (12 Feet) - 40cm (30cm Projector Depth + 10cm allowance) = 326cm of throw distance. You'll get an 82" 16:9 screen with 40" height and 72" width. If it's meant for CIH, the width is still 72" but height is 30", which means for 16:9, it's 61" diagonal.

Using the 12' wall as the screen->
427cm (14 Feet) - 40cm (30cm Projector Depth + 10cm allowance) = 387cm of throw distance. You'll get a 98" 16:9 screen with 48" height and 85" width. If it's meant for CIH, the width is still 85" but height is 35", which means for 16:9, it's 72.3" diagonal.

Smaller than my previous calculations.


fuad

Wait, if you are talking a CIH system, then the width changes while the height is static:

For the first, your height would remain 40" with widths of 71.1" for 16:9 and 94" for 2.35:1.

For the second, your height would remain 48" with widths of 85.33" for 16:9 and 112.8" for 2.35:1.

You just have to make sure that there is enough lens zoom to achieve the picture widths (1.78:1 and 2.35:1) for the screen height that you choose at your fixed throw distance, assuming you want to do the zoom method of CIH.

[Beta Man]

Originally Posted by squirrel101

hey that's still a great picture, i'm possibly going to build a room in my garage later , but my money got really tight cause i left my job 4 months ago to be a stay@home dad , fortunately i already had all of my electronics

Good luck/enjoy/etc.... My wife (the good Dr.) and I are contemplating me becoming a stay-at-home dad.... with commuting to work, paying a nanny, etc.... it's not a bad idea (plus I'd love to spend more time with my son, and have more children also)