|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.95 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $28.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $27.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $26.59 | ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1581 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Mar 2007
|
![]()
LOL. White flashing is what I would have with the UB900 coming out of HDR stuff, or on first boot. It would stop usually.
With the X800, Id get a long delayed black screen when going back to home with a disc, not a big deal though. It works like butter with the X940E, which it should I guess... |
![]() |
![]() |
#1582 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Edit: It arrived today and I already have it hooked up. Last edited by ratandjmt; 08-11-2017 at 09:07 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | gkolb (08-11-2017), StingingVelvet (08-12-2017) |
![]() |
#1584 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1586 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
I actually got the Sony because it was the cheapest one that let you turn off HDR. I ended up getting a new TV and not needing that anyway, but it's still a very solid player for the price. Assuming the new one lasts anyway!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1587 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1588 |
Power Member
![]() Aug 2007
North Potomac, MD
|
![]()
Best Buy is now selling this player for $249.99.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1589 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
I sincerely hope it works out well for you. I haven't really had any issues with my player since I received it... I think late February? Besides the Fox Blu-ray playback debacle, that is. Thus far, it's really proven to be a top notch device. I had one minor freeze-up in the middle of a single 4K disc the entire time, one which thankfully couldnt be replicated. Good luck! |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | StingingVelvet (08-13-2017) |
![]() |
#1590 |
Power Member
|
![]()
I have been doing some A/B comparisons between blu rays played on my PS3 Slim, and 4K UHD blu rays played on my Sony UBP X800. Honestly, in most cases I think the 1080P blu ray looks better. The image is brighter and shows more detail. The Magnificent 7 is a prime example. The Shallows looked great on both, and the difference in the two were barely noticeable. Sausage Party was slightly brighter on blu ray, while appearing to be a tad sharper. Once again, the picture quality between the two were very similar. I did these comparisons sitting approximately 4 ft. from the screen. From a normal viewing distance of 12 to 14 ft. I doubt that I could notice any difference in image quality, besides the brightness differential. I should note that I did these comparisons on a 65 inch LG B6 OLED. I'm going to do some more comparing via The Revenant and Life when I have more time. So far the 4K UHD experience has been kind of disappointing, and besides Planet Earth II (which I have not compared to 1080p) I would not consider much of an upgrade. Certainly not for the inflated price tag of players and titles in comparison to blu ray.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1593 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
I prefer the player when it comes to 4K upscaling because the roll off in chroma resolution isn't as pronounced, it probably doesn't matter in real world viewing as opposed to test patterns but I leave it to the player nonetheless and the Sony is EXCELLENT, it's better than the Panny UB900 for DVD playback too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1594 |
Power Member
|
![]()
That's a good question. I'll have to get back to you on that. I think everything has looked great, regardless of player or format. I'm just not seeing a considerable difference in picture quality between the blu ray and UHD formats. Text during credits look sharper, but I feel that the overall detail is lost at times, possibly due to HDR? It's almost like they tried to capitalize on the infinite contrast ratio of OLED and made things too dark, resulting in a slightly murky picture when compared to it's blu ray counter part. That wasn't the case with the Shallows though, so I don't want to make a broad generalization until I see more content. Has anybody else found this to be the case when comparing the two formats?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1595 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1596 | ||
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#1598 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1599 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Thanks! I'll look into that. When I first used the player it boosted every setting up too high for my taste. It was like torch mode compared to my usual settings. I reset it to my normal settings. Standard; Backlight 57, Contrast 80, Brightness 52.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1600 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
My new Samsung T.V. set defaults Backlighting to 10 (the maximum) and contrast to 100 (also the maximum setting) when displaying HDR material. As my Samsung set (which is coupled with Sony's UBP X-800) is an edge lit display and I watch my movies on a fully dark room, would you change those settings but trying to keep HDR's highlites as much as possible?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|