As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best PS3 Game Deals


Best PS3 Game Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Syndicate (PS3)
$15.05
 
Grease Dance (PS3)
$14.99
 
Battle vs Chess (PS3)
$39.99
 
Transformers Devastation (PS3)
$28.46
 
NBA 2K15 (PS3)
$18.99
8 hrs ago
Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3 FES (PS3)
$70.66
 
Cabela's Adventure Camp (PS3)
$19.70
1 day ago
Atelier Rorona: The Alchemist Of Arland (PS3)
$26.03
1 day ago
Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance (PS3)
$16.88
 
Batman: Arkham City (PS3)
$39.80
 
Bulletstorm (PS3)
$59.95
 
Rock of the Dead (PS3)
$39.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Gaming > PlayStation > PS3
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2009, 04:52 PM   #1
pitabun pitabun is offline
Active Member
 
pitabun's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Orange County, CA
Send a message via AIM to pitabun Send a message via MSN to pitabun
Default Higher Resolution Gaming

Am I the only one out there that actually really cares about whether games support native 720p vs 1080i/p?

Am I the only one that feels little less enthus'd when reading game specs as only supporting 720p or hearing its actually sub720?


In this age of high definition, I have noticed the following.


Gamers do not care about higher resolutions than their television.


Top of the pyramid: People with 1080p displays

Middle top: People with 1080i displays

Middle bottom: People with 720p displays

Bottom: People running 480p/i displays



Being at the top stinks, especially with games that spoil you like WipEout / Monsters / Eden / Stardust / Sigma / GTP.


It blows knowing native 1080p resolutions will be pretty much ignored by cross-platform developers in this generation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 04:54 PM   #2
SoCalTiger SoCalTiger is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SoCalTiger's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Los Angeles, CA
1
1
Default

It is a bit disappointing that consoles still do not run most 1080p games smoothly when PCs have hit that resolution for like 10 years now. Hopefully the next gen will be able to do it. Prices on graphics cards have come way way down. Fortunately, though, advancements in physics and other things have made it worth it. It's certainly still a MASSIVE step up from the previous Standard Definition gen.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 04:54 PM   #3
Pelican170 Pelican170 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Pelican170's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Newtown, CT
127
735
256
13
Default

Yes, i agree with you. Games should all be at 1080P. especially when paying $60 a pop haha.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 04:57 PM   #4
b0bby b0bby is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Sep 2008
North Carolina
153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pitabun View Post
Am I the only one out there that actually really cares about whether games support native 720p vs 1080i/p?

Am I the only one that feels little less enthus'd when reading game specs as only supporting 720p or hearing its actually sub720?


In this age of high definition, I have noticed the following.


Gamers do not care about higher resolutions than their television.


Top of the pyramid: People with 1080p displays

Middle top: People with 1080i displays

Middle bottom: People with 720p displays

Bottom: People running 480p/i displays



Being at the top stinks, especially with games that spoil you like WipEout / Monsters / Eden / Stardust / Sigma / GTP.


It blows knowing native 1080p resolutions will be pretty much ignored by cross-platform developers in this generation.
not this again. if the box lied and said uncharted or killzone 2 was 1080p could you even tell? continue hitting the "info" button on your remote and reading the back of the box it while others enjoy the games because it'll still say 720p.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 04:58 PM   #5
brett_day brett_day is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
brett_day's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Moore, Oklahoma
18
45
1
1
Send a message via Yahoo to brett_day
Default

i would rather a game be at a resolution that will still let it play well rather than be a resolution that will hamper it's performance.

GT5 is in 1080p, because of this it will run at just 30fps, which is still good but if it were at 720p it would run at 60fps. I would rather have the bump in performance than the bump in resolution.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:00 PM   #6
Grim Reaper Grim Reaper is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
Grim Reaper's Avatar
 
Jun 2006
Let Me In!
499
2022
25
13
Default

didnt sony say that the ps3 was all about playing games in 1080p?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:01 PM   #7
Shin-Ra Shin-Ra is offline
Super Moderator
 
Shin-Ra's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
5
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brett_day View Post
GT5 is in 1080p, because of this it will run at just 30fps, which is still good but if it were at 720p it would run at 60fps.
WRONG and how did you gather this amazing misinformation? GT5P is 60fps everywhere but replays where they add motion blur and various filters.

I'd rather see higher detail at 720p than lower detail with higher clarity at 1080p.

WipEout HD and GT5/P are impressive but I'm sure I'd be more impressed if they squeezed everything out at 720p fixed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:01 PM   #8
TheJesus TheJesus is offline
Active Member
 
TheJesus's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Baltimore, MD
84
Default

The PS3 or 360 does not have the horsepower to run many of these games at full 1080P. Maybe next gen.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:09 PM   #9
pitabun pitabun is offline
Active Member
 
pitabun's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Orange County, CA
Send a message via AIM to pitabun Send a message via MSN to pitabun
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin-Ra View Post
WRONG and how did you gather this amazing misinformation? GT5P is 60fps everywhere but replays where they add motion blur and various filters.

I'd rather see higher detail at 720p than lower detail with higher clarity at 1080p.

WipEout HD and GT5/P are impressive but I'm sure I'd be more impressed if they squeezed everything out at 720p fixed.
Is your TV native 720 or 1080? I see a big difference with my 1080p TV.

Whenever playing 720 games it basically expands the resolution to by 1080 screen and everything becomes more blurry as a result.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:12 PM   #10
Shin-Ra Shin-Ra is offline
Super Moderator
 
Shin-Ra's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
5
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pitabun View Post
Is your TV native 720 or 1080? I see a big difference with my 1080p TV.

Whenever playing 720 games it basically expands the resolution to by 1080 screen and everything becomes more blurry as a result.
Not as big a difference as the detail drop from supporting the higher native res.

Uncharted 2's glorious high res textures, depth of field, motion blurring and so on? Dream on at native 1080p.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:13 PM   #11
dereksworl dereksworl is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dereksworl's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Around
18
1
Default

I hear the 3sixty just actually discontinued its contract requirement for all games to be at least 720p. dont know if Sony will follow......I hope not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:15 PM   #12
Shin-Ra Shin-Ra is offline
Super Moderator
 
Shin-Ra's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
5
1
Default

That's never really been a requirement for either system, as you probably already know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:15 PM   #13
SoCalTiger SoCalTiger is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SoCalTiger's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Los Angeles, CA
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dereksworl View Post
I hear the 3sixty just actually discontinued its contract requirement for all games to be at least 720p. dont know if Sony will follow......I hope not.
A couple years back 360 was also advertising that all games had AA and they removed that via firmware when everything started to go RROD. It was supposedly a fix to combat E74.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:18 PM   #14
Shin-Ra Shin-Ra is offline
Super Moderator
 
Shin-Ra's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
5
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funsocaltiger View Post
A couple years back 360 was also advertising that all games had AA and they removed that via firmware when everything started to go RROD. It was supposedly a fix to combat E74.
This requirement never materialised either. Sub-HD launch games, no AA launch games.

Don't believe the RROD bit for a second, and certainly no game with AA suddenly had it deactivated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:21 PM   #15
SoCalTiger SoCalTiger is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SoCalTiger's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Los Angeles, CA
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin-Ra View Post
and certainly no game with AA suddenly had it deactivated.
Hmm interesting FWIW this is what people on the official XBOX forums were saying at the time I was investigating buying a 360. There was a pretty long thread of people saying games that had AA no longer had it after a firmware patch and speculating it was done to reduce RROD. I don't own a 360 personally so this isnt first hand info.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:23 PM   #16
dereksworl dereksworl is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dereksworl's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Around
18
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin-Ra View Post
That's never really been a requirement for either system, as you probably already know.
oh yeah, of course. I really didnt know if sony had anything like this. but for M$ I think it was purely cosmetic to make consumers think it was a req, but it was never really enforced. even Halo 3 was sub HD. i think they just figured it was time to end the charade lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:28 PM   #17
SDon1969 SDon1969 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SDon1969's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Massachusetts
32
745
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dereksworl View Post
oh yeah, of course. I really didnt know if sony had anything like this. but for M$ I think it was purely cosmetic to make consumers think it was a req, but it was never really enforced. even Halo 3 was sub HD. i think they just figured it was time to end the charade lol
Yeah Halo was like 640 or something like that. I thought I read that MS used to require 720 min but then eased up on that, but I am unsure.

EDIT - http://www.neoseeker.com/news/11698-...n-requirement/

I'd like to see games reach 1080p with full detail but I don't know if this gen can manage it. For now 720 is okay with me, they still look great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 05:32 PM   #18
pitabun pitabun is offline
Active Member
 
pitabun's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Orange County, CA
Send a message via AIM to pitabun Send a message via MSN to pitabun
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dereksworl View Post
oh yeah, of course. I really didnt know if sony had anything like this. but for M$ I think it was purely cosmetic to make consumers think it was a req, but it was never really enforced. even Halo 3 was sub HD. i think they just figured it was time to end the charade lol
That's one of the biggest reasons why I'm on the fence with ODST, especially with Uncharted coming out soon. Guess I don't have enough friends for online play to justify the lower res.


With everything that is said, I guess my only comfort would be to go back to computer gaming. Haven't been back since pre PS3's release.

Do people still use computer monitors nowadays for computer gaming? Or is everything through the TV?

Don't have room for a computer, let alone a workstation with a nice 24".
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 06:00 PM   #19
Septimus Prime Septimus Prime is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Septimus Prime's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
164
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shin-Ra View Post
That's never really been a requirement for either system, as you probably already know.
It actually has been and still is—at least for PS3. The requirement is that your game has to support 720 or 1080 (i or p). You don't need to support both, and it doesn't have to be native. Most games opt for 720.

As for the other console, while it may be true that that's no longer required, per se, that doesn't mean that it isn't still recommended, and it's not like devs will stop doing it all of a sudden.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 06:06 PM   #20
SoCalTiger SoCalTiger is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SoCalTiger's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Los Angeles, CA
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pitabun View Post
Do people still use computer monitors nowadays for computer gaming? Or is everything through the TV?

Don't have room for a computer, let alone a workstation with a nice 24".
Well I can't speak for other people but since newer graphic cards support either DVI-D or HDMI a lot of people switched to their HDTVs since most people who can afford a higher end computer have HDTVs anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Gaming > PlayStation > PS3

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Do we mark higher than we should? Blu-ray Movies - North America TheZoof 109 10-13-2009 03:27 PM
Tomb Raider Higher Resolution on PS3 than Xbox 360 PS3 vladittude0583 12 01-01-2009 06:59 PM
Native Resolution vs. Supported Resolution...What's the difference? PS3 Ascended_Saiyan 70 06-27-2008 07:36 PM
Profiles 1.1 and higher Blu-ray Players and Recorders nycomet 2 01-07-2008 04:21 PM
Will Blu-ray be able to have a higher resolution years down the line? Newbie Discussion Grisle 5 10-05-2007 09:10 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.