|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $23.79 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#6561 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Panafonics and Sorney have done their best to fix the issues tho |
|
![]() |
#6562 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
Thanks given by: | gkolb (09-03-2018), tommyboy81 (09-02-2018) |
![]() |
#6563 | |
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]() Quote:
And people who are right should be posting over @ AVS to inform more people, to reach a larger audience and spread the good news...the truth, to help future audio/video component purchasers, to educate with scientific facts and with value oriented products, sales awareness and trusty audio/video dealers, and all that jazz. Last edited by LordoftheRings; 09-02-2018 at 09:05 PM. |
|
![]() |
#6564 |
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6566 |
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6567 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Not sure, that’s Geoff’s team (Crystal Palace). He should be able to tell you. I would guess the P would be Palace but not sure of the L. ![]() |
|
![]() |
#6569 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
Otherwise it's not really telling us anything majorly new, that 4-perf 35mm really does top out at about 4K in real world terms just as long as the image is being oversampled at source with a >4K scan. Doing a 10K scan with a Lowry top-up could eke out a fraction more, but given the costs and technical logistics involved we're a long, long way from that becoming anything other than a curio. |
|
Thanks given by: | mrtickleuk (09-04-2018) |
![]() |
#6571 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6572 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Although, I was reading a post on another thread just yesterday where it is obvious that some hobbyists still don’t understand (or refuse to take time to read SMPTE paper of the year's) the difference between inherent resolution of 35mm film and scanning (harvesting) resolution. |
|
![]() |
#6574 | ||
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It is/based on a picture of Kayla ![]() |
||
Thanks given by: | Steedeel (09-03-2018) |
![]() |
#6577 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Well, sure. Now that we're actually getting 4K content from oversampled scans then the need to artificially bake in more detail in a 1080p rendition becomes less of a concern, although it's interesting that the same scale applies to 4K i.e. once we're into the 8K display realm then a Lowry'd 4K master will hold more detail than an untouched one.
|
![]() |
#6578 |
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]()
She's Lulu Pieri (LP)
![]() • http://www.croydonguardian.co.uk/new...remier_League/ • https://sanjosebarstool.wordpress.co...-cheerleaders/ ![]() Last edited by LordoftheRings; 09-04-2018 at 12:02 AM. |
![]() |
#6579 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() ![]() This is me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdRMVhlNP5I#t=7sec With this - https://www.pcmag.com/news/363363/in...top-processors |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|