As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
9 hrs ago
I Know What You Did Last Summer 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.99
14 hrs ago
Daiei Gothic: Japanese Ghost Stories Vol. 2 (Blu-ray)
$47.99
3 hrs ago
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
22 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
1 day ago
Army of Darkness 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.99
2 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
16 hrs ago
Army of Darkness 4K (Blu-ray)
$21.99
54 min ago
Creepshow 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.99
2 hrs ago
The Craft 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.99
54 min ago
Candyman 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.99
4 hrs ago
Touche Turtle and Dum Dum: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$22.99
54 min ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: Which version of Star Wars Blu-ray will you be purchasing (or not)?
The Complete Star Wars Saga 1,335 72.48%
The Prequel Box Set 20 1.09%
The Original Trilogy Box Set 110 5.97%
Not Purchasing Star Wars Blu-ray 377 20.47%
Voters: 1842. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2015, 12:56 AM   #55481
Nada Nada is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2015
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorheadache95 View Post
George Lucas himself has said that he actually has no problem with fan-edits and things of that nature. Plus there is not current in-print copies of the original cuts to purchase from Disney or Lucasfilm (the last release with them, containing the laserdisc transfers are OOP).

So no, I don't have a negative opinion about downloading a fan-preservation project like the Harmy Despecialized Editions. When Disney releases a new edition of Star Wars with the UOT I'll be rushing out the door to go buy it.
Lucas had no problem with fan films and encouraged it even. Fan edits are a different matter entirely. And making your own fan edit for distribution, whether profitable or not, is still piracy and still illegal and wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 01:03 AM   #55482
crazyBLUE crazyBLUE is offline
Moderator
 
crazyBLUE's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Pacific Northwest
89
479
1
38
30
Exclamation

Please get off the discussion of Piracy ~ Fan Edits for it is not to be discussed here.

Or I will remove it all ~ Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
PeterTHX (09-16-2015)
Old 09-16-2015, 01:06 AM   #55483
harpolini harpolini is offline
Expert Member
 
harpolini's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
WA, USA
18
237
92
3
1
Default

When it comes to the original trilogy, even if they spent millions & millions dollars on a restoration they would easily make their money back. It baffles me why any company in the business to make millions, would turn so much down.

And I'm just over here with that sad realization "I'll probably never have the chance to upgrade my letterbox VHS set... in my lifetime.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 01:10 AM   #55484
Nada Nada is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2015
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpolini View Post

And I'm just over here with that sad realization "I'll probably never have the chance to upgrade my letterbox VHS set... in my lifetime.
They are on the 2006 DVD and they are the best versions officially available on any format.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
harpolini (09-16-2015)
Old 09-16-2015, 01:26 AM   #55485
BuckNaked2k BuckNaked2k is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
 
Feb 2010
Connecticut
32
761
47
146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpolini View Post
...and I'm just over here with that sad realization, "I'll probably never have the chance to upgrade my letterbox VHS set... in my lifetime".
Harmy is your friend.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 01:35 AM   #55486
Roy_Batty Roy_Batty is offline
Expert Member
 
May 2010
Canada
1
13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nada View Post
They are on the 2006 DVD and they are the best versions officially available on any format.
And of course the bonus DVD's with the GOUT look like crap!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 01:58 AM   #55487
Scarface32 Scarface32 is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Scarface32's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
New York
24
1170
341
4
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpolini View Post
And I'm just over here with that sad realization "I'll probably never have the chance to upgrade my letterbox VHS set... in my lifetime.
These are what you want:




Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_Batty View Post
And of course the bonus DVD's with the GOUT look like crap!
Better than nothing.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
harpolini (09-16-2015), insomniac013 (09-16-2015), Nailwraps (09-16-2015)
Old 09-16-2015, 02:19 AM   #55488
Nailwraps Nailwraps is online now
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Nailwraps's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
USA
61
884
1828
3
Default

Yeah, I'm still grateful for these DVDs. Despite being sourced from the laserdiscs, at least it was finally released on a digital format. To me, that's all that matters.

Still, until Disney/Fox releases the OOT/OOS on Blu, I'll definitely look into Harmy's Despecialized Editions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 02:23 AM   #55489
Machine Gun Willy Machine Gun Willy is offline
Banned
 
May 2015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface32 View Post
These are what you want:






Better than nothing.
Those look awful on a modern television. No one should have to watch that crap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 02:26 AM   #55490
Roy_Batty Roy_Batty is offline
Expert Member
 
May 2010
Canada
1
13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface32 View Post
These are what you want:






Better than nothing.
Really, are you going to let George off with that! Prior to the sale of his company his net worth was 3 Billion dollars. A good chunk of that was from the profits of star wars, your telling me he could not do better than dusting off a ten year old non anamorphic transfer in 480i, 4X3 aspect ration of the original trilogy. And your ok with that?
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
antinoos (09-16-2015)
Old 09-16-2015, 02:47 AM   #55491
42041 42041 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Oct 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpolini View Post
When it comes to the original trilogy, even if they spent millions & millions dollars on a restoration they would easily make their money back. It baffles me why any company in the business to make millions, would turn so much down.

And I'm just over here with that sad realization "I'll probably never have the chance to upgrade my letterbox VHS set... in my lifetime.
Why does everyone on the internet think they know a company's revenues and expenses for a product better than the company does?
The perceived volume of internet outrage and the actual monetary value of it can be very disproportionate. And when you consider that restoring Star Wars's original effects to a shiny, newly digitally-recomposited 4K state would likely be extraordinarily expensive, I think it's far from obvious that it would be profitable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 02:57 AM   #55492
dubious dubious is offline
Power Member
 
dubious's Avatar
 
Jul 2015
310
57
37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
Why does everyone on the internet think they know a company's revenues and expenses for a product better than the company does?
The perceived volume of internet outrage and the actual monetary value of it can be very disproportionate. And when you consider that restoring Star Wars's original effects to a shiny, newly digitally-recomposited 4K state would likely be extraordinarily expensive, I think it's far from obvious that it would be profitable.
You speak like the OT is composed of CGI and is part of a Fast & Furious franchise.

The cost of restoring SW in 4K is a drop in the bucket compared to the potential profits the OT sales will continue to generate for the next 50 years and beyond. New movies, new boxsets, own it again, all over again!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 02:57 AM   #55493
Roy_Batty Roy_Batty is offline
Expert Member
 
May 2010
Canada
1
13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
Why does everyone on the internet think they know a company's revenues and expenses for a product better than the company does?
The perceived volume of internet outrage and the actual monetary value of it can be very disproportionate. And when you consider that restoring Star Wars's original effects to a shiny, newly digitally-recomposited 4K state would likely be extraordinarily expensive, I think it's far from obvious that it would be profitable.
Oh! Really, then why is Universal currently undergoing a 4k restoration of Spartacus? The Sad truth is Lucas never wanted to restore Star Wars, and it isn't like he did'nt have the opportunity. You know he refused to give the National film archive in Washington a version of the original un-tampered Star wars, instead offering a 35 mm print of the special edition instead!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 02:59 AM   #55494
Scarface32 Scarface32 is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Scarface32's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
New York
24
1170
341
4
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_Batty View Post
Really, are you going to let George off with that! Prior to the sale of his company his net worth was 3 Billion dollars. A good chunk of that was from the profits of star wars, your telling me he could not do better than dusting off a ten year old non anamorphic transfer in 480i, 4X3 aspect ration of the original trilogy. And your ok with that?
I feel like you're attacking me for something George Lucas did.

harpolini lamented that he/she will be stuck with just his/her VHS tapes. So I pointed out that it's on DVD as well. It's currently your best (legal) solution. By saying "there are DVDs" it doesn't mean I condone what George did. I would have preferred it if he made the DVDs anamorphic, and I would have preferred a higher resolution picture and sound, but what can I do?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 03:17 AM   #55495
42041 42041 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Oct 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubious View Post
You speak like the OT is composed of CGI and is part of a Fast & Furious franchise.

The cost of restoring SW in 4K is a drop in the bucket compared to the potential profits the OT sales will continue to generate for the next 50 years and beyond. New movies, new boxsets, own it again, all over again!
Again: you are merely guessing - and your guess is far less informed than the studio's. The thing is, Star Wars will continue to generate profits regardless of whether they restore the original film.

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely think the OT should be restored, but there's little to suggest that it's an obviously profitable venture. (And yeah, Star Wars has a ton of visual effects for a 70s film - many of which simply do not exist in a composited, high-quality, un-SE'd state anymore and would have to be put together again digitally from the original elements, if you don't want it to look like something cobbled together from whatever bits of film they could find).

Last edited by 42041; 09-16-2015 at 03:24 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 03:19 AM   #55496
kemcha kemcha is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
kemcha's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
Michigan, USA
18
344
18
32
Default

So, you're saying that that version of the trilogy is crap? (LOLS) I love Star Wars, no matter what version it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Machine Gun Willy
Those look awful on a modern television. No one should have to watch that crap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 04:01 AM   #55497
Cobra Kai Cobra Kai is offline
Member
 
Cobra Kai's Avatar
 
May 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
Again: you are merely guessing - and your guess is far less informed than the studio's. The thing is, Star Wars will continue to generate profits regardless of whether they restore the original film.

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely think the OT should be restored, but there's little to suggest that it's an obviously profitable venture. (And yeah, Star Wars has a ton of visual effects for a 70s film - many of which simply do not exist in a composited, high-quality, un-SE'd state anymore and would have to be put together again digitally from the original elements, if you don't want it to look like something cobbled together from whatever bits of film they could find).
So, there's "little to suggest" that restoring the most popular film saga of all time would be profitable? The movies that started one huge pop-culture phenomenon that is still going strong nearly 40 years later? Those movies? Yes, of course it would be profitable.

And according to Bill Hunt on thedigitalbits, Robert Harris has even stated in the past that the restoration would be "relatively easily compared to other projects, and for a modest sum."

Besides, there's also the little known fact that Mike Verta has already meticulously restored the first movie... In 4k. The results look far superior to the current blu-ray, and the total cost to Fox/Disney came to the total of $0.00

Now they just need to pay him do Empire and Jedi and we're all good.

Last edited by Cobra Kai; 09-16-2015 at 04:08 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 04:14 AM   #55498
octagon octagon is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
octagon's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Chicago
255
2799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra Kai View Post
So, there's "little to suggest" that restoring the most popular film saga of all time would be profitable? The movies that started one huge pop-culture phenomenon that is still going strong nearly 40 years later? Those movies?.
Nobody's questioning the popularity of the movies. The question is whether additional restoration work would generate significant additional revenues and I lean toward 42041: there's really very little reason to think a newly remasterd BD set of the OT would be some huge financial windfall for Fox/Disney.

Most of the people who want Star Wars on BD are happy with the discs they have. Would a new 4k scan generate a lot of buzz and have people here wetting out collective pants? Of course it would.

Would it generate millions and millions of additional dollars? I seriously doubt it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 04:21 AM   #55499
42041 42041 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Oct 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra Kai View Post
Besides, there's also the little known fact that Mike Verta has already meticulously restored the first movie... In 4k. The results look far superior to the current blu-ray, and the total cost to Fox/Disney came to the total of $0.00
I don't know who Mike Verta is but unless he has access to the original negatives, he did not. That's the only thing you're going to get true 4K Star Wars footage from.
There are probably many ways to do it on the cheap - the simplest would be to remove the most offensive scenes from the SE and call it a day (let's face it, most people aren't going to be up in arms about the odd cgi alien and new matte painting). They could scan a print or maybe they've got some old IP laying around and clean it up. But if you want a true high-end 4K transfer that looks consistently good, there is no easy way of doing that.

Last edited by 42041; 09-16-2015 at 04:30 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 04:55 AM   #55500
Cobra Kai Cobra Kai is offline
Member
 
Cobra Kai's Avatar
 
May 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
I don't know who Mike Verta is but unless he has access to the original negatives, he did not. That's the only thing you're going to get true 4K Star Wars footage from.
There are probably many ways to do it on the cheap - the simplest would be to remove the most offensive scenes from the SE and call it a day (let's face it, most people aren't going to be up in arms about the odd cgi alien and new matte painting). They could scan a print or maybe they've got some old IP laying around and clean it up. But if you want a true high-end 4K transfer that looks consistently good, there is no easy way of doing that.
You're not wrong. There certainly is no "easy" way of doing that. But it has been done. And it wasn't just by scanning some old print.
It was actually done by scanning MANY old prints (including a pristine IB Tech print). Then with the help of custom software that took over 10 years to develop, each of the scans are "stacked", perfectly aligned, and then detail is combined from each print to resolve the image back to the original negative. This is possible because every single print has it's own totally unique grain pattern, so different information from each print can be combined together to recover lost data.

Here is the software in action:

And here are a bunch of before and after videos of the restoration itself:
https://vimeo.com/channels/starwarslegacy

Last edited by Cobra Kai; 09-16-2015 at 05:13 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
harpolini (09-16-2015), Lyle_JP (09-16-2015), m3racer123 (09-16-2015), steel_breeze (09-16-2015), Thomas Guycott (09-16-2015)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Star Trek box set 1-10 Blu-ray Movies - International koontz1973 13 03-03-2015 12:52 PM
New STAR WARS box set (on DVD only) General Chat Blu-Ron 40 08-03-2011 03:47 PM
Any Idea when all 6 Star Wars will be released? Possibly 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America devils_syndicate 445 08-15-2010 11:52 AM
Star Wars (BD Movies) Release Planned for 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America kemcha 5 04-25-2010 03:29 AM
Star Wars CLONE WARS Blu-Ray Exclusive 2 Disc GIFT SET + Comic Book Blu-ray Movies - North America little flower 10 11-11-2009 10:35 PM

Tags
ford, george, lucas, star wars, vader


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 PM.