Star Wars: The Complete Saga (1977-2005)

[STARKILLER--1138]

Originally Posted by PeterTHX

That's Mark Hamill demonstrating what he said Lucas said about it weighing 50-60 pounds.

"Hey Mark, it's 2004, 27 years after you shot Star Wars, what was your on set direction from George Lucas holding the lightsaber? Exact words please, people on the internet will take it as gospel exactly what George said."

Originally Posted by PeterTHX

Just admit you were wrong and stop attacking forum members who disagree with your absolutely insane obsession over what sabers "weigh".

Things like that is what gets people stuffed into lockers and suffering atomic wedgies as a way of life.

Never ONCE did I watch any of the films and think "Gee, I wonder if those are heavy or not." Or during the prequels did I think "Wow. They are sure swinging them too easily! It contradicts the OT!" Nope, I thought "Jedi in their prime were sure bad ass!"

The kid is delusional Pete, and has lost track of his arguement which was:

Originally Posted by mrpink134

Bottom line is the swords duels in the PT goes against everything Lucas said during the OT. If I remember right he said that the Light Sabers where to heavy and you needed 2 hands to hold it steady and fight with it.

Noticed he makes no answer to my post pointing out scenes in ESB and even ANH where sabers are held with one hand.

[STARKILLER--1138]

Originally Posted by JamesKurtovich

Don't even joke about a CG Yoda in the OT. There IS a line...

Alot of people (including myself) think that the UOT will surface on BD one day; therefore, if he (GL) wants to change the OT Yoda puppet for the SE BD, I say why not.

[Jay444]

Originally Posted by STARKILLER--1138

The kid is delusional Pete, and has lost track of his arguement which was:



Noticed he makes no answer to my post pointing out scenes in ESB and even ANH where sabers are held with one hand.

I don't think anyone even cares anymore, this was sooo yesterday. Best to let this go, I think a moderator even said it was time to move along.

I think I start today's pointless arguments off with the following: Does anyone else think that the hot green jedi chick in revenge of the sith should have been in like waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more scenes? NOW, Mr. Lucas, if you could digitally put her in every movie...that is a change I would be for...

[Batman1980]

[octagon]

Originally Posted by Uxi

Muppets are fine for 4th graders...

Unlike spaceships, talking robots and laser swords?

[Jay444]

Originally Posted by Darth Anakin

I am fn crying over here....LOL

[Blu Myers]

Originally Posted by Darth Anakin

Best post of the past 2 weeks, hands (no pun intended) down.

[Uxi]

Originally Posted by Duffy12

The BIG problem is that the CGI version is not photorealistic at all and would stand out like a sore thumb in any of the OTs.

Now in the PQs since there is a colossal use of CGI in them, so that version blends in much better in those films.

I'm thinking more of an enhancement than outright replacement. Eyelids, smoothing, etc... obviously motion (climing up and down his back).

[Talal86]

is it confirmed that the theatrical versions won't be included in blu ray set?

[STARKILLER--1138]

Originally Posted by Jay444

I don't think anyone even cares anymore, this was sooo yesterday. Best to let this go, I think a moderator even said it was time to move along.

You got it. My bad.

Originally Posted by Jay444

I think I start today's pointless arguments off with the following: Does anyone else think that the hot green jedi chick in revenge of the sith should have been in like waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more scenes? NOW, Mr. Lucas, if you could digitally put her in every movie...that is a change I would be for...

You mean Aayla?

[Jay444]

Originally Posted by STARKILLER--1138

You mean Aayla?

Oh hell yes I do...LOL!!!

[STARKILLER--1138]

Originally Posted by Jay444

Oh hell yes I do...LOL!!!

Then my answer is hell yeah! Not only that, but I would love to see a spin off series on her.

[Uxi]

I think she got shot into blue hamburger by the clones on plant planet, so no series for her.

[chip75]

Originally Posted by STARKILLER--1138

You mean Aayla?

Can we now discuss over the next ten pages of this thread how Aayla holds a lightsaber?

Update: I just Bing'd Shaak Ti and an extremely NSFW picture was first in-line. Damn MS search engine perverts ruin everything.....

[P@t_Mtl]

Originally Posted by chip75

Can we now discuss over the next ten pages of this thread how Aayla holds a lightsaber?

We could but would it not be more fun if we talked about how she hold....


No never mind, it's a family forum after all

[chip75]

Originally Posted by P@t_Mtl

We could but would it not be more fun if we talked about how she hold....

Lol I think that was implied by my post....

[JamesKurtovich]

Originally Posted by s2mikey

+100,000. No kidding. I still get the biggest kick out of those that claim a few edits to the OT has ruined their childhood. Its like, duh.... you've already had your childhood so it cant be ruined, can it? Please.

Haha, that's being dramatic.

I don't see the problem there, tbh. If it's simply for nostalgia, grab a copy of the theatricals...

Also thanks to the poster who clarified that GL said he won't modify or replace Yoda in V and VI. He's my absolute favorite SW character. If we had a rep system, you'd get reps from me.

[raygendreau]

Originally Posted by Jay444

Oh hell yes I do...LOL!!!

Apparently she had a makeover. I wonder who did her montrals?

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Shaak_Ti

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Aayla_Secura

Those Rutians and Togrutas all look alike from the neck up.

[Talal86]

Originally Posted by Talal86

is it confirmed that the theatrical versions won't be included in blu ray set?

hello?

[Kessel Run]

Originally Posted by Talal86

hello?

No. But I seriously doubt it.