As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Batman 4-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
11 hrs ago
Weapons 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.95
12 hrs ago
The Dark Knight Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.99
11 hrs ago
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$16.99
7 hrs ago
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
13 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.00
1 day ago
I Love Lucy: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$44.99
10 hrs ago
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$84.99
22 hrs ago
Batman: The Complete Television Series (Blu-ray)
$29.49
11 hrs ago
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
 
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Night of the Juggler 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.99
7 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: Which version of Star Wars Blu-ray will you be purchasing (or not)?
The Complete Star Wars Saga 1,335 72.48%
The Prequel Box Set 20 1.09%
The Original Trilogy Box Set 110 5.97%
Not Purchasing Star Wars Blu-ray 377 20.47%
Voters: 1842. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2011, 02:16 AM   #17001
Scooter1836 Scooter1836 is offline
Special Member
 
Jul 2010
2
2342
240
285
137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgec View Post
This is why we fail.

If people spoke their discontent with their wallets, then we *might* be able to get the studio's attention. But 99% of people will buy the set because it's "Star Wars on blu-ray" and that's all that matters to them. Buying shoddy products encourages companies to put out more shoddy products.

Does everyone on here absolutely need Star Wars on blu-ray no matter what?
It is also a VERY small percentage of the buying public that has discussions like this. So even if everyone here decided not to buy for these reasons, it would not make a dent.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 02:32 AM   #17002
kenkraly2004 kenkraly2004 is offline
Special Member
 
kenkraly2004's Avatar
 
May 2010
-
-
-
-
6
Default

I still think we have to wait and see how the OT looks on the blu-ray as far as the transfer quality maybe it will be the 2004 transfers with some tweaks to the color , the lightsabers and the sound mix to episode 4 A New Hope. Just wait until September 16th comes around and or wait for the reviews to come out and then judge for ourselves.

Last edited by kenkraly2004; 07-25-2011 at 03:07 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 02:56 AM   #17003
Cook Cook is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Nov 2009
305
1261
2
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgec View Post
This is why we fail.

If people spoke their discontent with their wallets, then we *might* be able to get the studio's attention. But 99% of people will buy the set because it's "Star Wars on blu-ray" and that's all that matters to them. Buying shoddy products encourages companies to put out more shoddy products.

Does everyone on here absolutely need Star Wars on blu-ray no matter what?
I guess you didn't read the rest of my post. We need to demand a recall. If we don't buy it we have no grounds for a recall. Lucasfilm would simply say 'how can you know its a faulty product if you don't own it.' It has to be verified by owners before we can demand a recall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenkraly2004 View Post
I still think we have to wait and see how the OT looks on the blu-ray as far as the transfer quality maybe it will be the 2004 transfers with some m tweaks to the color , the lightsabers and the sound mix to episode 4 A New Hope. Just wait until September 16th comes around and or wait for the reviews to come out and then judge for ourselves.
And this is the best approach. We have to buy this set to know for sure. After that certain steps can be taken. I'm not overly optimistic, but I'm not entirely out of hope. If my fears are confirmed when I buy it, though, I will be very disappointed.

Last edited by Cook; 07-25-2011 at 03:00 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:07 AM   #17004
Sweetmeats Sweetmeats is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2009
1
776
111
Default

So, I don't have much to update other than a friend of mine managed to see quite a bit of the Blu-ray in action. Per him, he saw the last 20 minutes of AOTC and thought it looked amazing. He was also able to the unmasking of Vader, about 5 minutes of Obi vs. Anakin, Grievous on the wheelbike and and Luke in the garage with the hologram. He hasn't seen any changes that he noticed but did say that a major upcoming gripe will be that the boxes around the ships in A New Hope are very visible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:15 AM   #17005
Ernest Rister Ernest Rister is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Ernest Rister's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
100
590
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetmeats View Post
So, I don't have much to update other than a friend of mine managed to see quite a bit of the Blu-ray in action. Per him, he saw the last 20 minutes of AOTC and thought it looked amazing. He was also able to the unmasking of Vader, about 5 minutes of Obi vs. Anakin, Grievous on the wheelbike and and Luke in the garage with the hologram. He hasn't seen any changes that he noticed but did say that a major upcoming gripe will be that the boxes around the ships in A New Hope are very visible.
His brightness is too high. Even on the DVDs, if your TV is overcranked to "WalMart Display Level", you're going to see the boxes. In fact - funny story - prior to color bars, I used to break in my new TVs by using my Star Wars LD as a reference - matching the blacks of space with the blacks of the letterbox border. If your TV is properly calibrated, you shouldn't see the matte boxes even on the old laserdiscs from the late 80s.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:17 AM   #17006
Sweetmeats Sweetmeats is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2009
1
776
111
Default

That's what I thought too but I really don't know until I hear more from him. He would have seen this at San Diego Comic Con and he tells me that the set up was proper calibrated but again, until he's home, I don't have much to go on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:20 AM   #17007
retablo retablo is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Hollywood
1307
1
Default

LOL wow, pretty unreal. People are already demanding a recall based on a tiny clip. This is LOTR all over again, have fun beating a dead horse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:41 AM   #17008
Jay444 Jay444 is offline
Expert Member
 
Jay444's Avatar
 
Jan 2010
Boston, MA
2
327
1111
1
203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest Rister View Post
His brightness is too high. Even on the DVDs, if your TV is overcranked to "WalMart Display Level", you're going to see the boxes. In fact - funny story - prior to color bars, I used to break in my new TVs by using my Star Wars LD as a reference - matching the blacks of space with the blacks of the letterbox border. If your TV is properly calibrated, you shouldn't see the matte boxes even on the old laserdiscs from the late 80s.
I think this about right. Just looking at the footage we have seen via the links on the last ten pages, the brightness is amped up to 11. Would make those green boxes very noticible in OT. It wouldn't impact any of the prequel films because the effects were done in a different manner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 03:57 AM   #17009
georgec georgec is offline
Expert Member
 
georgec's Avatar
 
Mar 2011
195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cook View Post
I guess you didn't read the rest of my post. We need to demand a recall. If we don't buy it we have no grounds for a recall. Lucasfilm would simply say 'how can you know its a faulty product if you don't own it.' It has to be verified by owners before we can demand a recall.
I definitely read it. You are too optimistic. Once the studio has your money they don't care about your satisfaction. See - LOTR green tint debacle. If they cared genuinely about customer satisfaction they'd put out the best possible product, not a half-assed one that reeks of double dip.

Quote:
And this is the best approach. We have to buy this set to know for sure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 04:16 AM   #17010
aiman04 aiman04 is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
aiman04's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Malaysia
9
Default

I love this thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:16 AM   #17011
Lincoln6Echo Lincoln6Echo is offline
Special Member
 
Lincoln6Echo's Avatar
 
Sep 2009
4
312
1517
8
25
Default

OK, quick question... for all those unaltered theatrical version fanboys out there...

What is it exactly that you do not like about the altered versions...besides Han not shooting first and perhaps the Jedi Rocks musical number?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:24 AM   #17012
horizonline horizonline is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
horizonline's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln6Echo View Post
OK, quick question... for all those unaltered theatrical version fanboys out there...

What is it exactly that you do not like about the altered versions...besides Han not shooting first and perhaps the Jedi Rocks musical number?
The characters in ROTJ during the added song are dancing around like it's Fraggle Rock and are not puppets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:29 AM   #17013
horizonline horizonline is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
horizonline's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
231
Default

And all the other CGI characters including Yoda...
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:31 AM   #17014
al cos. al cos. is offline
Senior Member
 
al cos.'s Avatar
 
Apr 2009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln6Echo View Post
OK, quick question... for all those unaltered theatrical version fanboys out there...

What is it exactly that you do not like about the altered versions...besides Han not shooting first and perhaps the Jedi Rocks musical number?
How about it's not the actual movie that was released, which is more important than a little laundry list of gripes about a 35 year old movie that need to be "fixed".

Last edited by al cos.; 07-25-2011 at 05:45 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 06:48 AM   #17015
randibean randibean is offline
Member
 
randibean's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
54
Default

is September are is still long

Last edited by randibean; 07-26-2011 at 08:09 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 07:27 AM   #17016
earmullet earmullet is offline
Active Member
 
earmullet's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
80
3
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelldweller View Post
I might be wrong, but isn that a new ROTJ shot presented on the official SW Blu-Ray site? Might be mistaken but I like to keep my hopes up.

No, it isn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 07:31 AM   #17017
mitch22 mitch22 is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2011
78
8
Default

how about you guys all stfu until we can tell for sure instead of assuming all this crap.

k thx.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 07:44 AM   #17018
earmullet earmullet is offline
Active Member
 
earmullet's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
80
3
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch22 View Post
how about you guys all stfu until we can tell for sure instead of assuming all this crap.

k thx.
Sure, but this isn't a new shot.
2006 Bonus Disc Port:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg VTS_03_1 2.jpg (20.0 KB, 318 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 09:46 AM   #17019
ematrix ematrix is offline
New Member
 
Aug 2010
35
1730
Default

I appologize to all for intruding on your discusion, I sympathize with you all, regardless if you preffer the unaltered original trilogy, or the special editions.
I think the problem is that George Lucas, in his alleged pursuit to restore and perfect the films, tends to overdue stuff that would have been better left alone, while other stuff is fixed but only half way, and in the mean time, he leaves everybody unsatisfied.

Bare with me for a moment, but let's exemplify with the pivotal scene "Han shoots Greedo first", if he had left the scene alone, probally the acceptance for the special editions would have been greater than it is today. Having Greedo shooting first simply doesn't work, Greedo is a bountyhunter, sitting less than 5 feet from Han, and he misses! It's as ludicrous as missing a field goal from the 10 yard line!

Not only that, but it diminish the change of heart of a egocentric mercenary that doesn't hesitate shooting someone (who wasn't a good guy to begin with) to someone how cares for his friends and fights for a just cause, which IMO has more merit. But GL stubbornness doesn't allow him to realize that no matter how much he attempts to modify that scene, it will never look right, simply because it was filmed to play differently.

IMHO if GL wants to remove matte lines, pulish outdates FX, add creatures in the background, etc. I think nobody would disagree with that, even I don't mind Jabba's scene in ANH. But the problem is that he only goes half way in fixing everything. Per example, he put a lot of efford in removing matte lines from the Rancor in ROTJ, but he kept the matte lines surrounding spaceships in space (which probally would be easier to remove)

GL should listen to his own words "Do or do not, there is no try". If GL should say "matte lines are part of the films history" then he shouldn't have done the special editions in the first place. But he wants to "modernize" the films, at least go all the way and do a fine job doing it, and not half attemps with unsatisfying results.

And that's the biggest problem of all, in the past years George Lucas has been releasing half baked subpar editions, the 2004 transfers were bad, wrong color timing, gamma, etc., the 2006 DVDs were a joke, and even so he had seven full years to fix all this, if he only rehashed those transfers for the upcoming Blu-rays, it wont matter if the films are in 1080p, they would still be bad and unsatisfying, and I also hope that online reviewers will be objective to point it out.

I know everybody is talking, in case the worst is confirmed, about demanding a recall, or simply not buying the Blu-ray sets in protest. It all sounds great, but how about protesting to the man itself? I mean, emails, campaigns, online protesting, demanding recalls, all sound good, but probally this time it may require an extra efford, something that FOX and GL himself can't ignore, probally something like a Jericho nuts campaign.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 09:58 AM   #17020
IndyMLVC IndyMLVC is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
IndyMLVC's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
New York City, NY
296
738
58
754
2
62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by al cos. View Post
How about it's not the actual movie that was released, which is more important than a little laundry list of gripes about a 35 year old movie that need to be "fixed".
Exactly. Perfect statement.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Star Trek box set 1-10 Blu-ray Movies - International koontz1973 13 03-03-2015 12:52 PM
New STAR WARS box set (on DVD only) General Chat Blu-Ron 40 08-03-2011 03:47 PM
Any Idea when all 6 Star Wars will be released? Possibly 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America devils_syndicate 445 08-15-2010 11:52 AM
Star Wars (BD Movies) Release Planned for 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America kemcha 5 04-25-2010 03:29 AM
Star Wars CLONE WARS Blu-Ray Exclusive 2 Disc GIFT SET + Comic Book Blu-ray Movies - North America little flower 10 11-11-2009 10:35 PM

Tags
ford, george, lucas, star wars, vader


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:40 PM.